Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:10:47.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Model for Crystalline Swelling of 2:1 Phyllosilicates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

David A. Laird
David A. Laird*
Affiliation:
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Soil Tilth Laboratory 2150 Pammel Drive, Ames, IA 50011
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A macroscopic energy balance model for crystalline swelling of 2:1 phyllosilicates is presented. Crystalline swelling for a static system is modeled by a balance among the potential energies of attraction, repulsion and resistance. The potential energy of attraction is due to both the electrostatic interaction between the interlayer cations and the negative surface charge sites and to van der Waals attraction between layers. The potential energy of repulsion is due to the net hydration energy for the interlayer cations, the net hydration energy for the negative surface charge sites and Born repulsion. The potential energy of resistance represents irreversible work needed to overcome the mechanical resistance of the clay water system to both expansion and collapse. The potential energy of resistance is responsible for both hysteresis and the stepwise nature of crystalline swelling.

A numerical solution of the crystalline swelling model is presented and shown to yield reasonable estimates of basal spacings for octahedrally charged clays. Measured and predicted basal spacings are directly compared and are in general agreement (r2 = 0.39). Most of the scatter for the measured vs. predicted basal spacing relationship is attributed to inaccuracies of the assumptions used for the numerical solution. The crystalline swelling model readily accounts for the effects of layer charge and nature of the interlayer cations upon crystalline swelling, but does not account for the effect of charge site location upon crystalline swelling.

Keywords

Crystalline Swelling2:1 Phyllosilicates
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , August 1996 , pp. 553 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Barshad, I.. 1949. The nature of lattice expansion and its relation to hydration in montmorillonite and vermiculite. Am Miner 34: 675–684.Google Scholar
Basu, S. and Sharma, M.M.. 1994. Effect of dielectric saturation on disjoining pressure in thin films of aqueous electrolytes. J Coll Interface Sci 165: 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, B.E.. 1981. Ionic hydration in chemistry and biophysics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co. 741 p.Google Scholar
Dirksen, C. and Dasberg, S.. 1993. Improved calibration of time domain reflectometry soil water content measurements. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57: 660–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güven, N.. 1992. Molecular aspects of clay/water interactions. In: Güven, N., Pollastro, R.M., editors. Clay-water interface and its rheological implications. Boulder, CO: The Clay Minerals Society. p 1–80.Google Scholar
Kittrick, J.A.. 1969a. Interlayer forces in montmorillonite and vermiculite. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 33: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittrick, J.A.. 1969b. Quantitative evaluation of the strong-force model for expansion and contraction of vermiculite. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 33: 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, D.A., Shang, C. and Thompson, M.L.. 1995. Hysteresis in crystalline swelling of smectites. J Coll Interface Sci 171: 240–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. and Wilson, M.J.. 1980. Interlayer and intercalation complexes of clay minerals. In: Brindley, G.W., Brown, G., editors. Crystal structures of clay minerals and their x-ray identification. London, UK: Mineralogical Society. p 197–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, A.D.C.. 1987. The interaction of water with clay mineral surfaces. In: Newman, A.D.C., editor. Chemistry of clays and clay minerals. New York: John Wiley & Sons. p 237–274.Google Scholar
Norrish, K.. 1954. The swelling of montmorillonite. Discuss. Faraday Soc 18: 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrish, K.. 1973. Forces between clay particles. In: Serratosa, J.M., et al, editors. Proc. Int. Clay Conf., Madrid, Spain, June 1972. Madrid, Spain: Div. de Ciencas, CSIA. p 375–383.Google Scholar
Parker, J.C.. 1986. Hydrostatics of water in porous media. In: Sparks, D.L., editor. Soil physical chemistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. p 209–296.Google Scholar
Quirk, J.P.. 1994. Interparticle forces: A basis for the interpretation of soil physical behavior. Adv in Agron. 53: 121–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, J.P. and Murray, R.S., 1991. Towards a model for soil structural behaviour. Aust J Soil Res 29: 829–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slade, P.G., Quirk, J.P. and Norrish, K.. 1991. Crystalline swelling of smectite samples in concentrated NaCl solutions in relation to layer charge. Clays & Clay Miner 39: 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sposito, G.. 1984. The surface chemistry of soils. New York: Oxford University Press. 234 p.Google Scholar
van Olphen, H.. 1965. Thermodynamics of interlayer adsorption of water in clays. J Coll Sci 20: 822–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar