Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T19:53:30.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of pre-treatments on analcime synthesis from abundant clay-rich illite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2025

Abdellah Ait Baha*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Materials and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, BP 2390, Marrakech, Morocco
Kamal Tabit
Affiliation:
LIPIM Laboratory, National School of Applied Sciences, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, PO Box 77, Khouribga, Morocco
Rachid Idouhli
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Materials and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, BP 2390, Marrakech, Morocco
Mohamed Hajjaji
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Process Optimization Laboratory, Faculty of Science Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, BP 2390, Marrakech, Morocco
Burak Dikici
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ataturk University, Istanbul, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
Mohy Eddine Khadiri
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Materials and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, BP 2390, Marrakech, Morocco
Abdesselam Abouelfida
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Materials and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, BP 2390, Marrakech, Morocco
*
Corresponding author: Abdellah Ait Baha; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analcime is an important nanomaterial in: heterogeneous catalysis, selective adsorption, stomatology, sensing, and nanoelectronics. Given its occurrence in limited regions worldwide, achieving low-cost, high-purity synthesis of this zeolite is crucial. The objective of the present study was to synthesize pure analcime from an abundant, naturally occurring clay-rich illite material without the use of an organic template. Various pretreatment methods – NaOH pre-fusion, sonication, and reflux – using 1.5 M NaOH were explored to enhance the material’s reactivity at nanoscale. The resulting samples were annealed hydrothermally at 150°C for 36 h. The effect of the Si/Al mass ratio, ranging from 2 to 4, was examined by incorporating a fumed silica by-product into the optimally pre-treated sample. Characterization using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area measurement confirmed that all pre-treatment routes converted illite (Si/Al≈2) effectively into analcime, demonstrating nanoscale control and synthesis precision. The analcime content achieved 77.8% through hydrothermal synthesis without pre-treatment, while it increased to 80.2%, 83.4%, and 91.7% with sonochemical, reflux, and NaOH pre-fusion pre-treatments, respectively. Notably, high-purity analcime with superior crystallinity was attained using the NaOH pre-fusion pre-treatment of a blend of clay and fumed silica with a Si/Al ratio of 3.71. The zeolite synthesized exhibited a surface area of 23.76 m2 g–1 and a significant cation exchange capacity of 510 meq 100 g–1. These results offer valuable insights into the synthesis of organic-template-free zeolites, emphasizing the importance of precise nanoscale methodology in enhancing clay-phase reactivity. Furthermore, this study distinguishes itself as one of the few in the literature to prepare pure analcime by innovatively combining low-cost precursor clay and fumed silica, contributing to the advancement of nanoscale material synthesis and its applications in technology.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Clay Minerals Society

Introduction

Analcime |Na(H2O)|[AlSi2O6] is a crystalline aluminosilicate mineral with a mass ratio of 2<Si/Al<5, typically found in volcanic rocks and sedimentary environments (Dyer et al., Reference Dyer, Tangkawanit and Rangsriwatananon2004; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Yang, Ma, Liu and Zhang2015; Li et al., Reference Li, Gao, Yan and Yu2023a). It exhibits a unique cage-like structure with a three-dimensional framework of interconnected channels and voids, and crystallizes primarily in a cubic crystal structure belonging to the Ia-3d space group, allowing for various crystallization forms. This structure is characteristic of the most common analcime polymorph, which allows for significant ion exchange and adsorption properties (Sánchez-Hernández et al., Reference Sánchez-Hernández, López-Delgado, Padilla, Galindo and López-Andrés2016). Analcime can also exhibit orthorhombic and tetragonal polymorphs under specific synthesis conditions, with variations in framework tilt and distortion. These polymorphs, although less common, underscore the structural flexibility of analcime and contribute to its diverse crystallization forms, which are particularly beneficial in applications involving ion exchange and molecular sieving (Gatta et al., Reference Gatta, Nestola and Ballaran2006). The name analcime-C refers specifically to its highly crystalline form, characterized by well-defined structural ordering and enhanced crystallinity, which is critical for applications that require a high thermal- and chemical-stability variant (Jamil and Youssef, Reference Jamil and Youssef2016). Analcime is notable for its large cation exchange capacity (CEC; 1–5 meq g–1), adsorptive capabilities, thermal stability up to 700°C, and relatively low silica-to-alumina ratio (2<Si/Al<4) compared with other zeolites (Geus et al., Reference Geus, Den Exter and Van Bekkum1992; Jha and Singh, Reference Jha and Singh2011). These properties render it suitable for various applications, including ion exchange, chemical sensing, catalysis, adsorption, electronics, dentistry, stomatology, desiccation, and molecular sieves (Tironi et al., Reference Tironi, Trezza, Irassar and Scian2012; Novembre and Gimeno, Reference Novembre and Gimeno2021; Sun et al., Reference Sun, Xu, Sun, Chu, Chen, Shi, Lu and Ruan2022). Given its good properties and potential networks, analcime remains a subject of significant interest in materials science and related fields (Osacký et al., Reference Osacký, Binčík, Hudcová, Vítková, Pálková, Hudec, Bačík and Czímerová2017).

Numerous studies have been conducted to synthesize analcime, aiming to surpass the properties exhibited by its natural counterpart. This was due primarily to the inherent limitations of natural zeolites, which often possess constrained pore diameters and channels contaminated by Fe2+, SO42–, SiO2, or amorphous glass, rendering them unsuitable for widespread use (Yoldi et al., Reference Yoldi, Fuentes-Ordoñez, Korili and Gil2019). Analcime synthesis can be prepared via a hydrothermal route commonly in alkaline solutions from synthetic precursor materials rich in silica and alumina (Duan et al., Reference Duan, Wan, Zhang, Zhao, Jiang and Liu2011; Musyoka et al., Reference Musyoka, Missengue, Kusisakana and Petrik2014; Tabit et al., Reference Tabit, Waqif and Saâdi2019; Azizi et al., Reference Azizi, Ibsaine, Dionne, Pasquier, Coudert and Blais2021). In addition, analcime synthesis has conventionally relied on the use of organic templates (Joshi et al., Reference Joshi, Thangaraj and Shiralkar1991; Azizi and Yousefpour, Reference Azizi and Yousefpour2009; Azizi and Yousefpour, Reference Azizi and Yousefpour2010; Chouat et al., Reference Chouat, Bensafi and Djafri2022; Fotouh et al., Reference Fotouh, Al-Farraj, Kotp, El Rayes, Elfalleh and Khezami2024). For instance, in a study by Al-Kadhi et al. (Reference Al-Kadhi, Fotouh, Kotp, Saad, Shah and Rayes2024), the synthesis of analcime utilizing a polyvinylpyrrolidone template required subsequent calcination at elevated temperatures to remove the template (Al-Kadhi et al., Reference Al-Kadhi, Fotouh, Kotp, Saad, Shah and Rayes2024). Using organic templates in zeolite synthesis presents challenges such as rising energy consumption and the need for high-temperature calcination to remove them, posing environmental concerns and potential contamination (Meng and Xiao, Reference Meng and Xiao2014). Furthermore, free-organic template synthesis provides greater control over the purity, crystal size, and morphology of the resulting analcime (Bortolini et al., Reference Bortolini, Lima and Perez-Lopez2020; Sun et al., Reference Sun, Xu, Sun, Chu, Chen, Shi, Lu and Ruan2022). Nonetheless, restricted template options and expensive precursors hinder the process further, affecting reproducibility and scalability (Khaleque et al., Reference Khaleque, Alam, Hoque, Mondal, Haider, Xu, Johir, Karmakar, Zhou, Ahmed and Moni2020). As a result, the high price and limited availability of the precursor materials, along with issues related to the organic portion, prompted researchers to explore cost-effective raw materials. This exploration also involved investigating alternative pretreatments and innovative environmentally free-organic template synthesis techniques, driven by the increasing demand for zeolites.

Recent research on synthetic zeolites has largely focused on the utilization of inexpensive precursor materials or waste products, aligning with the principles of valorization and green chemistry (Khaleque et al., Reference Khaleque, Alam, Hoque, Mondal, Haider, Xu, Johir, Karmakar, Zhou, Ahmed and Moni2020; Ait Baha et al., Reference Ait Baha, Ait-Karra, Idouhli, Tabit, Zakir, Dikici, Khadiri and Abouelfida2024). Notably, the utilization of cost-effective silica-alumina sources, such as clay, has gained prominence as an economically viable procedure for zeolite synthesis (Belviso et al., Reference Belviso, Giannossa, Huertas, Lettino, Mangone and Fiore2015; Ait Baha et al., Reference Ait Baha, Tabit, Idouhli, Khadiri, Zakir, Dikici and Abouelfida2023). In addition, zeolite synthesis from clay is a valuable area of study due to its environmental and economic potential. Recent studies, including those by Gandhi et al. (Reference Gandhi, Bandyopadhyay and Soni2021), explored innovative clay modifications and zeolite-synthesis processes. Clays from different geographical regions offer different mineral compositions that can influence zeolite crystallization and properties, broadening potential applications (Ajayi et al., Reference Ajayi, Adefila and Ityokumbul2018; Gandhi et al., Reference Gandhi, Bandyopadhyay and Soni2021). Among these clay materials are some of Earth’s most abundant resources, including bentonite, smectites, illite, kaolinite, halloysite, and montmorillonite (Basaldella et al., Reference Basaldella, Kikot and Pereira1990). Given that aluminosilicates constitute the majority of clay minerals, they have been suggested as suitable raw materials with the requisite Si-Al molar ratio for zeolite synthesis (Abdmeziem-Hamoudi and Siffert, Reference Abdmeziem-Hamoudi and Siffert1989). Furthermore, recent research has focused on synthesizing analcime from kaolin, illite, and montmorillonite, leveraging their Si/Al ratio (McCaleb, Reference McCaleb1962; Bentabol et al., Reference Bentabol, Ruiz Cruz, Javier Huertas and Linares2006). Accordingly, the type of synthesized zeolite was significantly influenced by Si/Al ratio variation, playing a decisive role in zeolite crystallization (Joseph et al., Reference Joseph, Tosheva, Miller and Doyle2021). Higher Si/Al ratios tend to favour the formation of analcime due to the abundance of silica, which acts as a framework builder, while lower Si/Al ratios may result in the formation of other zeolite phases or amorphous materials (Sun et al., Reference Sun, Xu, Sun, Chu, Chen, Shi, Lu and Ruan2022). In this context, the in situ method has emerged as a primary means of transforming clay minerals into zeolites (Duan et al., Reference Duan, Wan, Zhang, Zhao, Jiang and Liu2011; Li et al., Reference Li, Han, Xu and Jiang2023b). This method typically involves two key steps: first, clays are subjected to dehydroxylation at high temperatures (500–1000°C) to create an amorphous phase that can be dissolved readily during zeolite production, ultimately yielding an active substance known as metaclay (García et al., Reference García, Aguilar-Mamani, Carabante, Cabrera, Hedlund and Mouzon2015). The final zeolite was then produced through hydrothermal treatment of metaclay in the presence of an alkali metal cation. Furthermore, different pre-treatment methods, which can modify the composition of precursor particles and aid in the development of zeolite phases, could prove advantageous.

Several studies have investigated various pre-treatment methods, including NaOH pre-fusion (Mezni et al., Reference Mezni, Hamzaoui, Hamdi and Srasra2011; Otieno et al., Reference Otieno, Kengara, Kemmegne-Mbouguen, Langmi, Kowenje and Mokaya2019; Murukutti and Jena, Reference Murukutti and Jena2022), sonochemical treatment (Barata-Rodrigues et al., Reference Barata-Rodrigues, Mays and Moggridge2003; Sen et al., Reference Sen, Dana and Das2018), and reflux (Kloprogge et al., Reference Kloprogge, Duong and Frost2005; Gandhi et al., Reference Gandhi, Bandyopadhyay and Soni2021), to activate clay minerals for zeolite synthesis via hydrothermal routes (Yoldi et al., Reference Yoldi, Fuentes-Ordoñez, Korili and Gil2019; Sun et al., Reference Sun, Xu, Sun, Chu, Chen, Shi, Lu and Ruan2022). Alkaline pre-fusion was found to dissolve clay minerals effectively, leading to increased silica and alumina availability and to significantly increased surface area and pore volume of clay minerals, resulting in improved zeolite yield and purity (Belviso et al., Reference Belviso, Cavalcante, Niceforo and Lettino2017). For instance, Pereira et al. (Reference Pereira, Ferreira, Oliveira, Nassar, Ciuffi, Vicente, Trujillano, Rives, Gil, Korili and de Faria2018) reported an increase in specific surface area from 23 to 62 m2 g–1 after alkaline pre-fusion pre-treatment, leading to enhanced zeolite A crystallization and improved product quality (Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Ferreira, Oliveira, Nassar, Ciuffi, Vicente, Trujillano, Rives, Gil, Korili and de Faria2018). Likewise, reflux and sonochemical pre-treatments further aid in breaking down mineral structures and promoting homogeneous nucleation (Carrado et al., Reference Carrado, Thiyagarajan and Song1997; Vaičiukynienė et al., Reference Vaičiukynienė, Jakevičius, Kantautas, Vaitkevičius, Vaičiukynas and Dvořák2021). For example, Sen et al. (Reference Sen, Dana and Das2018) demonstrated that sono-assisted pre-treatment resulted in a twofold increase in LTA zeolite yield, attributed to the improved dispersion of clay particles and enhanced accessibility of reactive sites for H2-CO2 separation (Sen et al., Reference Sen, Dana and Das2018). Similarly, reflux pre-treatment, which has found use since the era as investigated by Baccouche et al. (Reference Baccouche, Srasra and El Maaoui1998), exhibited promising results in terms of illite-smectite dissolution and acceleration of the formation of sodalite zeolite with an increase of CEC from 167 to 367 meq 100 g–1 (Baccouche et al., Reference Baccouche, Srasra and El Maaoui1998). These studies offer valuable insights into the potential of utilizing natural clay minerals for zeolite production, where the pre-treatment methods offer effective strategies for activating clay minerals and enhancing their reactivity for zeolite synthesis. In the absence of an organic template, these pre-treatment methods would play a crucial role in controlling the crystallization process, optimizing reaction conditions, and ultimately enhancing the purity and crystallinity of the synthesized zeolite.

The aims of the present study were: (1) to synthesize the free-organic template analcime zeolite hydrothermally using clay-rich illite; (2) to investigate thoroughly the influence of pre-treatment methods, specifically NaOH pre-fusion, sonochemical, and reflux, along with variations in Si/Al ratio, on the content and the crystallinity of analcime; (3) to carry out a comprehensive, detailed evaluation of the as-received clay and the microstructural evolution of the synthesized samples using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR); and (4) to carry out complementary investigations into textural properties via Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) measurements, along with a determination of cation exchange capacity.

Materials and methods

Zeolite synthesis

The raw clay material was sourced from a deposit near Benguerir, located in the Marrakech-Safi region of Morocco. The clay consisted of illite, pyrophyllite, kaolinite, and quartz. For the current investigations, the clay underwent crushing, milling, and air-drying and the particle-size distribution was controlled using a two-step process. The material was initially sieved through a 100-mesh sieve, followed by a 50-mesh sieve to isolate particles within the 50–100 μm range. To verify the particle-size distribution, laser diffraction analysis was conducted, confirming that only particles falling within the desired size range (50–100 μm) were selected for synthesis purposes. Fumed silica, an abundant industrial by-product, was procured from local plant production of ferrosilicon. Analytical-grade sodium hydroxide (99%) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich.

The synthesis of zeolites was carried out using a variety of pre-treatment methods, and the following procedures were employed to prepare the clay samples and promote the crystallization of analcime zeolite (Fig.1).

Figure 1. Experimental protocols for zeolite synthesis.

Initially, raw clay samples were calcined at 800°C for 1 h (PROTHERM furnace, STF 12/60/250 model, Turkey) to remove moisture and organic impurities, thus increasing the reactivity of the clay. This process was necessary to facilitate the subsequent interactions between the clay and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution. After calcination, the clay was mixed with a 1.5 M NaOH solution in a liquid-to-solid mass ratio of 10 (Ait Baha et al., Reference Ait Baha, Tabit, Idouhli, Khadiri, Zakir, Dikici and Abouelfida2023). The mixture was then stirred (S/N 85215 device, Velp Scientifica, Europe) at room temperature for 30 min to ensure a homogeneous distribution of the NaOH solution and to promote the dissolution of the clay structure.

For hydrothermal treatment without pre-treatment, the clay-NaOH slurry was placed in a 100 mL Teflon® stainless steel autoclave, designed to withstand high temperatures and pressures, and treated at 200°C for 12 h. Following this, the temperature was reduced to 150°C and maintained for 24 h to promote the crystallization of analcime zeolite. The cooling step was necessary to allow for optimal zeolite growth and phase formation. This process was aimed at observing the effect of the hydrothermal treatment without any prior modification of the clay.

In the reflux pre-treatment method, the clay-NaOH slurry was refluxed at 120°C for 5 h. Refluxing serves to enhance the dissolution of the clay and improve the availability of silicon and aluminum ions for zeolite formation. After refluxing, the slurry was treated hydrothermally at 150°C for 24 h, as described in the previous step, to allow for zeolite crystallization.

For the sonochemical-assisted pre-treatment (model 021187, JP Selecta Ultrasons, Spain), the calcined clay was added gradually to the 1.5 M NaOH solution while stirring for 1 h. The mixture was then sonicated for 24 h at a frequency of 50 Hz and an intensity of 110 W. Sonication enhances the dispersion and dissolution of the clay particles by applying acoustic energy, which facilitates the formation of finer zeolite crystals. After sonication, the slurry was treated hydrothermally at 150°C for 24 h, as per the previous steps.

The alkaline pre-fusion method involved mixing the raw clay with NaOH solution in a 1.5 M NaOH concentration. This mixture was fused at 800°C for 1 h to alter the structural framework of the clay minerals, resulting in their decomposition and promoting amorphization. This high-temperature fusion step enhances the reactivity of the clay and facilitates the formation of a more suitable precursor for zeolite synthesis. Following fusion, the sample obtained was subjected to hydrothermal treatment at 200°C for 2 h to allow the initial phase of zeolite formation. The temperature was then reduced to 150°C for 36 h to promote the crystallization of analcime zeolite.

To study the influence of the Si/Al ratio, fumed silica was added to the raw clay prior to the pre-fusion process. The amount of fumed silica added was controlled carefully to maintain a favourable Si/Al ratio for the formation of analcime. This step aimed to enhance the crystallization process and improve the properties of the resulting zeolite, particularly its surface area and cation exchange capacity.

After synthesis, the products from all treatments were filtered, washed with distilled water to remove any residual alkali, and then dried at 80°C for 24 h. This final step ensures the removal of excess water and any soluble by-products, leaving behind a clean zeolite solid phase.

The degree of purity of the analcime was quantified carefully using XRD analysis, specifically through the Rietveld method, implemented with HighScore software. This method is widely regarded for its precision in phase quantification, structural refinement, and the ability to model complex diffraction data (Hillier, Reference Hillier2000; Novembre et al., Reference Novembre, di Sabatino, Gimeno and Pace2011; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Liu, Bu, Deng, Liu, Yuan, Du and Song2018). Additionally, the XRD patterns were evaluated for the calculation of the relative crystallinity index, employing the reference intensity ratio (RIR) method, comparing the intensity of diffraction peaks from the zeolite phase with that of an internal standard, in this case, quartz, which serves as well-established reference material and designated as 100% (Rayalu et al., Reference Rayalu, Udhoji, Meshram, Naidu and Devotta2005; Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Cao, Gao and Cui2010; Tabit et al., Reference Tabit, Waqif and Saâdi2019; Ranjbar Toroghi et al., Reference Ranjbar Toroghi, Panahi, Karimi, Nakhaeipour and Mohammadi2023).

Characterization techniques

The chemical composition of the clay, as received, as well as of the resulting materials, was determined using the RIX 3000 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (Rigaku Industrial Corporation, Japan) where samples were prepared by pressing the material into discs. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) was employed to analyze the different materials, utilizing a Rigaku D/Max-IIIB diffractometer with copper radiation at 40 kV and 50 mA power. Data collection utilized a step size of 0.02°2θ with a scanning speed of 5°2θ min–1 within the range 5–60°2θ and the relative crystallinity of analcime was calculated based on the intensity of the peaks at 10–40°2θ. Infrared spectroscopy was conducted on the various products using a DTGS detector (Bruker Corporation, Germany), covering the spectral range between 2000 and 400 cm–1. The samples were ground with KBr as a diluent and then pressed into 100 mg pellets with a 1:100 weight ratio of the sample. For morphological and compositional examinations, a Tescan Vega 3 SEM with an electron beam acceleration voltage of 10 kV, equipped with a secondary electrons detector (Czech), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDAX) were employed. To prevent surface charging, the samples were carbon-sputtered. The particle size of the various materials was computed using ImageJ software. The total loss on ignition (LOI) was determined gravimetrically after heating the samples to 1000°C. The CEC of the zeolites obtained was determined using the sodium ammonium acetate method (Tabit et al., Reference Tabit, Waqif and Saâdi2019). The amount of sodium ions extracted, representing the CEC of the product, was measured through a titration method. Surface area values were measured through gas isothermal sorption analysis using a multiple-point method (typically in the range of 0.35 to 0.7 P/P 0). The samples were degassed under vacuum at 200°C for 7 h, and measurements were performed using a Micromeritics 3Flex 5.00 instrument (Norcross, Georgia, USA).

Results

Analysis of raw materials

The XRD patterns of the raw and calcined clays are shown in Fig. 2a,b. For the raw clay, the main crystalline phases are quartz (PDF#83-2465) and illite (PDF#2-0056). Peaks observed at 9.64, 19.32, and 29.14°2θ correspond to the pyrophyllite phase (PDF#46-1308), while those at 12.36, 23.14, and 24.92°2θ are the characteristic peaks of kaolinite (PDF#5-0143). Some of these peaks were masked or their intensity was reduced following calcination corresponding to the transformation of illite to muscovite (PDF#2-0055). The elemental analysis (Table 1) revealed that silica (48.73%) and alumina (22.31%) were the major constituents of the clay, with a SiO2/Al2O3 mass ratio of 2.18, along with traces of titanium, iron, potassium, calcium, and potassium oxides. Notably, calcination of the clay enhanced its hydrophobicity by altering its chemical composition, probably due to the elimination of residual water and the organic portion (Han et al., Reference Han, Rafiq, Zhou, Xu, Mašek and Li2019), as shown by LOI of 6%. The BET surface area and the CEC of the sample were determined as 8.99 m2 g–1 and 17 meq 100 g–1, respectively.

Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) raw and (b) calcined clay.

Table 1. Chemical composition of raw clay (wt.%)

Infrared characteristic vibration bands for illite and quartz (Fig. 3) were located in the regions 420–540 cm–1 and 900–1200 cm–1, respectively (Mezni et al., Reference Mezni, Hamzaoui, Hamdi and Srasra2011). The bands between 1200 and 400 cm–1 were attributed to OH bending vibrations, Si-O vibrations, and Al-O vibrations (Belviso et al., Reference Belviso, Cavalcante, Niceforo and Lettino2017). In the first region (420–500 cm–1), the bands at 475 cm–1 and 538 cm–1 were related to the bending mode of Si-O-Al vibration and have been assigned as T-O bending mode (where T=Si or Al) (Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Li, Qiu, Fan and Huang2008). In the second region, the observed band at 1025 cm–1 was attributed to the asymmetric stretching mode of Si-O-Si vibration and is assigned as the T-O stretching mode (Kloprogge et al., Reference Kloprogge, Duong and Frost2005; Moneim and Ahmed, Reference Moneim and Ahmed2015). Additional infrared (IR) bands such as those at 694 cm–1 and 780 cm–1 corresponded to OH-stretching vibrations (Mezni et al., Reference Mezni, Hamzaoui, Hamdi and Srasra2011). Quartz was characterized by the bands of Si-O-Si vibrations located at 797 cm–1, while the band characteristic of carbonate appeared at 1418 cm–1. Bands located in the range 1600–3700 cm–1 were attributed to water (Efimov et al., Reference Efimov, Pogareva and Shashkin2003), as was the band at ~1620 cm–1. The band located at 3458 cm–1 was due to the hydrogen bonding of water molecules to surface oxygen (Perraki and Orfanoudaki, Reference Perraki and Orfanoudaki2004). The intensity of the band at 3632 cm–1 was assigned to stretching vibrations of octahedral OH groups of inner Al2OH, which is characteristic of the kaolinite phase (Brantley and Mellott, Reference Brantley and Mellott2000). After calcination, some bands in the raw clay spectrum disappeared or were greatly reduced in intensity, except for those of quartz and aluminosilicates, which remained discernible, indicating compositional changes. Although the calcination process at 800°C was expected to remove a significant amount of hydroxyl groups, it is often insufficient for complete dehydroxylation. According to previous studies (Bohor, Reference Bohor1963; Murad and Wagner, Reference Murad and Wagner1996; Csáki et al., Reference Csáki, Sunitrová, Lukáč, Łagód and Trník2022), higher temperatures (typically >1000°C) were required for the full removal of hydroxyl groups which would promote complete dehydroxylation as it could also cause the mineral structure to become more disordered, leading to possible phase transformation or excessive sintering, which may impact the desired zeolite synthesis. In many cases, calcining at 800°C is sufficient to remove most of the hydroxyl groups without compromising the structural integrity of the material (Cheng et al., Reference Cheng, Xing, Bu, Zhang, Piao, Huang, Xie and Wang2019).

Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of raw and calcined clay minerals.

The SEM images of the raw and calcined clays (Fig. 4a,b) revealed irregular platelets, poorly defined flakes with an illitic layered crystalline structure, and pseudohexagonal platy morphology characteristics of the kaolinite phase while muscovite exhibited a smooth and flat surface in the metaclay. This description is consistent with previous works. For instance, in an analysis conducted by Sengupta et al. (Reference Sengupta, Saikia and Borthakur2008), SEM characterization of kaolinite clay presented a pseudohexagonal morphology arranged in a face-to-face pattern. Similarly, the flaky habit and the sheeted structure of muscovite were confirmed in a study by Selim et al. (Reference Selim, Mohamed, Seliem and Zayed2018). In contrast, quartz exhibited aggregated, microsphere-like, ragged-edged particles, sub-rounded with observed particle size fractions ranging from 2 to 10 μm (Mezni et al., Reference Mezni, Hamzaoui, Hamdi and Srasra2011; Martín et al., Reference Martín, Costafreda, Costafreda and Presa2022). EDX analysis (Fig. 5) illustrated an increase in the quartz content compared with alumina. The prevalence of quartz among clay minerals is probably due to the formation of clay minerals through the slow chemical weathering of silicate-bearing rocks (Belviso et al., Reference Belviso, Cavalcante, Lettino and Fiore2013).

Figure 4. SEM image of (a) raw clay and (b) calcined clay minerals.

Figure 5. Composition of calcined clay minerals.

TG-DTA examination of the raw clay minerals was conducted between ambient temperature (22°C) and 700°C under atmospheric pressure (Fig. 6), revealing two distinct mass losses on the TGA thermograms corresponding to various physicochemical transformations. For raw clay, a prominent endothermic peak at 35°C (accounting for ~96% of the weight) was observed, attributable to the loss of adsorbed moisture (Al-Nahari et al., Reference Al-Nahari, Laurencin and Alonso2023). This peak diminished significantly when the clay was calcined, where the residual weight stabilized at ~99%. The TG curve for raw clay showed a gradual mass loss with notable transitions: an exothermic peak at 107°C, probably linked to the removal of interlayer water and minor organic volatiles (Ayele et al., Reference Ayele, Pérez-Pariente, Chebude and Díaz2016). Upon calcination, this peak decreased, reflecting the removal of volatile phases. This behavior was attributed to the hygroscopic nature of the clay minerals, such as kaolinite and illite, which are known to retain surface and interlayer water. Furthermore, the raw clay exhibited three additional mass-loss events at 437, 518, and 597°C, corresponding to key transformations linked to the presence of quartz and the transformation of illitic phases to muscovite (van de Kamp, Reference van de Kamp2008; Marsh et al., Reference Marsh, Heath, Patureau, Evernden and Walker2018).

Figure 6. TG-DTA curves of raw clay.

According to the literature, subjecting illite to high temperatures and pressures during metamorphism transforms it into muscovite (Rosenberg, Reference Rosenberg2002; Verdel et al., Reference Verdel, Niemi and van der Pluijm2011; Den Hartog et al., Reference Den Hartog, Niemeijer and Spiers2013; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Xu, Seetharaman, Liu, Wang and Zhang2015). In detail, at 437°C, dehydroxylation of structural hydroxyl groups in kaolinite and/or illite begins, releasing water and forming amorphous metaclays. At 518°C, dehydroxylation continues and approaches completion, marking the primary transition of the clay structure into an amorphous phase. The event at 597°C was attributed to structural rearrangements, including the incipient formation of intermediate aluminosilicate phases or reactions in impurities, such as quartz restructuring. In calcined clay, these distinct peaks were replaced by a broad endothermic band between 400 and 500°C, indicative of residual structural rearrangements and possible final adjustments in the amorphous metakaolinite network (Labaied et al., Reference Labaied, Douzane, Promis and Lajili2023). The TG curve continued to diminish beyond 600°C while the DTA curve stabilized, suggesting ongoing mass loss without significant heat-flow changes. This indicates that the processes responsible for the mass loss were energy-neutral or involved minimal heat absorption or release, hence not appearing as distinct thermal events on the DTA curve. Potential contributors to this behavior included residual dehydroxylation, where any remaining structural hydroxyl groups were gradually removed, and minor transformations of impurities such as quartz or feldspar (Dehmani et al., Reference Dehmani, Franco, Georgin, Lamhasni, Brahmi, Oukhrib, Mustapha, Moussout, Ouallal and Sadik2023). By calcining the clay to 800°C, structural hydroxyl groups were fully removed, leading to the formation of amorphous metakaolinite. Beyond this temperature, recrystallization into mullite or other high-temperature phases may have occurred, along with transformations in accessory minerals, such as the decomposition of carbonates or the recrystallization of silica. These findings align with previous research (Novembre et al., Reference Novembre, di Sabatino, Gimeno and Pace2011; Mourak et al., Reference Mourak, Hajjaji, Alagui, Martin and Joly2021), as supported by XRD and FT-IR analysis data.

Influence of sonication and reflux pretreatments

XRD analysis was conducted to classify the composition of the resulting materials by hydrothermal curing after sonication-reflux pre-treatment variations of the calcined clay (Fig. 7). The XRD patterns revealed sharp and intense peaks at 2θ angles of 16.08, 18.28, 24.38, 25.95, 30.65, 33.31, 35.82, 40.60, and 52.61°2θ. These peaks were attributed to the formation of analcime-C (PDF#41-1478). Unreacted muscovite peaks derived from the source clay were detected in all treatments. The analcime content reached 77.8% after hydrothermal synthesis without prior treatment while the muscovite content was 22.8%, which increased to 80.2% and 83.4% after sonochemical and reflux pre-treatments, respectively. The increase in analcime content with sonication and reflux pre-treatments was attributed to the enhanced diffusion of reactants in solution, which promoted crystal nucleation and growth. This led to greater analcime content compared with untreated samples (Baccouche et al., Reference Baccouche, Srasra and El Maaoui1998; Sen et al., Reference Sen, Dana and Das2018).

Figure 7. XRD patterns of the synthesized products by (a) hydrothermal, (b) sonication-mediated hydrothermal, and (c) reflux-mediated hydrothermal processes.

The band at 3631 cm−1 in the FT-IR spectra (Fig. 8) is associated with the asymmetric stretching mode of water coordinated to the edges of the channels, while the band at 1639 cm−1 is assigned to the zeolitic water in the zeolite channels (Frost et al., Reference Frost, Kristof, Horvath and Kloprogge2000). Concurrently, the absorption peak intensity of bound water strengthened with the gradual formation of analcime, affirming the improved degree of crystallization of the synthesized product with prolonged synthesis time (Ward, Reference Ward1967). As crystalline Si-O-Al, Si-O-Si, O-Na-O, and Al-O-Al bonds developed, the broad band at 1200–900 cm–1, arising from aluminosilicates, shifted to lower wavenumbers (Yusuf, Reference Yusuf2023). This shift suggests a restructuring or reorganization of the aluminosilicate network due to the development of crystalline phases. In addition, symmetric stretching and bending vibration of the T-O bonds in the TO4 tetrahedral structure produced peaks at 722 cm–1 and 500 cm–1. In addition, the double-membered rings D4R and D6R, providing characteristic markers for the presence of analcime in the sample, were identified by the band centered on 567 cm–1 (Jin et al., Reference Jin, Liu, Han, Zhang, Li, Zhu, Li and Wang2022). The band at 432 cm–1 is characteristic of O-Si-O bonding mode, i.e. typical of the bending vibrations of 4-membered rings (Novembre and Gimeno, Reference Novembre and Gimeno2021).

Figure 8. FT-IR spectra of the synthesized products using various hydrothermal routes.

SEM images (Fig. 9) show the dissolution of clay minerals and the crystallization process. The final material consisted mainly of a visible-channel analcime system, smooth-rough microcrystals, or crystals resembling clean-faceted octahedra, while some exhibit intergrowths and fractures. In addition, remnants of a nearly fully dissolved flat and smooth, layered structure, typical of original muscovite, were observed, with the beginnings of the formation of crystals of the same diameter as analcime (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Yang, Ma, Liu and Zhang2015; Bortolini et al., Reference Bortolini, Lima and Perez-Lopez2020). These observations are reliable based on information from several previous studies (Dyer et al., Reference Dyer, Tangkawanit and Rangsriwatananon2004; Azizi and Ehsani Tilami, Reference Azizi and Ehsani Tilami2013; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Yang, Ma, Liu and Zhang2015; Osacký et al., Reference Osacký, Binčík, Hudcová, Vítková, Pálková, Hudec, Bačík and Czímerová2017). In addition, EDX analysis of the sample-mediated hydrothermal process (Fig. 9) showed similar quartz and alumina rates, indicating comparable solubility kinetics under these hydrothermal conditions. This intriguing feature suggests the potential use of these unprocessed clay minerals not only as a precursor for silicon and aluminum but also as a hard co-template that shapes the growth geometry of zeolite crystals.

Figure 9. SEM-EDX of the synthesized products by (a) hydrothermal, (b) sonication-mediated hydrothermal, and (c) reflux-mediated hydrothermal processes.

Influence of NaOH pre-fusion pre-treatment on zeolite crystallization

The resulting materials from the various experiments were identified by XRD. These experiments included NaOH pre-fusion alone, NaOH pre-fusion-mediated hydrothermal treatment, and variations involving the addition of fumed silica during pre-fusion (Fig. 10). First, the XRD pattern of the NaOH pre-fusion treatment (Fig. 10a) revealed sharp peaks attributed to the nepheline phase (PDF#76-2469). Under these conditions, sodalite (PDF#82-1812), a secondary product, was formed. No peaks associated with illite, pyrophyllite, or kaolinite were detected, as they underwent dissolution upon pre-fusion with NaOH, resulting in structural changes.

Figure 10. XRD patterns illustrating the effect of NaOH perfusion (a) only, (b) mediated hydrothermal, (c) with fumed silica addition only, and (d) with addition of fumed silica and mediated hydrothermal treatment.

Upon subsequent hydrothermal treatment, the composition (Fig. 10b) revealed a mixture of analcime-C and nepheline, with the amounts reaching 91.7% and 8.3%, respectively. In addition, the crystallinity of the analcime attained 167% and the Si/Al mass ratio of the resulting sample was determined to be 2.20 according to XRF analysis. The crystallinity value exceeding 100% suggests a high degree of structural order within the analcime crystal lattice, as verified by quantitative XRD measurements. This elevated value was attributed to the effectiveness of the NaOH pre-fusion pre-treatment in promoting crystallization from high-purity sources, namely clay and fumed silica. These sources, when pre-treated, provided an optimal balance of silica and alumina, facilitating the growth of highly ordered analcime crystals. Consequently, this treatment enhanced nucleation density and crystal growth, leading to the observed high crystallinity. Throughout the hydrothermal curing, the peaks associated with the sodalite phase exhibited recrystallization tendencies, acting as precursor materials; sodalite provided essential components for analcime formation under heightened heat and pressure conditions. These findings are corroborated by various studies in the field (García-Villén et al., Reference García-Villén, Flores-Ruíz, Verdugo-Escamilla and Huertas2018; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Jiang, Liu, Chen and Tong2022). Notably, the pre-fusion method significantly contributed to the formation of analcime compared with other routes. It is worth mentioning that the reaction time and temperature influenced the crystallinity of analcime, with a gradual increase in diffraction peak intensity as starting materials pre-fused entirely (Atta et al., Reference Atta, Jibril, Aderemi and Adefila2012).

A thorough morphological analysis was conducted as part of the comprehensive investigation. SEM images of the nepheline phase (Fig. 11a) were represented by small, jagged particles slightly colored, consistent with published data on this phase (Jena et al., Reference Jena, Dhawan, Rao, Misra, Mishra and Das2014), while analcime appeared as large, angular spheres of rough microcrystals with some fractures (Bortolini et al., Reference Bortolini, Lima and Perez-Lopez2020). In terms of EDX analysis, the pre-fusion-mediated hydrothermal process demonstrated greater solubility kinetics for alumina. This phenomenon contributed to the prevalence of sodium in the formation of the nepheline phase (Azizi and Yousefpour, Reference Azizi and Yousefpour2010). SEM-EDX images further corroborated the XRD results, validating the effectiveness of the pre-fusion process in extracting silicon and aluminum species from the clay. This extraction enhanced the hydrothermal reactivity of the clay. Overall, the alkaline fusion process promoted interaction between crystalline mineral phases successfully within the clay and the alkaline activator.

Figure 11. SEM images and EDX analysis of the effect of NaOH pre-fusion: (a) NaOH pre-fusion mediated hydrothermal, and (b) NaOH pre-fusion with the addition of fumed silica and mediated hydrothermal treatment.

In order to assess the impact of the Si/Al mass ratio, additional experiments were conducted where fumed silica was added to the raw clay to be prefused. A literature survey, incorporating additional silicon, resulted in greater Si/Al ratios, thus enhancing catalytic activity (Mintova and Valtchev, Reference Mintova and Valtchev2002; Otieno et al., Reference Otieno, Kengara, Kemmegne-Mbouguen, Langmi, Kowenje and Mokaya2019), and the observed peaks (Fig. 10c) corresponded to nepheline (Si-rich) (PDF#79-0993). However, no zeolite formation occurred when extra silicon was added without hydrothermal curing, indicating an amorphization step as manifested by lower peak intensities of Si-rich nepheline and the high background signal (Cundy and Cox, Reference Cundy and Cox2005; Li et al., Reference Li, Chawla, Linares, Sutjianto, Chapman, Martínez and Rimer2018; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Zhao, Liu, Li, Xia, Ma, Wang, Chen, Wang, Zeng, Liu, Liu, Gao, Xu and Shen2024b). In contrast, all XRD peaks (Fig. 10d) in the resulting material corresponded to pure analcime-C (highly crystalline form), indicating the formation of high-purity crystalline analcime when followed by hydrothermal curing. While the XRD patterns confirmed the complete crystallization of pure analcime-C and the absence of peaks from precursor materials, it is acknowledged that trace amounts of amorphous material, inherent in the synthesis process, may have existed but were below the detection limit of XRD techniques (Chiang et al., Reference Chiang, Fun, Wu and Tsai2010; Akinbodunse et al., Reference Akinbodunse, Ufer, Dohrmann and Mikutta2024). The Si/Al mass ratio of the synthesized sample was determined to be 3.71, based on XRF analysis, which led to an estimated normalized chemical formula of NaAlSi4O10. Although this differs slightly from the ideal formula of analcime, in NaAlSi₂O₆·H₂O, which typically contains two silicon atoms per formula unit, the presence of four silicon atoms in the formula can be explained by the structural flexibility inherent in zeolites, especially analcime (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Bai, Wang and He2021). Zeolitic frameworks are known to exhibit some variability in their Si/Al ratio, with the silicon content occasionally being greater than the ideal stoichiometric ratio due to variations in the local structure or synthesis conditions (Mattioli and Cenni, Reference Mattioli and Cenni2020; Novembre and Gimeno, Reference Novembre and Gimeno2021). The 10 oxygen atoms observed can also be accounted for, as analcime and other zeolites exhibit flexible silicate frameworks where oxygen atoms are involved in bridging between silicon and aluminum, which may slightly alter the overall stoichiometry, particularly in partially hydrated forms or suboptimal synthesis conditions (Henderson et al., Reference Henderson, Hamilton and Waters2014; O’Keeffe, Reference O’Keeffe2014). These variations are common in the synthesis of zeolites under various temperature and pressure conditions, referring to the inherent variability in synthesis conditions leading to deviations from the ideal stoichiometric composition (Zhang and Ostraat, Reference Zhang and Ostraat2016; Asselman et al., Reference Asselman, Vandenabeele, Pellens, Doppelhammer, Kirschhock and Breynaert2022). Thus, despite the differences in the Si/Al ratio, the synthesized material can still be classified as analcime due to its structural and chemical similarities, including its framework structure and cation exchange properties, which are characteristic of analcime and its close relatives in the tectosilicate group (Samantray et al., Reference Samantray, Anand, Dash, Ghosh and Behera2022; Kropáč et al., Reference Kropáč, Dolníček and Ulmanová2024). In addition, the formation of analcime and the effectiveness of fumed silica during the pre-fusion and hydrothermal stages is further supported by SEM-EDX data (Fig. 11b), confirming analcime crystallization. The shapes of globules were related to analcime, representing rounded, clean-faceted crystals with an average diameter of ~7 μm computed using ImageJ software. This result is very satisfactory when compared with the size of the crystals obtained by other authors in the past; for example, Jamil and Youssef (Reference Jamil and Youssef2016), synthesized analcime from kaolinite, reaching crystal sizes of 5–7 μm, while Hegazy et al. (Reference Hegazy, El Maksod and El Enin2010) observed average dimensions of 10 μm. Based on the XRD and SEM results, this adjustment of the Si/Al ratio with more silicon led to the production of pure analcime, in line with evidence from the literature (Rubtsova et al., Reference Rubtsova, Smirnova, Boev, Kotelev, Cherednichenko, Vinokurov, Lvov and Glotov2022).

A comparative study using a variation of CEC and BET analysis

An overview of CEC and BET values obtained from the raw clay before and after various hydrothermal pretreatments (Table 2) revealed a marked increase in CEC values in the products, ranging from ~100 to 510 meq 100 g–1, compared with 17 meq 100 g–1 in the raw material. While maintaining the Si/Al mass ratio as in the raw clay, a noteworthy value of 447 meq 100 g–1 was obtained when utilizing the NaOH pre-fusion mediated hydrothermal method, surpassing the other routes. This variance can be attributed to the muscovite mineral composition among the other products, as shown by XRD patterns, which constrained the porosity of the resulting analcime. In addition, the pre-fusion-mediated process yielded a product rich in nepheline. The adsorptive behavior of nepheline along with analcime was quite beneficial, promoting retention capabilities (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Feng, Liu, Li, Tang and Li2017; Tahmasebipour et al., Reference Tahmasebipour, Khorshidi and Azadmehr2023). In terms of specific surface area (Fig. 12), the greater value of ~19.62 m2 g–1 was similarly achieved for the NaOH pre-fusion mediated hydrothermal sample, followed by reflux-mediated hydrothermal treatment (17.88 m2 g–1), hydrothermal treatment (12.39 m2 g–1), and sonochemical-mediated hydrothermal treatment (8.14 m2 g–1). This result may be attributed to enhanced crystal growth facilitated by sonication, leading to larger, well-formed crystals, which in turn may reduce the overall surface area by decreasing porosity and potentially promoting crystal aggregation (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Du, Wang and Xue2024a).

Table 2. CEC and BET measurements

Hydro* = hydrothermal.

Figure 12. BET analysis of the resulting powders.

These results underscore the significant positive impact of the pre-fusion method on the synthesis process where others have emphasized that the most substantial zeolitization occurs through the reaction between NaOH and the raw material at elevated temperatures, facilitating the dissolution of species in water (Tironi et al., Reference Tironi, Trezza, Irassar and Scian2012; Belviso et al., Reference Belviso, Cavalcante, Niceforo and Lettino2017).

In addition, a distinct synthesis pathway was evaluated for the NaOH pre-fusion mediated hydrothermal method where the impact of introducing additional silicon during pre-fusion was explored. This finding explicitly affirms the supremacy of the NaOH pre-fusion mediated hydrothermal method in the realm of zeolite synthesis when adding fumed silica. Not only did this method yield analcime samples with the largest CEC values (510 meq 100 g–1), but it also exhibited remarkable enhancements in BET surface area (23.76 m2 g–1) compared with its counterparts. This can be attributed to fumed silica that acts as an additional, highly reactive source of silicon that readily integrates into the zeolite framework, promoting uniform and dense crystal growth with well-defined pore structures (Otieno et al., Reference Otieno, Kengara, Kemmegne-Mbouguen, Langmi, Kowenje and Mokaya2019). This additional silica not only increases the nucleation sites, leading to more extensive crystal formation but also optimizes the Si/Al ratio, which is essential for forming an open and accessible aluminosilicate framework (Barthel et al., Reference Barthel, Rösch and Weis2005). The result is a zeolite structure with increased porosity and a greater number of exchange sites, thereby maximizing both the BET surface area and the CEC. The notable increase in CEC values associated with the introduction of extra silicon is pivotal, showcasing the enhanced ion-exchange capacity achievable through this method. This result bears profound implications for applications in water treatment, catalysis, and environmental remediation, where superior ion exchange properties are essential (Smyth and Caporuscio, Reference Smyth and Caporuscio1981; Yuan et al., Reference Yuan, Yang, Ma and Liu2016; Tsitsishvili et al., Reference Tsitsishvili, Dolaberidze, Nijaradze, Mirdzveli, Amiridze, Sharashenidze and Gabunia2021). Moreover, the BET analysis underscores the substantial gains in surface area and porosity achieved by incorporating extra silicon. This augmented surface area holds paramount importance in catalysis and adsorption processes, illustrating the method’s potential for advanced material engineering (Cundy and Cox, Reference Cundy and Cox2003; Sharma et al., Reference Sharma, Sutar, Xiao and Zhang2023).

This comprehensive comparative study firmly establishes the NaOH pre-fusion mediated hydrothermal process as the method of choice for producing zeolites with exceptional CEC and BET values. These results underscore the importance of alkaline pre-fusion in enhancing clay reactivity and optimizing zeolite properties. The purity of the analcime synthesized was quantified at 100%, aligning with the threshold for industrial standards, which typically require ≥90% purity, and the exceptional surface area and cation exchange capacity of the zeolites synthesized highlight their potential for various applications, promising advances in fields such as ion exchange and catalysis (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Zhang, Lv, Jing, Gao, Gu, Li, Ao and Fang2024c). Put simply, the protocol’s efficacy in achieving this level of purity supports its potential scalability and adaptation for industrial processes.

Conclusions

The present study aimed to hydrothermally synthesize analcime from Moroccan clays at 150°C for 36 h, employing various nanoscale synthesis pre-treatments including NaOH pre-fusion, sonication, and reflux, all using a 1.5 M NaOH solution. The experiments further explored the role of fumed silica in the synthesis process. The results demonstrated that each method impacted the chemical breakdown and nanoscale reconfiguration of the clays differently, with the NaOH pre-fusion method proving most effective in disrupting the clay structure and advancing the amorphization process. Analcime-C emerged as the primary zeolite phase across all methods, with high-purity crystals predominantly formed through the hydrothermal pre-fusion process, especially when enhanced with fumed silica. Traditional nanoscale synthesis techniques such as sonication or reflux yielded zeolites of lower purity primarily because these methods did not achieve the same degree of structural breakdown and amorphization as the NaOH pre-fusion approach. While sonication and reflux introduced nanoscale modifications, they failed to disrupt the silicate framework of the clay minerals significantly, which is necessary for the structural reorganization that forms high-purity zeolite phases. The synthesized zeolite showcased a remarkable surface area of 23.76 m2 g–1 and an impressive CEC of 510 meq 100 g–1, underscoring the effectiveness of innovative zeolite synthesis methods in optimizing clay reactivity at nanoscale. This research highlights the critical role of alkaline pre-fusion in enhancing feedstock reactivity, leading to the synthesis of high-purity zeolites. It provides valuable insights into zeolite synthesis and its applications, laying the foundation for further nanoscale research and development in this field.

Data availability statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Center of Analysis and Characterization (CAC) and the Innovation Center (IC) at Cadi Ayyad University (Marrakech, Morocco). This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Mohamed Hajjaji, whose expertise, passion, and commitment to advancing knowledge have been an inspiration to all. His contributions have left a lasting impact on this field.

Author contributions

Abdellah Ait Baha: Writing – original draft, Software, Conceptualization, Methodology, Laboratory analysis, Data curation, Data visualization, Formal analysis; Rachid Idouhli: Writing – review & editing, Validation. Kamal Tabit: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Validation; Mohamed Hajjaji: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Validation. Burak Dikici: Writing – review & editing; Mohy Eddine Khadiri: Supervision; Abdesselam Abouelfida: Supervision. All authors reviewed the article.

Financial support

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

Abdmeziem-Hamoudi, K., & Siffert, B. (1989). Synthesis of molecular sieve zeolites from a smectite-type clay material. Applied Clay Science, 4, 19.Google Scholar
Ait Baha, A., Tabit, K., Idouhli, R., Khadiri, M., Zakir, O., Dikici, B., & Abouelfida, A. (2023). Zeolitization of fumed silica and coal fly ash using the Taguchi method toward organic pollutant removal. Silicon, 15, 61736184.Google Scholar
Ait Baha, A., Ait-Karra, A., Idouhli, R., Tabit, K., Zakir, O., Dikici, B., Khadiri, M.E., & Abouelfida, A. (2024). Synergistic photocatalysis of bayerite/zeolite loaded TiO2 nanocomposites for highly efficient degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous environments. Silicon, 114.Google Scholar
Ajayi, O.A., Adefila, S.S., & Ityokumbul, M.T. (2018). Monitoring zeolite NaY formation from potassium-rich Nigerian kaolinite clay. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9, 16531661.Google Scholar
Akinbodunse, S.J., Ufer, K., Dohrmann, R., & Mikutta, C. (2024). Evaluation of the Rietveld method for determining content and chemical composition of inorganic X-ray amorphous materials in soils. American Mineralogist, 109, 20372051.Google Scholar
Al-Kadhi, N.S., Fotouh, A.E., Kotp, Y.H., Saad, F.A., Shah, R.K., & Rayes, S.M.E. (2024). Utilization of polyvinylpyrrolidone as an organic template for the facile synthesis of analcime nanoparticles for efficient removal of Pb(II) and Cu(II) ions from aqueous media. Silicon, 16, 13871406. SGoogle Scholar
Al-Nahari, S., Laurencin, D., & Alonso, B. (2023). Solvent-free synthesis of zeolites: new insights into the mechanism and non-mechanochemical route. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 350, 112445.Google Scholar
Asselman, K., Vandenabeele, D., Pellens, N., Doppelhammer, N., Kirschhock, C.E.A., & Breynaert, E. (2022). Structural aspects affecting phase selection in inorganic zeolite synthesis. Chemistry of Materials, 34, 1108111092.Google Scholar
Atta, A.Y., Jibril, B.Y., Aderemi, B.O., & Adefila, S.S. (2012). Preparation of analcime from local kaolin and rice husk ash. Applied Clay Science, 61, 813.Google Scholar
Ayele, L., Pérez-Pariente, J., Chebude, Y., & Díaz, I. (2016). Conventional versus alkali fusion synthesis of zeolite A from low grade kaolin. Applied Clay Science, 132–133, 485490.Google Scholar
Azizi, D., Ibsaine, F., Dionne, J., Pasquier, L.C., Coudert, L., & Blais, J.F. (2021). Microporous and macroporous materials state-of-the-art of the technologies in zeolitization of aluminosilicate bearing residues from mining and metallurgical industries: a comprehensive review. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 318, 111029.Google Scholar
Azizi, S.N., & Ehsani Tilami, S. (2013). Framework-incorporated Mn and Co analcime zeolites: Synthesis and characterization. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 198, 138142.Google Scholar
Azizi, S.N., & Yousefpour, M. (2009). Synthesis of aluminum-rich analcime using an ethylene diamine derivative as template. Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, 635, 16541658.Google Scholar
Azizi, S.N., & Yousefpour, M. (2010). Synthesis of zeolites NaA and analcime using rice husk ash as silica source without using organic template. Journal of Materials Science, 45, 56925697.Google Scholar
Baccouche, A., Srasra, E., & El Maaoui, M. (1998). Preparation of Na-P1 and sodalite octahydrate zeolites from interstratified illite–smectite. Applied Clay Science, 13, 255273.Google Scholar
Barata-Rodrigues, P.M., Mays, T.J., & Moggridge, G.D. (2003). Structured carbon adsorbents from clay, zeolite and mesoporous aluminosilicate templates. Carbon, 41, 22312246.Google Scholar
Barthel, H., Rösch, L., and Weis, J. (2005) Fumed Silica - Production, Properties, and Applications. Organosilicon Chemistry Set: From Molecules to Materials, 761778. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Basaldella, E.I., Kikot, A., & Pereira, E. (1990). Synthesis of zeolites from mechanically activated kaolin clays. Reactivity of Solids, 8, 169177.Google Scholar
Belviso, C., Cavalcante, F., Lettino, A., & Fiore, S. (2013). A and X-type zeolites synthesised from kaolinite at low temperature. Applied Clay Science, 80–81, 162168.Google Scholar
Belviso, C., Giannossa, L.C., Huertas, F.J., Lettino, A., Mangone, A., & Fiore, S. (2015). Synthesis of zeolites at low temperatures in fly ash-kaolinite mixtures. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 212, 3547.Google Scholar
Belviso, C., Cavalcante, F., Niceforo, G., & Lettino, A. (2017). Sodalite, faujasite and A-type zeolite from 2:1dioctahedral and 2:1:1 trioctahedral clay minerals. A singular review of synthesis methods through laboratory trials at a low incubation temperature. Powder Technology, 320, 483497.Google Scholar
Bentabol, M., Ruiz Cruz, M.D., Javier Huertas, F., & Linares, J. (2006). Chemical and structural variability of illitic phases formed from kaolinite in hydrothermal conditions. Applied Clay Science, 32, 111124.Google Scholar
Bohor, B.F. (1963). High-temperature phase development in illitic clays. Clays and Clay Minerals, 12, 233246.Google Scholar
Bortolini, H.R., Lima, D.S., & Perez-Lopez, O.W. (2020). Hydrothermal synthesis of analcime without template. Journal of Crystal Growth, 532, 125424.Google Scholar
Brantley, S.L. & Mellott, N.P. (2000). Surface area and porosity of primary silicate minerals. American Mineralogist, 85, 17671783.Google Scholar
Carrado, K.A., Thiyagarajan, P., & Song, K. (1997). A study of organo-hectorite clay crystallization. Clay Minerals, 32, 2940.Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., Xing, J., Bu, C., Zhang, J., Piao, G., Huang, Y., Xie, H., & Wang, X. (2019). Dehydroxylation and structural distortion of kaolinite as a high-temperature sorbent in the furnace. Minerals, 9, 587.Google Scholar
Chiang, A.S.T., Fun, S.Y., Wu, J.S., & Tsai, T.C. (2010). IR and XRD amorphous synthesis residue showing zeolitic micropores. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 1217, 113118.Google Scholar
Chouat, N., Bensafi, B., & Djafri, F. (2022). Post-synthesis fluoride treatment of analcime zeolite synthesized using a novel organic template. Crystalline, textural, and acid study. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 48, 491503.Google Scholar
Csáki, Š., Sunitrová, I., Lukáč, F., Łagód, G., & Trník, A. (2022). Thermal properties of illite-zeolite mixtures up to 1100°C. Materials, 15, 3029.Google Scholar
Cundy, C.S., & Cox, P.A. (2003). The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: history and development from the earliest days to the present time. Chemical Reviews, 103, 663701.Google Scholar
Cundy, C.S., & Cox, P.A. (2005). The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: precursors, intermediates and reaction mechanism. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 82, 178.Google Scholar
Dehmani, Y., Franco, D.S.P., Georgin, J., Lamhasni, T., Brahmi, Y., Oukhrib, R., Mustapha, B., Moussout, H., Ouallal, H., & Sadik, A. (2023). Comparison of phenol adsorption property and mechanism onto different Moroccan clays. Water, 15, 1881.Google Scholar
Den Hartog, S.A.M., Niemeijer, A.R., & Spiers, C.J. (2013). Friction on subduction megathrust faults: beyond the illite–muscovite transition. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 373, 819.Google Scholar
Duan, A., Wan, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Jiang, G., & Liu, J. (2011). Optimal synthesis of micro/mesoporous beta zeolite from kaolin clay and catalytic performance for hydrodesulfurization of diesel. Catalysis Today, 175, 485493.Google Scholar
Dyer, A., Tangkawanit, S., & Rangsriwatananon, K. (2004). Exchange diffusion of Cu2+, Ni2+, Pb2+ and Zn2+ into analcime synthesized from perlite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 75, 273279.Google Scholar
Efimov, A.M., Pogareva, V.G., & Shashkin, A.V. (2003). Water-related bands in the IR absorption spectra of silicate glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 332, 93114.Google Scholar
Fotouh, A.E., Al-Farraj, E.S., Kotp, Y.H., El Rayes, S.M., Elfalleh, W., & Khezami, L. (2024). Facile synthesis of analcime (NaSi2AlO6·H2O) nanoparticles using polyethylene glycol 400 as an organic template for effective removal of Zn(II) and Cd(II) ions from aqueous solutions. Silicon, 117.Google Scholar
Frost, R.L., Kristof, J., Horvath, E., & Kloprogge, J.T. (2000). Rehydration and phase changes of potassium acetate-intercalated halloysite at 298K. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 226, 318327.Google Scholar
Gandhi, D., Bandyopadhyay, R., & Soni, B. (2021). Zeolite Y from kaolin clay of Kachchh, India: synthesis, characterization and catalytic application. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 98, 100246.Google Scholar
García, G., Aguilar-Mamani, W., Carabante, I., Cabrera, S., Hedlund, J., & Mouzon, J. (2015). Preparation of zeolite A with excellent optical properties from clay. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 619, 771777.Google Scholar
García-Villén, F., Flores-Ruíz, E., Verdugo-Escamilla, C., & Huertas, F.J. (2018). Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites using sanitary ware waste as a raw material. Applied Clay Science, 160, 238248.Google Scholar
Gatta, G.D., Nestola, F., & Ballaran, T.B. (2006). Elastic behavior, phase transition, and pressure induced structural evolution of analcime. American Mineralogist, 91, 568578.Google Scholar
Geus, E.R., Den Exter, M.J., & Van Bekkum, H. (1992). Synthesis and characterization of zeolite (MFI) membranes on porous ceramic supports. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, 88, 31013109.Google Scholar
Han, H., Rafiq, M.K., Zhou, T., Xu, R., Mašek, O., & Li, X. (2019). A critical review of clay-based composites with enhanced adsorption performance for metal and organic pollutants. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 369, 780796.Google Scholar
Hegazy, E.Z., El Maksod, I.H.A., & El Enin, R.M.M.A. (2010). Preparation and characterization of Ti and V modified analcime from local kaolin. Applied Clay Science, 49, 149155.Google Scholar
Henderson, C.M.B., Hamilton, D.L., & Waters, J.P. (2014). Phase equilibria in NaAlSiO4–KAlSiO4–SiO2–H2O at 100 MPa pressure: equilibrium leucite composition and the enigma of primary analcime in blairmorites revisited. Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 171202.Google Scholar
Hillier, S. (2000). Accurate quantitative analysis of clay and other minerals in sandstones by XRD: comparison of a Rietveld and a reference intensity ratio (RIR) method and the importance of sample preparation. Clay Minerals, 35, 291302.Google Scholar
Jamil, T.S., & Youssef, H.F. (2016). Microwave synthesis of zeolites from Egyptian kaolin: evaluation of heavy metals removal. Separation Science and Technology, 51, 28762886.Google Scholar
Jena, S.K., Dhawan, N., Rao, D.S., Misra, P.K., Mishra, B.K., & Das, B. (2014). Studies on extraction of potassium values from nepheline syenite. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 133, 1322.Google Scholar
Jha, B., & Singh, D.N. (2011). A review on synthesis, characterization and industrial applications of flyash zeolites. Journal of Materials Education, 33, 12.Google Scholar
Jiang, T., Li, G., Qiu, G., Fan, X., & Huang, Z. (2008). Thermal activation and alkali dissolution of silicon from illite. Applied Clay Science, 40, 8189.Google Scholar
Jin, Y., Liu, Z., Han, L., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Zhu, S., Li, Z.P.J., & Wang, D. (2022). Synthesis of coal-analcime composite from coal gangue and its adsorption performance on heavy metal ions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 423, 127027.Google Scholar
Joseph, I. V., Tosheva, L., Miller, G., & Doyle, A.M. (2021). Fau-type zeolite synthesis from clays and its use for the simultaneous adsorption of five divalent metals from aqueous solutions. Materials, 14.Google Scholar
Joshi, P.N., Thangaraj, A., & Shiralkar, V.P. (1991). Studies on zeolite transformation of high-silica gmelinite into analcime. Zeolites, 11, 164168.Google Scholar
van de Kamp, P.C. (2008). Smectite-illite-muscovite transformations, quartz dissolution, and silica release in shales. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 6681.Google Scholar
Khaleque, A., Alam, M.M., Hoque, M., Mondal, S., Haider, J. Bin, Xu, B., Johir, M.A.H., Karmakar, A.K., Zhou, J.L., Ahmed, M.B., & Moni, M.A. (2020). Zeolite synthesis from low-cost materials and environmental applications: a review. Environmental Advances, 2, 100019.Google Scholar
Kloprogge, J.T., Duong, L.V., & Frost, R.L. (2005). A review of the synthesis and characterisation of pillared clays and related porous materials for cracking of vegetable oils to produce biofuels. Environmental Geology, 47, 967981.Google Scholar
Kropáč, K., Dolníček, Z., & Ulmanová, J. (2024). Paragenesis, composition and origin of Ba- and Ca-rich stronalsite, a rare strontium tectosilicate, in the rocks of the teschenite association, Silesian Unit, Western Carpathians, Czech Republic. Mineralogical Magazine, 141.Google Scholar
Labaied, I., Douzane, O., Promis, G., & Lajili, M. (2023). Synthesis of alkali-activated materials blended with fly ash: optimization of curing conditions and precursor dosage. Journal of Building Engineering, 79, 107863.Google Scholar
Li, J., Gao, M., Yan, W., & Yu, J. (2023a). Regulation of the Si/Al ratios and Al distributions of zeolites and their impact on properties. Chemical Science, 14, 19351959.Google Scholar
Li, Q., Zhang, Y., Cao, Z., Gao, W., & Cui, L. (2010). Influence of synthesis parameters on the crystallinity and Si/Al ratio of NaY zeolite synthesized from kaolin. Petroleum Science, 7, 403409.Google Scholar
Li, R., Chawla, A., Linares, N., Sutjianto, J.G., Chapman, K.W., Martínez, J.G., & Rimer, J.D. (2018). Diverse physical states of amorphous precursors in zeolite sol gel syntheses. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 57, 84608471.Google Scholar
Li, X., Han, S., Xu, J., & Jiang, N. (2023b). Green synthesis of nano-H-ZSM-5 zeolite single-crystal aggregates via an in situ reconstruction of the topology of natural clay. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 350, 112441.Google Scholar
Ma, G., Bai, C., Wang, M., & He, P. (2021). Effects of Si/Al ratios on the bulk-type zeolite formation using synthetic metakaolin-based geopolymer with designated composition. Crystals, 11, 1310.Google Scholar
Ma, X., Yang, J., Ma, H., Liu, C., & Zhang, P. (2015). Synthesis and characterization of analcime using quartz syenite powder by alkali-hydrothermal treatment. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 201, 134140.Google Scholar
Marsh, A., Heath, A., Patureau, P., Evernden, M., & Walker, P. (2018). Alkali activation behaviour of un-calcined montmorillonite and illite clay minerals. Applied Clay Science, 166, 250261.Google Scholar
Martín, D.A., Costafreda, J.L., Costafreda, J.L., & Presa, L. (2022). Improving the performance of mortars made from recycled aggregates by the addition of zeolitised cineritic tuff. Crystals, 12, 77.Google Scholar
Mattioli, M., & Cenni, M. (2020). Mineralogical dataset of natural zeolites from Lessini Mounts, Northern Italy: analcime, natrolite, phillipsite and harmotome chemical composition. Data in Brief, 31, 105791.Google Scholar
McCaleb, S.B. (1962). Hydrothermal products formed from montmorillonite clay systems. Clays and Clay Minerals, 9, 276294.Google Scholar
Meng, X., & Xiao, F.S. (2014). Green routes for synthesis of zeolites. Chemical Reviews, 114, 15211543.Google Scholar
Mezni, M., Hamzaoui, A., Hamdi, N., & Srasra, E. (2011). Synthesis of zeolites from the low-grade Tunisian natural illite by two different methods. Applied Clay Science, 52, 209218.Google Scholar
Mintova, S., & Valtchev, V. (2002). Effect of the silica source on the formation of nanosized silicalite-1: an in situ dynamic light scattering study. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 55, 171179.Google Scholar
Moneim, M.A., & Ahmed, E.A. (2015). Synthesis of faujasite from Egyptian clays: characterizations and removal of heavy metals. Geomaterials, 5, 6876.Google Scholar
Mourak, A., Hajjaji, M., Alagui, A., Martin, P., & Joly, N. (2021). Effects of geomaterial-originated fillers on microstructure and mechanical/physical properties of α-and β-chitosan-based films. Molecules, 26.Google Scholar
Murad, E., & Wagner, U. (1996). The thermal behaviour of an Fe-rich illite. Clay Minerals, 31, 4552.Google Scholar
Murukutti, M.K., & Jena, H. (2022). Synthesis of nano-crystalline zeolite-A and zeolite-X from Indian coal fly ash, its characterization and performance evaluation for the removal of Cs+ and Sr2+ from simulated nuclear waste. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 423, 127085.Google Scholar
Musyoka, N.M., Missengue, R., Kusisakana, M., & Petrik, L.F. (2014). Conversion of South African clays into high quality zeolites. Applied Clay Science, 97–98, 182186.Google Scholar
Novembre, D., & Gimeno, D. (2021). Synthesis and characterization of analcime (ANA) zeolite using a kaolinitic rock. Scientific Reports, 11, 19.Google Scholar
Novembre, D., di Sabatino, B., Gimeno, D., & Pace, C. (2011). Synthesis and characterization of Na-X, Na-A and Na-P zeolites and hydroxysodalite from metakaolinite. Clay Minerals, 46, 339354.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, M. (2014). Rigid, flexible and impossible zeolite and related structures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372.Google Scholar
Osacký, M., Binčík, T., Hudcová, B., Vítková, M., Pálková, H., Hudec, P., Bačík, P., & Czímerová, A. (2017). Low-cost zeolite-based sorbents prepared from industrial perlite by-product material for Zn 2þ and Ni 2þ removal from aqueous solutions: synthesis, properties and sorption efficiency. Heliyon, e12029.Google Scholar
Otieno, S.O., Kengara, F.O., Kemmegne-Mbouguen, J.C., Langmi, H.W., Kowenje, C.B.O., & Mokaya, R. (2019). The effects of metakaolinization and fused-metakaolinization on zeolites synthesized from quartz rich natural clays. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 290, 109668.Google Scholar
Pereira, P.M., Ferreira, B.F., Oliveira, N.P., Nassar, E.J., Ciuffi, K.J., Vicente, M.A., Trujillano, R., Rives, V., Gil, A., Korili, S., & de Faria, E.H. (2018). Synthesis of zeolite A from metakaolin and its application in the adsorption of cationic dyes. Applied Sciences, 8, 608.Google Scholar
Perraki, T., & Orfanoudaki, A. (2004). Mineralogical study of zeolites from Pentalofos area, Thrace, Greece. Applied Clay Science, 25, 916.Google Scholar
Ranjbar Toroghi, M.R., Panahi, M., Karimi, M., Nakhaeipour, A., & Mohammadi, A. (2023). Development of the crystallinity model and investigation of the effective factors on the crystallinity of zeolite Y using the response surface method. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 50, 114.Google Scholar
Rayalu, S.S., Udhoji, J.S., Meshram, S.U., Naidu, R.R., & Devotta, S. (2005). Estimation of crystallinity in flyash-based zeolite-A using XRD and IR spectroscopy. Current Science, 89, 21472151.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, P.E. (2002). The nature, formation, and stability of end-member illite: a hypothesis. American Mineralogist, 87, 103107.Google Scholar
Rubtsova, M., Smirnova, E., Boev, S., Kotelev, M., Cherednichenko, K., Vinokurov, V., Lvov, Y., & Glotov, A. (2022). Nanoarchitectural approach for synthesis of highly crystalline zeolites with a low Si/Al ratio from natural clay nanotubes. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 330, 111622.Google Scholar
Samantray, J., Anand, A., Dash, B., Ghosh, M.K., & Behera, A.K. (2022). Silicate minerals – potential source of potash – a review. Minerals Engineering, 179, 107463.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Hernández, R., López-Delgado, A., Padilla, I., Galindo, R., & López-Andrés, S. (2016). One-step synthesis of NaP1, SOD and ANA from a hazardous aluminum solid waste. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 226, 267277.Google Scholar
Sengupta, P., Saikia, P.C., and Borthakur, P.C. (2008) SEM-EDX characterization of an iron-rich kaolinite clay. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 67, 812818.Google Scholar
Selim, A.Q., Mohamed, E.A., Seliem, M.K., & Zayed, A.M. (2018). Synthesis of sole cancrinite phase from raw muscovite: Characterization and optimization. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 762, 653667.Google Scholar
Sen, M., Dana, K., & Das, N. (2018). Development of LTA zeolite membrane from clay by sonication assisted method at room temperature for H2-CO2 and CO2-CH4 separation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 48, 299310.Google Scholar
Sharma, P., Sutar, P.P., Xiao, H., & Zhang, Q. (2023). The untapped potential of zeolites in techno-augmentation of the biomaterials and food industrial processing operations: a review. Journal of Future Foods, 3, 127141.Google Scholar
Smyth, J.R., & Caporuscio, F.A. (1981). Review of the thermal stability and cation exchange properties of the zeolite minerals clinoptilolite, mordenite, and analcime; applications to radioactive waste isolation in silicic tuff. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, NM.Google Scholar
Sun, L., Xu, X., Sun, D., Chu, S., Chen, J., Shi, W., Lu, J., & Ruan, S. (2022). Synthesis of large single crystals of analcime in a template-free system. CrystEngComm, 24, 40134020.Google Scholar
Tabit, K., Waqif, M., & Saâdi, L. (2019). Application of the Taguchi method to investigate the effects of experimental parameters in hydrothermal synthesis of Na-P1 zeolite from coal fly ash. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 45, 44314447.Google Scholar
Tahmasebipour, M., Khorshidi, N., & Azadmehr, A.R. (2023). Adsorptive behaviour of nepheline syenite as a new adsorbent for removal of Ag (I) and Pb (II) ions from aqueous solution and industrial wastewater. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 103, 155171.Google Scholar
Tironi, A., Trezza, M.A., Irassar, E.F., & Scian, A.N. (2012). Thermal treatment of kaolin: effect on the pozzolanic activity. Procedia Materials Science, 1, 343350.Google Scholar
Tsitsishvili, V., Dolaberidze, N., Nijaradze, M., Mirdzveli, N., Amiridze, Z., Sharashenidze, T., & Gabunia, V. (2021). Application of Georgian natural analcime for production of ion exchangers. InterConf, 574585.Google Scholar
Vaičiukynienė, D., Jakevičius, L., Kantautas, A., Vaitkevičius, V., Vaičiukynas, V., & Dvořák, K. (2021). Conversion d’un sous-produit de silice en zéolites par traitement thermo-sonochimique. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 72, 105426.Google Scholar
Verdel, C., Niemi, N., & van der Pluijm, B.A. (2011). Variations in the illite to muscovite transition related to metamorphic conditions and detrital muscovite content: insight from the Paleozoic passive margin of the Southwestern United States. Journal of Geology, 119, 419437.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Feng, Q., Liu, K., Li, Z., Tang, X., & Li, G. (2017). Highly efficient fluoride adsorption from aqueous solution by nepheline prepared from kaolinite through alkali-hydrothermal process. Journal of Environmental Management, 196, 7279.Google Scholar
Ward, J.W. (1967). The nature of active sites on zeolites. I. The decationated Y zeolite. Journal of Catalysis, 9, 225236.Google Scholar
Yoldi, M., Fuentes-Ordoñez, E.G., Korili, S.A., & Gil, A. (2019). Zeolite synthesis from industrial wastes. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 287, 183191.Google Scholar
Yuan, J., Yang, J., Ma, H., & Liu, C. (2016). Crystal structural transformation and kinetics of NH4+/Na+ ion-exchange in analcime. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 222, 202208.Google Scholar
Yusuf, M.O. (2023). Bond characterization in cementitious material binders using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Applied Sciences, 13, 3353.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Du, S., Wang, Y., & Xue, F. (2024a). Prevention of crystal agglomeration: mechanisms, factors, and impact of additives. Crystals, 14, 676.Google Scholar
Zhang, K., & Ostraat, M.L. (2016). Innovations in hierarchical zeolite synthesis. Catalysis Today, 264, 315.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Zhao, H., Liu, X., Li, R., Xia, T., Ma, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, K., Wang, J., Zeng, P., Liu, H., Liu, C., Gao, X., Xu, C., & Shen, B. (2024b). The isomorphous substitution of Si(4Al) with P in FAU zeolite and its stabilization effect. Chemical Engineering Journal, 486, 150422.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Zhang, T., Lv, Y., Jing, T., Gao, X., Gu, Z., Li, S., Ao, H., & Fang, D. (2024c). Recent progress on the synthesis and applications of zeolites from industrial solid wastes. Catalysts, 14, 734.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Jiang, S., Liu, S., Chen, L., & Tong, L. (2022). Influences of crystallization time and molar composition of hydrogel on the preparation of sodalite, cancrinite and analcime. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, 17, 507518.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Xu, L., Seetharaman, S., Liu, L., Wang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Effects of chemistry and mineral on structural evolution and chemical reactivity of coal gangue during calcination: towards efficient utilization. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 48, 27792793.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Liu, D., Bu, H., Deng, L., Liu, H., Yuan, P., Du, P., & Song, H. (2018). XRD-based quantitative analysis of clay minerals using reference intensity ratios, mineral intensity factors, Rietveld, and full pattern summation methods: a critical review. Solid Earth Sciences, 3, 1629.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Experimental protocols for zeolite synthesis.

Figure 1

Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) raw and (b) calcined clay.

Figure 2

Table 1. Chemical composition of raw clay (wt.%)

Figure 3

Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of raw and calcined clay minerals.

Figure 4

Figure 4. SEM image of (a) raw clay and (b) calcined clay minerals.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Composition of calcined clay minerals.

Figure 6

Figure 6. TG-DTA curves of raw clay.

Figure 7

Figure 7. XRD patterns of the synthesized products by (a) hydrothermal, (b) sonication-mediated hydrothermal, and (c) reflux-mediated hydrothermal processes.

Figure 8

Figure 8. FT-IR spectra of the synthesized products using various hydrothermal routes.

Figure 9

Figure 9. SEM-EDX of the synthesized products by (a) hydrothermal, (b) sonication-mediated hydrothermal, and (c) reflux-mediated hydrothermal processes.

Figure 10

Figure 10. XRD patterns illustrating the effect of NaOH perfusion (a) only, (b) mediated hydrothermal, (c) with fumed silica addition only, and (d) with addition of fumed silica and mediated hydrothermal treatment.

Figure 11

Figure 11. SEM images and EDX analysis of the effect of NaOH pre-fusion: (a) NaOH pre-fusion mediated hydrothermal, and (b) NaOH pre-fusion with the addition of fumed silica and mediated hydrothermal treatment.

Figure 12

Table 2. CEC and BET measurements

Figure 13

Figure 12. BET analysis of the resulting powders.