Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T12:59:39.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adverse Event Duration with Esketamine Versus Quetiapine XR in Adults With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Subgroup Analysis of ESCAPE-TRD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2025

Greg Mattingly
Affiliation:
1Midwest Research Group, St. Charles, MO, USA
Yordan Godinov
Affiliation:
2Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria
Jozefien Buyze
Affiliation:
3Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
Ibrahim Turkoz
Affiliation:
4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA
Patricia Cabrera
Affiliation:
4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA
Oliver Lopena
Affiliation:
4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA
Jennifer Kern Sliwa
Affiliation:
4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA
Brianne Brown
Affiliation:
4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

In ESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321), a randomized, open-label, rater-blinded, long-term, phase 3b trial, augmentation with esketamine nasal spray (ESK) demonstrated increased probability of achieving meaningful clinical benefit versus quetiapine extended release (QUE XR) in patients (pts) with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). This subgroup analysis of ESCAPE-TRD evaluated the incidence, duration, and impact of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) on treatment discontinuation in adults with TRD treated with ESK or QUE XR according to US prescribing information.

Methods

Pts aged 18-64 years were randomly assigned to receive flexibly dosed ESK (56 or 84 mg) or QUE XR (150-300 mg), both consistent with US label dosing and in combination with an ongoing oral antidepressant. The incidence and duration of the most commonly occurring TEAEs, as well as the most common TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, were summarized descriptively. All randomly assigned participants receiving ≥1 dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses.

Results

Among the 636 pts included in the subgroup analysis, 316 and 320 were randomly assigned to ESK and QUE XR, respectively; 314 and 316 were included in the safety population. In the combined acute and maintenance phases, TEAEs occurred in 92.0% of pts in the ESK group and 78.5% of pts in the QUE XR group. The most commonly reported TEAEs with ESK or QUE XR in the combined acute and maintenance phases were dizziness (47.1% and 7.9%, respectively), headache (25.5% and 13.0%, respectively), somnolence (15.0% and 23.4%, respectively), and nausea (29.9% and 3.2%, respectively). Across all TEAE events reported in >5% of pts in either arm, 91.8% (5831 of 6351) resolved within 1 day in the ESK arm compared to 11.6% (90 of 776) with QUE XR. For specific TEAE events of clinical interest for ESK, same-day resolution rates for increased blood pressure, sedation, and dissociation in the ESK group were 93.5% (116 of 124), 96.2% (127 of 132), and 99.6% (740 of 743), respectively. The majority of TEAEs of clinical interest in the ESK group that occurred on the same day of dosing resolved within the first 2 hours after dosing. For the most frequently reported TEAEs with QUE XR, same-day resolution rates for somnolence, headache, and fatigue were 7.8% (8 of 103), 49.2% (29 of 59), and 9.5% (4 of 42), respectively. Fewer pts treated with ESK discontinued treatment due to TEAEs compared to QUE XR (4.4% versus 10.6%).

Conclusions

Safety data from this subgroup analysis were consistent with the overall study population as well as the known tolerability profile of each treatment. TEAEs were reported at higher incidence with ESK than with QUE XR; however, the majority of TEAEs occurring with ESK were transient in nature and did not result in a higher rate of treatment discontinuation compared to QUE XR.

Funding

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press