Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:08:59.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applications of Chaos Theories to Psychiatry: A Review and Future Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Maura Boldrini ,
Giovanni P. A. Placidi  and
Donatella Marazziti
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The great revolution that took place in physics at the beginning of this century, which led to a total reshaping of the science and a different approach to natural phenomena, could serve as a model for future developments in other disciplines such as neuroscience. When investigated by traditional methods, the complexity of brain mechanisms remains quite elusive; the use of new strategies should, therefore, be a high priority.

Although holistic interpretations of brain functions and dysfunctions still seem futuristic, the application of chaos theories may be one way of making these interpretations more understandable. In fact, chaos mathematics can be applied to brain activity, such as that recorded, by electroencephalogram (EEG), and to the interpretation of psychopathology. Similarly, clinical phenomena could be explained in terms of nonlinear dynamics. Moreover, the application of chaos theories to psychiatry might permit the study of the relationships between genetic and environmental factors in determining syndromes and symptoms. This could encourage the development of a nonlinear dynamic psychiatry which, in turn, would allow a better understanding of research findings and, perhaps, open new horizons to psychiatric intervention.

Type
Feature Article
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 3 , Issue 1: Chaos and Complexity in Neuroscience , January 1998 , pp. 22 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Freedman, AM. New ways of thinking for the future of psychiatry. In: Stefanis, CN, Soldatos, CR, Rabavilas, AD, eds. Psychiatry: A World Perspective. Vol. 2. Neurosciences in Psychiatry-Biological Correlates of Mental Disorders. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Excerpta Medica. 1990:27–34.Google Scholar
2.Wiesel, TN, Hubel, DH. Single cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J Neurophysiol. 1963;26:1003–1007.Google Scholar
3.Hubel, DH. Effects of distortion of sensory input on the visual cortex and the influence of the environment. Physiologist. 1967;10:17–45.Google Scholar
4.Wiesel, TN. The postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment. Biosci Rep. 1982;2:351–377.Google Scholar
5.Schanberg, SM, Field, TM. Sensory deprivation, stress and supplemental stimulation in the runt-pup and preterm neonate. Child Dev. 1989;58:1431–1447.Google Scholar
6.Schanberg, SM. Biological mechanism of growth suppression in the deprived neonate. American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Journal: 1988;37. Abstract.Google Scholar
7.Pais, A. Niels Bohr's Times. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
8.Tipler, FJ. La fisica dell'immortalità. Edizioni Mondadori, Milano. 1994.Google Scholar
9.Dyson, F. Disturbing the Universe. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1979.Google Scholar
10.Heisenberg, W. Ueber quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen. Physik. 1925;33:879.Google Scholar
11.Beahrs, JO. Limits of Scientific Psychiatry: The Role of Uncertainty in Mental Health. New York, NY: Brunner-Mazel; 1986.Google Scholar
12.Gleick, J. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York, NY: Viking; 1987.Google Scholar
13.Pool, R. Chaos theory: how big an advance? Science. 1989;245:26–28.Google Scholar
14.Prigogine, I. Le leggi del caos. Laterza, Roma and Bari, Italy; 1994.Google Scholar
15.Doebeli, M. The evolutionary advantage of controlled chaos. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci. 1993;254(1241):281–285.Google Scholar
16.May, RM. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature. 1976;261:459–467.Google Scholar
17.Ruelle, D. Strange attractors. Mathematical Intelligencer. 1979/1980;2:126–137.Google Scholar
18.Ford, J. How random is a coin toss?Physics Today. 1983;April:40–47.Google Scholar
19.Kadanoff, LP. Roads to chaos. Physics Today. 1983;December:46–53.Google Scholar
20.Schuster, HG. Deterministic Chaos. 2nd ed. Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie; 1988.Google Scholar
21.Mandelbrot, BB. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York, NY: Freeman; 1983.Google Scholar
22.Globus, GG, Arpaia, JP. Psychiatry and the new dynamics. Biol Psychiatry. 1994;35:352–364.Google Scholar
23.Globus, G. Toward a noncomputational cognitive neuroscience. Journal Cognitive Neuroscience. 1992;4:299–310.Google Scholar
24.Lopes da Silva, F. Neural mechanism underlying brain waves: from neural membranes to networks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;79(2):81–93.Google Scholar
25.Freeman, WJ. Neural networks and chaos. J Theor Biol. 1994;171(1):13–18.Google Scholar
26.Pediaditakis, N. Deterministic nonlinear chaos in brain function and borderline psychopathological phenomena. Med Hypotheses. 1992;39(1):67–72.Google Scholar
27.Rapp, PE, Zimmerman, ID, Albano, AM, de Guzman, GC, Greenbaum, NN, Bashore, TR. Experimental studies of chaotic neural behavior: cellular activity and electroencephalographic signals. In: Othmer, HG, eds. Nonlinear Oscillations in Biology and Chemistry. Lecture notes in biomathematics 66. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1985:175–205.Google Scholar
28.Rapp, PE, Bashore, TR, Martinerie, JM, Albano, AM, Zimmerman, ID, Mees, AI. Dynamics of brain electrical activity. Brain Topogr. 1989;2:99–118.Google Scholar
29.Babloyantz, A, Destexhe, A. Low-dimensional chaos in an instance of epilepsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:3518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Skarda, A, Freeman, WJ. How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world. Behav Brain Sci. 1987;10:161.Google Scholar
31.Lipsitz, LA, Goldberger, AL. Loss of ‘complexity’ and aging: potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. JAMA. 1992;267(13):1806–1809.Google Scholar
32.Niestroj, E, Spieweg, I, Herrmann, WM. On dimensionality of sleep EEG data: using chaos mathematics and a systematic variation of the parameters of the cortex program to determine the correlation exponents of sleep EEG segments. Neuropsychobiology. 1995;31(3):166–172.Google Scholar
33.Pritchard, WS, Duke, DW. Dimensional analysis of no-task human EEG using the Grassberger-Procaccia method. Psychophysiology. 1992;29(2):182–192.Google Scholar
34.Jansen, BH. Quantitative analysis of electroencephalograms: is there chaos in the future? Int J Bio Med Comput. 1991;27(2):95–123.Google Scholar
35.Pradhan, N, Dutt, DN. A nonlinear perspective in understanding the neurodynamics of EEG. Comput Biol Med. 1993;23(6):425–442.Google Scholar
36.Stam, KJ, Tavy, DLJ, Jelles, B, Achtereekte, HAM, Slates, JPJ, Keunen, RWM. Non-linear dynamical analysis of multichannel EEG: clinical applications in dementia and Parkinson's disease. Brain Topogr. 1994;7(2):141–150.Google Scholar
37.Roschke, J, Aldenhoff, JB. Estimation of the dimensionality of sleep-EEG data in schizophrenic. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993;242(4):191–196.Google Scholar
38.Schmidt, GB. Chaos theory and schizophrenia: elementary aspects. Psychopathology. 1991;24(4):185–198.Google Scholar
39.Paulus, MP, Geyer, MA, Braff, DL. Use of methods from chaos theory of quantify and fundamental dysfunction in the behavioral organization of schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:5.Google ScholarPubMed
40.E, Bleuler, J, Zinkin, trans. Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias. New York, NY: International University Press; 1950.Google Scholar
41.Davis, KL, Kahn, RS, Ko, G, Davidson, M. Dopamine in schizophrenia: a review and reconceptualization. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1474–1486.Google Scholar
42.Sabelli, HC, Carlson-Sabelli, L, Javaid, JI. The thermodynamic of bipolarity: a bifurcation model of bipolar illness and bipolar character and its psychotherapeutic applications. Psychiatry. 1990;53(4):346–368.Google Scholar
43.Cohen, JD, Servan-Schreiber, D. A neural network model of disturbances in the processing of context in schizophrenia. Psychiat Ann. 1992;22:131–136.Google Scholar
44.Cohen, JD, Servan-Schreiber, D. Context, cortex and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev. 1992;99:45–77.Google Scholar
45.Cohen, JD, Servan-Schreiber, D. A theory of dopamine functions and its role in cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1993;19:85–104.Google Scholar
46.Hoffman, RE. Attractor neural networks and psychotic disorders. Psychiatr Ann. 1992;22:119–124.Google Scholar
47.Hoffman, RE, Dobscha, S. Cortical pruning and the development of schizophrenia: a computer model. Schizophr Bull. 1989;15:477–490.Google Scholar
48.Hoffman, RE, McGlashan, TH. Parallel distributed processing and the emergence of schizophrenic symptoms. Schizophr Bull. 1993;15:119–140.Google Scholar
49.Krieckhaus, EE, Donahoe, JW, Morgan, MA. Paranoid schizophrenia may be caused by dopamine hyperactivity of CA1 hippocampus. Biol Psychiatry. 1992;31:560–570.Google Scholar
50.Schmid, GB. Chaos theory and schizophrenia: elementary aspects. Psychopathology. 1991;24:346–368.Google Scholar
51.Vinogradov, S, King, RJ, Huberman, BA. An associationist model of the paranoid process: application of phase transitions in spreading networks. Psychiatry. 1992;55:79–94.Google Scholar
52.Li, D, Spigel, D. A neural network model of dissociative disorders. Psychiatr Ann. 1992;22:144–147.Google Scholar
53.Hestens, D. A neural network theory of manic-depressive illness. In: Levine, DS, Leven, SJ, eds. Motivation, Emotion and Goal Direction in Neural Networks. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992.Google Scholar
54.Callahan, J, Sashin, JI. Models of affect-response and anorexia nervosa. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1987;504:241–259.Google Scholar
55.King, R, Barchas, JD, Huberman, B. Theoretical psychopathology: an application of dynamical systems theory to human behavior. In: Basar, E, Flohr, H, Haken, H, Mandell, AJ, eds. Synergetics of the Brain. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983.Google Scholar
56.Mandell, AJ. Temporal and spatial dynamics underlying two neuropsychobiological hemisyndromes: hysterical and compulsive personality styles. In: Myslobodsky, M, ed. The Hemisyndromes. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1989:217–29.Google Scholar
57.Marchais, P. Formes et évolutions “fractales” du trouble mental. Ann Med Psychol. 1988;10:966–973.Google Scholar
58.Marchais, P. De l'ordre au chaos en psychiatrie. Societé Médico-Psychologique. 1989;18:256–261.Google Scholar
59.Freeman, WJ. Chaos in psychiatry. Biol Psychiatry. 1992;31:1079–1081.Google Scholar
60.Mandell, AJ, Selz, KA. Dynamical systems in psychiatry: now what? Biol Psychiatry. 1992;31:299–301.Google Scholar