Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:05:35.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swelling Pressure Calculated from Mineralogical Properties of a Jurassic Opalinum Shale, Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Fritz T. Madsen  and
Max Müller-Vonmoos
Fritz T. Madsen
Affiliation:
Institute of Foundation Engineering and Soil Mechanics Laboratory for Clay Mineralogy, Federal Institute of Technology, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland
Max Müller-Vonmoos
Affiliation:
Institute of Foundation Engineering and Soil Mechanics Laboratory for Clay Mineralogy, Federal Institute of Technology, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nineteen drill core samples of lower Dogger opalinum shale from wells drilled in connection with a tunnel project near Brugg, northern Switzerland, were investigated. The shale is a well known swelling rock that has caused problems in underground construction work. Swelling pressures determined under constant volume conditions to obtain maximum values were 0.7 to 2.2 N/mm2. The samples contained 37–59% clay-size material and about 35% quartz, 7–18% carbonate minerals, and about 5% feldspar, pyrite, and organic matter. In addition to kaolinite, illite, and chlorite, the clay-size fraction also contained mixed-layer illite/smectite with about 30% swelling layers. The specific surface area of the clay fraction was 135 m2/g. The specific surface charge of the clay (6.7 × 104 esu/cm2), the ion concentration in the pore fluid of the specimen after the swelling test (10−2 mmole/cm3), the valence of the ions in the double layer of the clay particles (+1), and the half distance between the clay plates in the specimen (8–15 Å) allowed the calculation of the swelling pressure for each sample according to the Gouy double layer theory.

The mean value of the calculated swelling pressures was found to be of the same order of magnitude as the measured values, indicating that the technique can be used where cylindrical or rectangular specimens are not available for direct measurement.

Keywords

Gouy double layer theoryMineralogical compositionShaleSoil mechanicsSurface areaSurface chargeSwelling pressure
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 1985 , pp. 501 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © 1985, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Bolt, G. H., 1955 Analysis of the validity of the Gouy-Chapman theory of the electric double layer J. Colloid Sci. 10 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, G. H., 1956 Physico-chemical analysis of the compressibility of pure clays Geotechnique 6 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G. W., 1966 Ethylene glycol and glycerol complexes of smectites and vermiculites Clay Miner. 6 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., 1961 The X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals London Mineralogical Society 393–445.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. L., 1913 A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity Phil. Mag. 25 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, H. H., 1979 Tunneling in swelling rock Underground Space 4 51–61.Google Scholar
Füchtbauer, H., 1959 Zur Nomenklatur der Sedimentgesteine Erdöl Kohle 8 605–613.Google Scholar
Gouy, G., 1910 Sur la constitution de la charge électrique à la surface d’un electrolyte J. Physique 9 457–468.Google Scholar
Gouy, G., 1917 Sur la fonction électrocapillaire A nn. Phys. (Paris), Série 9 7 129–184.Google Scholar
Grob, H., 1976 Swelling and heave in Swiss tunnels Bull. Int. Ass. Engng. Geol. 13 55–60.Google Scholar
International Society for Rock Mechanics, 1979 Commission on Standardization of Laboratory and Field Tests: Suggested methods for determining swelling and slake-dura-bility index properties Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 16 141–156.Google Scholar
Jahnke, E. and Emde, F., 1933 Tables of Functions: B. G. Teubner, Leipzig and Berlin 124–144.Google Scholar
Langmuir, I., 1938 The role of attractive and repulsive forces in the formation of tactoids, thixotropic gels, protein crystals, and coacervates J. Chem. Phys. 6 873–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, R.C., 1951 A micromethod for determination of cation-exchange capacity of clay J. Colloid Sci. 6 219–222.Google Scholar
Madsen, F. T., 1977 Surface area measurements of clay minerals by glycerol sorption on a thermobalance Ther-mochimica Acta 21 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehra, O. P., Jackson, M. L. and Swineford, A., 1960 Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate-system buffered with sodium bicarbonate Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 7th Natl. Conf., Washington, D.C., 1958 New York Pergamon Press 317–327.Google Scholar
Müller-Vonmoos, M., 1971 Zur Korngrössenfraktioni-erung tonreicher Sedimente Beitr. Geol. Schweiz 54 245–257.Google Scholar
Piper, C. S., 1944 Soil and Plant Analysis New York Interscience Publishers 128–136.Google Scholar
van Olphen, H., 1977 An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry New York Interscience Publishers 260–293.Google Scholar
Verwey, E. J. W. and Overbeek, J Th G, 1948 Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids Amsterdam Elsevier 22–76.Google Scholar