Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:27:35.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanism Controlling the Volume Change Behavior of Kaolinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Sudhakar M. Rao  and
A. Sridharan
Sudhakar M. Rao
Affiliation:
Soil Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560 012, India
A. Sridharan
Affiliation:
Soil Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560 012, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The possible physical and chemical forces controlling the volume change behavior of kaolinite were ascertained from the sediment volume of kaolinite in various solvents under no external load condition and from conventional oedometer measurements of kaolinite in several pore fluids. The minimum sediment volume of 14.5 cm3/10 g clay occupied by kaolinite in water where repulsive (R) forces were dominant indicated that the R contribution was insignificant for kaolinite. The maximum sediment volume of 25.0 cm3/10 g clay in benzene where coulombic attraction forces were significant suggested that electrostatic attraction between silicate sheets and midplane cations and van der Waals forces were not appreciable for kaolinite. The positive edge-negative face bonding of kaolinite particles in benzene was unlikely because the protons required to impart a positive charge to the edges were not available in the nonpolar solvent. The 3688 cm−1 band in the infrared spectrum of a kaolinite-dimethylamine sample decreased by 10 cm−1 on H-bond formation of the solvent molecule with the exposed structural hydroxyls of the octahedral sheet. The adsorbed solvent molecules likely H-bonded with an adjacent clay particle. That such interparticle H-bonds controlled the sediment volume and interparticle attraction in kaolinite was indicated by the decrease in sediment volume with increase in dipole moment of the solvent molecule, i.e., 25.0 cm3/10 g clay in n-heptane (dipole moment, μ = 0), 23.5 cm3/10 g clay in toluene (μ = 0.36), 17.0 cm3/10 g clay in ethanol (μ = 1.67), and 14.5 cm3/10 g clay in water (μ = 1.84).

In the oedometer tests with various pore fluids, a high void ratio (i.e., volume of voids/volume of solids) of ≈ 1.3 was obtained for kaolinite in n-heptane, and hexane (μ ≅ 0) at an external pressure of 1 kg/cm2 probably because the weakly bonded kaolinite particles were randomly oriented. At the corresponding applied pressure a lower void ratio of 0.88 resulted in water (μ = 1.84) where the stronger hydrogen bond between flat layer surfaces of adjacent particles favored a parallel orientation of clay particles.

The variations in void ratio-external pressure relationship indicated that kaolinite underwent lower compressibility in a solvent with low dipole moment and vice versa. Thus, the interparticle H-bond did not play a significant role in controlling the shear resistance and volume change behavior. The volume change behavior was essentially controlled by frictional forces and clay fabric. In nonpolar solvents the random arrangement of kaolinite particles and the frictional forces mobilized a high shear resistance on the application of a consolidation pressure, resulting in a lower compressibility. In a solvent with high dipole moment the parallel array of clay particles mobilized less shear resistance and produced a greater compression.

Keywords

CompressionDipole momentHydrogen bondInfrared spectroscopyKaoliniteOrganic solventsVolume change
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 1985 , pp. 323 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © 1985, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Bolt, G. H., 1956 Physico-chemical analysis of the compressibility of pure clays Geotechnique 6 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, V. C., 1964 Infrared absorption of hydroxyl group in kaolinite Science 145 1189–1190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillot, J. E., 1968 Clay in Engineering Geology New York Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hesse, P. R., 1972 A Text-book of Soil Chemical Analysis New York Chemical Publishing Co..Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., Rich, C. I. and Kumze, G. W., 1964 Soil clay mineralogical analysis Symposium on Soil Clay Mineralogy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1962 Durham, North Carolina University North Carolina Press 245–294.Google Scholar
Jasmund, K., Mering, J., Van Olphen, H. and Fripiat, J. J., 1979 X-ray diffraction Data Hand-book for Clay Materials and Other Non-metallic Minerals New York Pergamon Press 177–194.Google Scholar
Kiselev, A. V., Lygin, V. I. and Little, L. H., 1966 Surface hydroxyl group and their perturbance by adsorbed molecules Infrared Spectra of Adsorbed Species New York Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lambe, T. W., 1958 The structure of a compacted clay J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 84 1–34.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. and Stephenson, H. F., 1959 Reactions of MCP with the soil; solution that reacts with the soil Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 23 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. K. and Parry, R. H. G., 1960 The application of colloidal theory to the compressibility of clays Seminar on Interparticle Forces in Clay Water-Electrolyte Systems, Melbourne, 1959 Melbourne Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization 2.92 2.97.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. K., 1976 Fundamentals of Soil Behavior New York Wiley.Google Scholar
Murray, R. S. and Quirk, J. P., 1982 The physical swelling of clays in solvents Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 46 865–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, R. E. and Mesri, G., 1970 Mechanism controlling compressibility of clays J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 96 1863–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauling, L., 1960 The Nature of Chemical Bond Bombay Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. 449–451.Google Scholar
Riddick, J. A. and Bunger, W. B., 1970 Techniques of Chemistry. Volume II. Organic Solvents New York Wiley.Google Scholar
Rosenqvist, I. Th., 1955 Some fundamental conception Investigations in the Clay-Electrolyte-Water System, Nor. Geotech. Inst. Publ. 9 3–9.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K. and Samson, R. H., 1954 Flocculation of kaolinite due to attraction of oppositely charged faces Disc. Faraday Soc. 18 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwertmann, U., Olphen, H. and Fripiat, J. J., 1979 Dissolution methods Data Handbook for Clay Materials and Other Non-metallic Minerals New York Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Sridharan, A. and Jayadeva, M. S., 1982 Double layer theory and compressibility of clays Géotechnique 32 2 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridharan, A. and Rao, G. V., 1973 Mechanisms controlling volume change of saturated clays and the role of effective stress concept Geotechnique 23 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridharan, A. and Rao, G. V., 1979 Shear strength behavior of saturated clays and the role of effective stress concept Geotechnique 29 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Olphen, H., 1963 An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry New York Wiley.Google Scholar
van Olphen, H. and Fripiat, J. J., 1979 Data Handbook for Clay Materials and Other Nonmetallic Minerals New York Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, A. I., 1968 A Text-book of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis London Longmans.Google Scholar
Weast, R. C., 1968 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics Columbus, Ohio Chemical Rubber Co..Google Scholar