Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T11:40:28.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Warning on the Use of Mössbauer Spectroscopy in Semiquantitative Analysis of Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Celia Saragovi  and
Ana Mijovilovich
Celia Saragovi
Affiliation:
Depto de Física, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Av del Libertador 8250, Buenos Aires, 1429, Argentina
Ana Mijovilovich
Affiliation:
Depto de Física, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Av del Libertador 8250, Buenos Aires, 1429, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is usual in Mössbauer spectroscopy analysis to take the subspectra areas as a measure of the concentration of the Fe compounds that generate them. In soils, the presence of different-size particles of different nature makes the semiquantitative Mössbauer studies difficult, and some handling of the sample must be carried out in order to get reliable area results (Bowman et al. 1967; Muir 1968; Williamson et al. 1981).

Keywords

Mossbauer SpectroscopyQuantitative AnalysisSoil SizesSpectral Areas
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , June 1997 , pp. 480 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © 1997, The Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowman, J.D. Kankeleit, E. Kaufmann, E.N. and Persson, B., (1967) Granular Mössbauer absorbers Nucl Instrum Methods 50 50 21 10.1016/0029-554X(67)90587-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, T. and Wäppling, R., (1976) Texture effects in 3/2–1/2 Mössbauer spectra J de Phys Colloque C6 37 C6 719.Google Scholar
Greenwood, N.N. and Gibb, T.C., (1971) Mössbauer spectroscopy London Chapman and Hall 10.1007/978-94-009-5697-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housley, R.M. Erickson, N.E. and Dash, J.G., (1964) Measurement of recoil-free fractions in studies of the Mossbauer effect Nucl Instrum Methods 27 27–37 10.1016/0029-554X(64)90132-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, G.J. Cranshaw, T.E. and Longworth, G., (1983) The ideal Mössbauer effect absorber thicknesses Mössbauer Effect Data Ref J 6 2 42–49.Google Scholar
McKeague, J.A. and Day, J.H., (1966) Dithionite- and oxalate- extractable Fe and Al as aids in differentiating various classes of soils Can J Soil Sci 46 46 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehra, O.P. and Jackson, M.L., (1960) Iron oxide removal from soil and clay by dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate Clays Clay Miner 7 7–327.Google Scholar
Muir, Arthur H., (1968) Analysis of Complex Mössbauer Spectra by Stripping Techniques Mössbauer Effect Methodology Boston, MA Springer US 75–101 10.1007/978-1-4757-1550-7_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, E.H. Ballesteros, M.C. Grassi, R.L. and Blessa, M.A., (1992) Dithionite as a dissolving reagent for goethite in the presence of EDTA and citrate. Application to soil analysis Clays Clay Miner 40 40–585 10.1346/CCMN.1992.0400512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saragovi, C. Labenski, F. Duhalde, S.M. Acebal, S. and Venegas, R., (1994) Mössbauer studies on some Argentinian soil: Mollisols from Bahia Blanca Hyperfine Interact 91 91–769 10.1007/BF02064604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwertmann, U., (1973) Use of oxalate for Fe extraction from soils Can J Soil Sci 53 53–246 10.4141/cjss73-037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres Sanchez, R.M., (1996) Phase transformation of -γ- to α-Fe2O3 by grinding J Mater Sci Lett 15 15–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, R.E., (1992) DIST3E computer program based on the Wivel-Morup method Gent, Belgium Laboratory of Magnetism, Univ of Gent.Google Scholar
Williamson, D.L. Guettinger, T.W. and Dickerhoof, D.W., (1981) Quantitative investigations of pyrite and coal Advances in Mössbauer spectroscopy and its chemical applications 194 177–208 10.1021/ba-1981-0194.ch008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar