Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:01:06.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychobiology of Boredom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Carlo Maggini
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of the psychobiological bases of boredom has been limited by the vagueness of its clinical constructs and the difficulties in applying adequate experimental models. The theoretical background of previous research mainly has been based upon cognitive and behavioral psychology by using neuropsychological constructs, such as arousal, attention, motivation, sensation-seeking, and the reward system. Recently acquired data depict a complex and fragmentary picture. In this article, the author presents a review of the literature as well as some personal considerations on this intriguing topic.

Type
Feature Articles
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 5 , Issue 8: Neuroscientific Approach to Emotions and Feelings: The Last Frontier of the New Millennium , August 2000 , pp. 24 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Maggini, C, Dalle Luche, R. Per una psicopatologia della noia. Alcuni richiami storici alle relazioni tra noia e melanconia. Riv Sper Freniatria. 1987;111:1119–1139.Google Scholar
2.Mazzotti, R, Dalle Luche, R, Cortopassi, E, et al.La noia nei disturbi da uso di sostanze. In: Sarteschi, P, Maggini, C, eds. Personalità e Pscologia. Vol II. Pisa, Italy: ETS Editrice; 1990:521–530.Google Scholar
3.Barmack, JE. Boredom and other factors in the physiology of mental effort: an exploratory study. Arch Psychol (Frankf). 1937;218:1–13.Google Scholar
4.Barmack, JE. A definition of boredom: a reply to Mr. Berman. Am Psychol. 1939;52:467–471.Google Scholar
5.Routtenberg, A. The two-arousal hypothesis: reticular formation and limbic system. Psychol Rev. 1968;75:51–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Hamilton, JA. Attention, personality and the self-regulation of mood: absorbing interest and boredom. Prog Exp Pers Res. 1981;10:281–315.Google Scholar
7.Singer, JL, Antrobus, JS. Imagined Processes Inventory [thesis]. New York, NY: Center for Research in Cognition and Affect, Graduate Center, City University of New York; 1970.Google Scholar
8.Farmer, R, Sundberg, MD. Boredom proneness: the development and correlates of a new scale. J Pers Assess. 1986;50:4–17.Google Scholar
9.Smith, RP. Boredom: a review. Hum Factors. 1981;3:329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Zuckerman, M. Dimensions of sensation seeking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1971;36:45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Zuckerman, M. Development of situation specific trait-state test for the prediction and measurement of affective responses. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1977;45:513–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Zuckerman, M. Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1979.Google Scholar
13.Zuckerman, M, Kolin, EA, Price, L, et al.Development of a sensation seeking scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1972;28:477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Tiberi, E. La Spirale Della Noia. Saggio Sul Rapporto Tra Il Deterioramento Di Sistemi Motivazionali Normali e L'Attivazione Di Un Sistema Motivazionale Perverso. Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli Editore; 1983.Google Scholar
15.Zuckerman, M. Psychobiology of Personality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
16.Buchsbaum, MS. Average evoked response and stimulus intensity in identical and fraternal twins. Physiol Psychol. 1974;2:365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Dalle Luche, R, Maggini, C. Esiste una psicofarmacologia della noia? In: Sarteschi, P, Maggini, C, Guazzelli, M, eds. La Ricerca Psicofarmacologica: Stato Attuale e Prospettive. Vol II. Napoli, Italy: Idelsen Editore; 1989:109–116.Google Scholar
18.Gray, J. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Inquiring Into the Function of the Septo-Hippocampal System. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1982.Google Scholar
19.Gray, J. Emotionality in male and female rodents: a reply to Archer. Br J Psychol. 1979;70:425–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Cloninger, CR. A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatr Dev. 1986;4:167–226.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Cloninger, CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:573–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Dalle Luche, R, Mazzotti, R, Maggini, C. Su alcune relazioni tra noia e abuso di sostanze: noia e temporalità nelle tossi-codipendenze. In: Sarteschi, P, Maggini, C, eds. Personalità e Psicologia. Vol II. Pisa, Italy: ETS Editrice; 1990:511–520.Google Scholar
23.Samuels, DJ, Samuels, M. Low self-concept as a cause of drug abuse. J Drug Educ. 1974;4:421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Palmonari, A, Ravenna, M. I Processi Socio-Psicologici Del Consumo Controllato o Dipendente Di Eroina. Processi Di Formazione Della Dipendenza. Appuntamenti 6/88. Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli Editore; 1988.Google Scholar
25.Sicuteri, F. Farmacologia clinica delle cefalee essenziali. In: Bertelli, A, ed. Farmacologia Clinica e Terapia. Vol III. Torino, Italy: Edizioni Medico Scientifiche; 1978:348–372.Google Scholar
26.Sicuteri, F. Gli Oppioidi Endogeni Come Modulatori Della Omeostasi. Milano, Italy: Maggioni Farmaceutici; 1983.Google Scholar