Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:50:51.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Bending Effects on Diffraction Intensities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Necip Güven*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effects of bending on diffraction profiles and intensities have been directly evaluated. It has been shown that:

  1. (1) bending may cause large reductions in intensities or even the total loss of them

  2. (2) due to bending, the profile of the reflection may become asymmetrical and it may display two or more maxima

  3. (3) bending effects vary with the class of reflections and they become larger with the increasing order of diffraction, and

  4. (4) the interference function for a bent lattice must be evaluated for each set of lattice parameters, whereas the interference function for an undeformed lattice can be made invariant with respect to lattice parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1975, The Clay Minerals Society

References

Blackman, M., (1951) Diffraction from a bent crystal Proc. Phys. Soc. B64 625637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, J. M., (1961) Diffraction intensities from bent crystals Acta Cryst. 14 920927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güven, N. and Pease, R. W., (1975) Selected area electron diffraction studies on beidellite Clay Minerals .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunze, G., (1956) Zur Röntgenstreuung an unvollständigen zylindrischen Gittern—I and II Acta Cryst. 9 841854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waser, J., (1955) Fourier transforms and scattering intensities of tubular objects Acta Cryst. 8 142150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, E. J. W., (1955) The diffraction of X-rays by a cylindrical lattice—II and III Acta Cryst. 8 261271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar