Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:37:23.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanomorphology of Kaolinites: Comparative SEM and AFM Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Marek Zbik
Affiliation:
Ian Wark Research Institute, University of South Australia, The Levels, 5095, South Australia
Roger St. C. Smart
Affiliation:
Ian Wark Research Institute, University of South Australia, The Levels, 5095, South Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nanomorphological structure of well-crystallized Georgia and poorly crystallized North Queensland kaolinite particles have been compared using field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). In general, there is good agreement in information from the 2 very different imaging techniques. AFM gives more detailed information on step and ledge dimensions, microvalleys and crystallographic orientation of irregularities on basal planes and edges of the crystallites. There are major differences in nanomorphology and surface structure between the 2 kaolin samples with the Georgia kaolin showing 200–500-nm, relatively flat basal planes with some cascade-like step growth 50–100 nm wide. The edges, apparently flat and right-angled in SEM images, appear beveled in AFM images due to artifacts from the aspect ratio of the AFM tip. The North Queensland kaolinite has much more complex surface structure with anhedral crystallites attached to larger particles, high density of steps and nm-scale irregularities (often crystallographically directed). The additional step edge site contribution from the attached crystallites is estimated as a minimum of 6%, giving a total edge contribution above 30% of the kaolinite total surface area. These structures will generate a substantial pH-dependent charge across the surfaces of the North Queensland kaolinite platelets. An idealized, uniform, pH-independent, negatively charged basal plane cannot be assumed from these structures. There is also some evidence, from both SEM and AFM images, of curvature in the thinner, poorly ordered structures of the North Queensland kaolinite particles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1998, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Blum, A.E., Nagy, K. and Blum, A.E., 1994 Determination of illite/smectite particle morphology using scanning force microscopy CMS Workshop Lectures. Scanning probe microscopy of clay minerals Boulder, CO Clay Miner Soc 171202.Google Scholar
Bolland, M.D.A. Posner, A.M. and Quirk, J.P., 1980 pH-independent and pH-dependent surface charges on kaolinite Clays Clay Miner 28 412418 10.1346/CCMN.1980.0280602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, P.V. Cygan, R.T. and Nagy, K.L., 1996 Molecular controls on kaolinite surface charge J Colloid Interface Sci 183 356364 10.1006/jcis.1996.0557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braggs, B. Fornasiero, D. Ralston, J. and Smart, R St, 1994 The effect of surface modification by an organosilane on the electrochemical properties of kaolinite Clays Clay Miner 42 123136 10.1346/CCMN.1994.0420203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, W.M. and Ishley, J.N., 1991 Kaolin in paper filling and coating Appl Clay Sci 5 397420 10.1016/0169-1317(91)90015-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, R.E. and Bailey, S.W., 1966 Statistical distribution patterns of particle size and shape in the Georgia kaolin Clays Clay Miner Berkeley, CA. NY Pergamon Pr. 317330 10.1016/B978-0-08-011908-3.50030-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Souza Santos, P. de Souza Santos, H. and Brindley, G.W., 1964 Mineralogical studies of kaolinite-halloysite clays Am Mineral 49 15431548.Google Scholar
De Souza Santos, P. de Souza Santos, H. and Brindley, G.W., 1965 Mineralogical studies of kaolinite-halloysite clays Am Mineral 50 619628.Google Scholar
Eggleston, C., Nagy, K. and Blum, A.E., 1994 High resolution scanning probe microscopy: Tip-surface interaction, artifacts and applications in mineralogy and geochemistry CMS Workshop Lectures. Scanning probe microscopy of clay minerals Boulder, CO Clay Miner Soc 190.Google Scholar
Ferris, A.P. and Jepson, W.B., 1975 The exchange capacities of ka-olinite and the preparation of homoionic clays J Colloid Interface Sci 51 245259 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90110-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gard, J.A., 1971 The electron-optical investigation of clays Mineral Soc Monographs 3 London Miner Soc.Google Scholar
Gerson, A.R., Cisneros, G. Cogordan, J.A. Castro, M. and Wang, C., 1997 The surface modification of kaolinite using water vapour plasma Computational chemistry and chemical engineering 227235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabowska-Olszewska, B. Osipov, V. and Sokolov, V., 1984 Atlas of the microstructure of clay soils .Google Scholar
Grim, R.E., 1968 Clay mineralogy New York McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hinckley, D.N. and Swineford, A., 1962 Variability in “crystallinity” values among the kaolin deposits of the coastal plains of Georgia and South Carolina Clays Clay Miner Ottawa, Ontario. NY Perga-mon Pr 229235.Google Scholar
Hochella, M.F. Jr., Vaughan, D.J. and Pattrick, R.A.D., 1995 Mineral surfaces: Their characterisation and their chemical, physical and reactive nature Mineral surfaces. Mineral Soc Series 5 London Chapman and Hall 1760.Google Scholar
Hyde, S.T., 1993 Hyperbolic and elliptic layer warping in some sheet alumino-silicates Phys Chem Miner 20 190220 10.1007/BF00200121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepson, W.B., 1984 Kaolins: Their properties and uses Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond A311 411432 10.1098/rsta.1984.0037.Google Scholar
Malekani, K. Rice, J.A. and Lin, J.S., 1996 Comparison of techniques for determining the fractal dimensions of clay minerals Clays Clay Miner 44 677685 10.1346/CCMN.1996.0440511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, K.L., Nagy, K. and Blum, A.E., 1994 Application of morphological data obtained using scanning force microscopy to quantification of fibrous illite growth rates CMS Workshop Lectures. Scanning probe microscopy of clay minerals Boulder, CO Clay Miner Soc 203239.Google Scholar
Smart, P. and Tovey, N.K., 1981 Electron microscopy of soils and sediments Examples Oxford Clarendon Pr..Google Scholar
Smart, R.S.t.C., Riviere, J.C. and Myhra, S., 1998 Minerals, ceramics and glasses Problem-solving methods for surfaces and interfaces London and NY Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Sokolowska, Z. Stawinski, J. Patrykiejew, A. and Sokolowska, S., 1989 A note on fractal analysis of adsorption process by soils and soil minerals Internat Agrophys 5 123.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.W. Macmillan, J.J. and Wyatt, D.A., 1981 Electron microscope studies of the surface microstructures of layer-lattice silicates J Colloid Interface Sci 82 362372 10.1016/0021-9797(81)90378-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Olphen, H. and Fripiat, J.J., 1979 Data handbook for clay materials and other non-metallic minerals Oxford and New York Pergamon Pr.Google Scholar
Visconti, Y.S. and Nicot, B.N.E., 1959 Further comment on tubular kaolin crystals Ceram Brazil 5 210.Google Scholar
Weidler, P.G. Schwinn, T. and Gaub, H.E., 1996 Vicinal faces on synthetic goethite observed by atomic force microscopy Clays Clay Miner 44 437442 10.1346/CCMN.1996.0440401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, E. and Stumm, W., 1992 Dissolution kinetics of kaolinite in acidic aqueous solutions at 25 °C Geochim Cosmochim Acta 56 33393355 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90382-S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zbik, M. and Smart, R., 1997 Atomic force microscopy in the aspect ratio estimation of the colloidal kaolinite 11th Internat Clay Conf Prog and Abstr .Google Scholar
Zhou, Q. Maurice, P.A. and Goldschmidt, V.M., 1995 SFM morphological characterization of Kga2 and Kga1-b kaolinites from Georgia Conf Prog and Abstr 102.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z. and Gunter, W., 1992 The nature of the surface charge of kaolinite Clays Clay Miner 40 365368 10.1346/CCMN.1992.0400320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar