Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:11:27.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First-Principles Study of Isomorphic (‘Dual-Defect’) Substitution in Kaolinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Man-Chao He ,
Jian Zhao ,
Zhi-Jie Fang  and
Ping Zhang
Man-Chao He
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
Jian Zhao*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
Zhi-Jie Fang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
Ping Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China
*
* E-mail address of corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Kaolinite is often a cause of deformation in soft-rock tunnel engineering, leading to safety problems. In order to gain a better predictive understanding of the governing principles associated with this phenomenon, the physical and chemical properties of kaolinite were investigated using an efficient, firstprinciples scheme for studying isomorphic substitution of Al ions in kaolinite by two kinds of other elements (namely, the dual defect). Elements that are relatively common in natural kaolinite were chosen from groups II (Be, Mg, Ca, and Sr) and III (Fe and Sc) of the Periodic Table as dual-defect ions to substitute for Al ions in kaolinite. By systematically calculating the impurity-formation energies (which characterize the difference in the total crystal energy before and after the defect arises) and transitionenergy levels, which characterize the energy cost for the transformation between two different charge states, the (Be + Sc)Al (i.e. the replacement of two specific Al ions in kaolinite by external Be and Sc ions), (Ca + Sc)Al, (Mg + Sc)Al, and (Sr + Sc)Al ion pairs were determined to have low formation energies, suggesting that these combinations of ions can easily substitute for Al ions in kaolinite. The (Be + Fe)Al, (Ca + Fe)Al, (Mg + Fe)Al, and (Sr + Fe)Al ion pairs have relatively high formation energies which make isomorphic substitution (or doping) in kaolinite difficult. Moreover, these combinations of elements from groups II and III were found to have relatively low transition-energy levels compared with other element pairs. Among them, (Sr + Sc)Al have the lowest transition-energy level at 0.06 eV above the valence band maximum. When compared with single external substitutional defects in kaolinite, remarkably, the dual defects have relatively low formation energies and transition-energy levels. The results are helpful in understanding the chemical and physical properties of natural kaolinite.

Keywords

First-principles CalculationsEngineering of ClaysFormation EnergyKaolinitePoint DefectTransition-energy Level
Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 59 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 501 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2011

References

Adams, J.M., 1983 Hydrogen atom position in kaolinite by neutron profile refinement Clays and Clay Minerals 31 352–358 10.1346/CCMN.1983.0310504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, B.R. Jones, J.P.E. and Hall, P.L., 1974 Electron spin resonance studies of doped synthetic kaolinites Clays and Clay Minerals 10 247–255 10.1180/claymin.1974.010.4.03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benco, L. Tunega, D. Hafner, J. and Lischka, H., 2001 Orientation of OH groups in kaolinite and dickite: ab initio molecular dynamics study American Mineralogist 86 1057–1065 10.2138/am-2001-8-912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, D.L., 1993 Rietveld refinement of the kaolinite structure at1.5 K Clays and Clay Minerals 41 738–744 10.1346/CCMN.1993.0410613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blöchl, P.E., 1994 Projector augmented-wave method Physical Review B 50 17953–17979 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J. and Wang, H.N. (2004) Pp. 35–60 in: Geochemistry. (Xie, H.Y. and Liu, P., editors). Science Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Giese, R.F. Jr, 1973 Interlayer bonding in kaolinite dickite and nacrite Clays and Clay Minerals 21 145–149 10.1346/CCMN.1973.0210302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, S., 1997 NMR study of dynamics and evolution of guest molecules in kaolinite/dimethyl sulfoxide intercalation compound Clays and Clay Minerals 45 724–732 10.1346/CCMN.1997.0450511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, M.C. Jing, H.H. and Yao, A.J., 2000 Research progress of softrock engineering geomechanics in China coal mine Journal of Engineering Geology 1 46–62.Google Scholar
He, M.C. Xie, H.P. and Peng, S.P., 2005 Study on rock mechanics in deep mining engineering Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering 24 2803–2813.Google Scholar
He, M.C. Fang, Z.J. and Zhang, P., 2009 Theoretical studies on the defects of kaolinite in clays Chinese Physics Letter 26 059101–059104 10.1088/0256-307X/26/5/059101.Google Scholar
Hess, A.C. and Saunders, V.R., 1992 Periodic ab initio Hartree-Fock calculation of the low-symmetry mineral kaolinite The Journal of Physical Chemistry 11 4367–4374 10.1021/j100190a047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J.D. Cygan, R.T. Nagy, K.L. Schultz, P.A. and Sears, M.P., 1997 All-atom ab initio energy minimization of the kaolinite crystal structure American Mineralogist 82 657–662 10.2138/am-1997-7-801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, X.L. and Angelos, M., 2008 Water on the hydroxylated (001) surface of kaolinite: From monomer adsorption to a flat2D wetting layer Surface Science 602 960–974 10.1016/j.susc.2007.12.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kresse, G. and Furthmüller, J., 1996 Efficientit erative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set Physical Review B 54 11169–11186 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kresse, G. and Joubert, J., 1999 From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method Physical Review B 59 1758–1762 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkhorst, H.J. and Pack, J.D., 1976 Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations Physical Review B 13 5188–5192 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plançon, A. Giese, R.F. Jr. Snyder, R. Drits, V.A. and Bookin, A.S., 1997 Stacking faults in the kaolinite-group minerals: defect structures of kaolinite Clays and Clay Minerals 37 195–198.Google Scholar
Poole, C.P. Jr. and Farach, H.A., 1986 Electron spin resonance ASM Handbook 10 253–266.Google Scholar
Teppen, B.J. Rasmussen, K. Bertsch, P.M. Miller, D.M. and Schäferll, L., 1997 Molecular dynamic modeling of clay minerals. 1. Gibbsite, kaolinite, pyrophyllite, and beidellite The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 101 1579–1587 10.1021/jp961577z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, S.H. and Zhang, S.B., 2002 Chemical trends of defect formation and doping limit in II-VI semiconductors: The case of CdTe Physical Review B 66 155211–155221 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S.B. Wei, S.H. and Zunger, A., 1997 Stabilization of ternary compounds via ordered arrays of defect pairs Physical ReviewL etter 78 4059–4062 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar