Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:38:27.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formation of Organic Derivatives of Boehmite by the Reaction of Gibbsite with Glycols and Aminoalcohols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Masashi Inoue ,
Hirokazu Tanino ,
Yasuhiko Kondo  and
Tomoyuki Inui
Masashi Inoue
Affiliation:
Department of Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Kyoto 606, Japan
Hirokazu Tanino
Affiliation:
Department of Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Kyoto 606, Japan
Yasuhiko Kondo
Affiliation:
Department of Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Kyoto 606, Japan
Tomoyuki Inui
Affiliation:
Department of Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Kyoto 606, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The reaction of gibbsite in various organic solvents at 250°–300°C under spontaneous vapor pressure of the solvents was examined. Glycols and aminoalcohols afforded the organic derivatives of boehmite in which one of the oxygen atoms of the glycol molecule or the alcoholic oxygen atom of aminoalcohol was incorporated into the boehmite layers. By increasing the molecular size of the solvent, the yield of the boehmite derivative decreased, and, at the same time, the basal spacing of the boehmite derivative increased. The product had a honeycomb texture on the surface of the particle, which suggests a dissolution-recrystallization mechanism for the formation of the boehmite derivatives. A hydroxyl group and a functional group, such as hydroxyl, methoxyl, or amino group having the ability to donate its lone pair electrons, were apparently necessary for the organic solvent molecules to form the boehmite derivative by this mechanism.

Keywords

Amino alcoholBoehmiteGibbsiteGlycolInfrared spectroscopyOrganic derivativeX-ray powder diffraction
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 151 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © 1991, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Bauermeister, B. and Fulda, W., 1943 The Bayer process (for purification of bauxite) Aluminium 25 97 – 100.Google Scholar
Bye, G. C. and Robinson, J. G., 1961 Preparation of bay-erite and a modified form of pseudoboehmite Chem. Ind. (London) 1363.Google Scholar
Bye, G. C. and Robinson, J. G., 1974 The nature of pseudoboehmite and its role in the crystallization of amorphous aluminium hydroxide J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 24 633 – 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoph, G. G., Corbato, C. E., Hofmann, D. A. and Tet-tenhorst, R. T., 1979 The crystal structure of boehmite Clays & Clay Minerals 27 81 – 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, J. H., Fortuin, J. M. H. and Sterggerda, J. J., 1954 The dehydration of aluminum hydrates Konkl. Ned. Acad. Wetenschap. Proc. 57B 170 – 180.Google Scholar
de Boer, J. H., Fortuin, J. M. H. and Sterggerda, J. J., 1954 The dehydration of aluminum hydrates. II Konkl. Ned. Acad. Wetenschap. Proc. 57B 435 – 443.Google Scholar
de Boer, J. H., van den Heuval, A. and Linsen, B. G., 1964 Studies on pore systems in catalysts. IV. The two causes of reversible hysteresis J. Catal. 3 268 – 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fripiat, J. J., Bosmans, H. and Rouxhet, P. G., 1967 Proton mobility in solids. I. Hydrogenic vibration modes and proton delocalization in boehmite J. Phys. Chem. 71 1097 – 1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, H. and Koester, M., 1952 Note on the aluminum oxide monohydrate Z. Anorg. Allgem. Chem. 271 41 – 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grebille, D. and Berar, J. F., 1986 Calculation of diffraction line profiles in the case of coupled stacking fault and size effect broadening: Application to boehmite AlOOH J. Appl. Crystallogr. 19 249 – 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedvall, J. A., 1956 Current problems of heterogeneous catalysis Adv. Catal. 8 1 – 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, M., Kitamura, K., Tanino, H., Nakayama, H. and Inui, T., 1989 Alcohothermal treatments of gibbsite: Mechanisms for the formation of boehmite Clays & Clay Minerals 37 71 – 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, M., Kondo, Y. and Inui, T., 1986 The reaction of crystalline aluminum hydroxide in ethylene glycol Chem. Lett. 1421 – 1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, M., Kondo, Y. and Inui, T., 1988 An ethylene glycol derivative of boehmite Inorg. Chem. 27 215 – 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, A. B., Keresztury, G. and Farkas, L., 1980 Raman and i.r. spectra and structure of boehmite (7-AIOOH). Evidence for the recently discarded D space group Spectro-chim. Acta, Part A 36A 653 – 658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubo, T. and Uchida, K., 1970 Reaction between aluminum hydroxide and methanol Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi 73 70 – 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippens, B. C. and de Boer, J. H., 1964 Study of phase transformations during calcination of aluminum hydroxides by selected area electron diifraction Acta Crystallogr 17 1312 – 1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicherte, P. P. and Yost, W. J., 1946 The crystal structure of synthetic boehmite J. Chem. Phys. 14 495 – 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmann, M. C., Vivien, D. and Mazieres, C., 1973 Studies on the infrared vibration mode of aluminum oxyhy-drates boehmite and diaspore Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 29A 1653 – 1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tettenhorst, R. T. and Corbato, C. E., 1988 Comparison of experimental and calculated X-ray powder diffraction data for boehmite Clays & Clay Minerals 36 181 – 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, G. and Sakamoto, K., 1959 Hydrothermal reaction of aluminumtrihydroxides Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 32 696 – 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar