Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:16:51.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Size Distribution of Allophane Unit Particles in Aqueous Suspensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

P. L. Hall*
Affiliation:
Soil Bureau, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Private Bag, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
G. J. Churchman
Affiliation:
Soil Bureau, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Private Bag, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
B. K. G. Theng
Affiliation:
Soil Bureau, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Private Bag, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
*
1Present address: Schlumberger Cambridge Research Ltd., P.O. Box 153, CB2 3BE, Cambridge, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The size distribution of unit particles of two New Zealand allophanes (An and Rh), in dilute (0.8% w/v) aqueous suspensions, has been determined by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS). In addition, the specific surface area of the samples was measured by ethylene glycol retention, and their morphology examined by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The SANS data indicate that although both allophanes are somewhat polydisperse, the average diameter of their unit particles is significantly different, being 56 and 43 Å for allophane-An and allophane-Rh, respectively. Consistent with this observation, the specific surface area of allophane-Rh (897 mVg) is appreciably greater than that of allophane-An (638 m2/g). Under the electron microscope, both samples appear as aggregates of hollow spherules but HRTEM did not clearly distinguish between the two allophanes in that the largest population of spherules had diameters near 50 Å. Because of the assumptions and uncertainties involved in the SANS and surface area measurements, the data must be discussed in terms of their respective ratios. On this basis, the spherule diameter ratio is of the same order of magnitude as the inverse ratio of specific surface area. The latter value is also in reasonably good agreement with the corresponding ratios of phosphate adsorption capacity and BET nitrogen areas, derived from earlier studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1985, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Bower, C. A. and Goertzen, J. O., 1959 Surface area of soils and clays by an equilibrium ethylene glycol method Soil Sci. 87 289292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G. W., 1966 Ethylene glycol and glycerol complexes of smectites and vermiculites Clay Miner. 6 237259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebula, D. J., Thomas, R.K. and White, J. W., 1980 Small angle neutron scattering from dilute aqueous dispersions of clay J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 76 314321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyal, R. S. and Hendricks, S. B., 1950 Total surface of clays in polar liquids as a characteristic index Soil Sci. 69 421432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egashira, K. and Aomine, S., 1974 Effects of drying and heating on the surface area of allophane and imogolite Clay Sci. 4 231242.Google Scholar
Fukami, A. and Adachi, K., 1965 A new method of preparation of self-perforated microplastic grid and its application J. Electron Microsc. 14 112118.Google Scholar
Guinier, A. and Fournet, G., 1955 Small Angle Scattering of X-Rays New York Wiley.Google Scholar
Henmi, T. and Wada, K., 1976 Morphology and composition of allophane Amer. Mineral. 61 379390.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Y., 1971 The “unit particle” of allophane Amer. Mineral. 56 465475.Google Scholar
Kostorz, G. and Kostorz, G., 1979 Small-angle scattering and its applications to materials science Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 15, Neutron Scattering New York Academic Press 227289.Google Scholar
Parfitt, R. L. and Henmi, T., 1980 Structure of some al-lophanes from New Zealand Clays & Clay Minerals 28 285294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, E., 1977 Specific surface areas and pore structures of allophanic soil clays Clay Miner. 12 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D. K., Hall, P. L., Stucki, J. W. and Banwart, W. L., 1980 Neutron scattering methods of investigating clay systems Advanced Chemical Methods for Soil and Clay Minerals Research Dordrecht R. Reidel 93168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmatz, W., Springer, T., Schelten, J. and Ibel, K., 1974 Neutron small-angle scattering: experimental techniques and applications J. Appl. Crystallogr. 7 96116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theng, B. K. G., 1974 The Chemistry of Clay-Organic Reactions London Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
Theng, B. K. G., Russell, M., Churchman, G. J. and Parfitt, R. L., 1982 Surface properties of allophane, halloysite and imogolite Clays & Clay Minerals 30 143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandickelen, R., de Roy, G. and Vansant, E.F., 1980 New Zealand allophanes: a structural study J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 76 25422551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vonk, C. G., 1976 On two methods for determination of particle size distribution functions by means of small-angle X-ray scattering J. Appl. Crystallogr. 9 433440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K., Mortland, M. M. and Farmer, V. C., 1979 Structural formulas of allophanes Proc. Int. Clay Conf, Oxford, 1978 Elsevier Amsterdam 537545.Google Scholar
Wada, K. and Theng, B. K. G., 1980 Mineralogical characteristics of andisols Soils with Variable Charge Lower Hutt New Zealand Society of Soil Science 87108.Google Scholar
Wada, S. I. and Wada, K., 1977 Density and structure of allophane Clay Miner. 12 289298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T., 1968 Study of clay minerals by small-angle X-ray scattering Amer. Mineral. 53 10151024.Google Scholar
Watanabe, T., Sudo, T. and Heller, L., 1969 Study on small-angle scattering of some clay minerals Proc. Int. Clay Conf, Tokyo, 1969, Vol. 1 Jerusalem Israel University Press 173181.Google Scholar