Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:35:43.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orienting Internal Standard Method for Clay Mineral X-Ray Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

M. H. Mossman ,
D. H. Freas  and
S. W. Bailey
M. H. Mossman*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
D. H. Freas*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
S. W. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
*
*Present address: Tensleep Petroleum Corp., Denver, Colorado.
†Present address: International Minerals & Chemical Corp., Skokie, Illinois.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Use of a platy internal standard that will orient to the same degree as clay minerals preserves the relative diffraction intensities between the basal reflections from the platy components, regardless of degree of orientation. The method is illustrated with basic zinc chloride and pyrophyllite as the internal standards for quantitative clay mineral analysis in the systems kaolinite-1Md illite and 2M1 muscovite-montmorillonite. Ulite does not orient to the same degree as kaolinite at high illite concentrations. In such nonlinear systems empirical working curves are more reliable than fixed ratios of the scattering powers of the clay minerals present. Random interstratification of 10/15.4Å layers causes a minimum in 001/001 peak height at about 33% of the 15.4Å component. Peak width varies in a similar but inverse pattern, so that the integrated intensity increases in a smooth curve from muscovite to montmorillonite. The major error in application of this quantitative method arises from uncertainty as to the correct allocation of peak areas in cases of overlap of the mixed-layer peak with those of discrete 10 Å and 14 Å clays also present.

Type
General
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 15 , February 1967 , pp. 441 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © 1967, Springer International Publishing

References

Bradley, W. F. (1945) Diagnostic criteria for clay minerals: Amer. Mineral. 30, 704–13.Google Scholar
Brown, Gr.. (1955) The effect of isomorphous substitutions on the intensities of (00l) reflections of mica- and chlorite-type structures: Mineral. Mag. 30, 657–65.Google Scholar
Clark, G. L. and Reynolds, D. H. (1936) Quantitative analysis of mine dusts—an X-ray diffraction method: Ind. Engr. Chem. 8, 36–40.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1956) Soil Chemical Analysis—Advanced Course (published by the author): Univ. Wisconsin Dept. Soil Sci., Madison, Wis., 991 pp.Google Scholar
Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E. (1954) X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Poly- crystalline and Amorphous Materials: Wiley, New York, 716 pp.Google Scholar
MacEwan, D. M. C., Ruiz Amil, A. and Brown, G. (1961) Interstratified clay minerals: Chap. 11 in The X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals, 2nd ed., Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Nowacki, W. and Silverman, J. N. (1961) Die Kristallstruktur von Zinkhydroxychlorid II, Zn5(OH)8Cl2 · 1H2O: Zeit. Krist. 115, 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. L. (1962) X-ray diffraction studies on weathering of muscovite: Soil Sci. 93, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar