Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:22:56.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Experimental Study of Cadmium Ion Exchangeability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

R. E. Ferrell Jr.  and
C. A. Price
R. E. Ferrell Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Louisiana State University,,Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803
C. A. Price*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Louisiana State University,,Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803
*
†Department of Geology, University of Sheffield, England (1975-76).
‡Amoco Production Co., New Orleans, Louisiana
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A laboratory study of cadmium exchangeability revealed large differences in extractable cadmium which are dependent on the exchange solution being utilized. The standard exchange solutions employed in this study were: N NaNO3, N NaOAc, N NH4OAc, NCaCl2, and 2N CaCl2, in order of increasing Cd removal. An interpretation of the chemical behavior of Cd and an experiment with mixed sodium nitrate and acetate solutions suggest that cadmium carbonate, octavite, was precipitated when the sediments were saturated with Cd prior to the exchange experiments and that the quantities of Cd recovered in the acetate solutions were erroneously high because of the dissolution of the carbonate material. Dissolution of solid phases, the lack of pH buffering, and the possible formation of a complex hydroxyl chloride salt also made the Cd values obtained with the chloride solutions too high. Sodium nitrate exchange solutions minimize these problems and are thought to best represent the exchangeable cadmium in the sediment.

Резюме

Резюме

Лабораторное изучение обменной способности кадмия обнаружило большие различия в экстрагируемых количествах кадмия,что зависит от раствора, применяемого при обмене.Стандартными обменными растворами,которые использовались при этих исследованиях,были: N,NaNO3, NaOAc,H-NH4OAc, N.СаСl2, и 2N. СаCl2, чтобы увеличить отщепление кадмия.Интерпретация химического поведения Cd и опыт со смешанными растворами азотно-натривой соли и ацетата показали, что карбонат кадмия,октавит,осаждался,в то время как отложения были насыщены кадмием еще до экспериментов обмена и что количество Cd,обнаруженное в ацетатном растворе,было завышено в результате растворения карбонатного материала. Растворение твердых фаз,недостаточное буферное действие pH и возможное образование гидроксильной хлоридной соли также вызывают слишком высокое извлечение Cd,Обменные растворы азотно-натриевой соли сводят к минимуму эти проблемы и,предполагается,правильно определяют обменное количество кадмия в отложениях.

Keywords

AdsorptionCadmiumExchangeIonSedimentary
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 41 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © 1978, The Clay Minerals Society

Footnotes

*

This work is a result of research sponsored by NOAA Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce, under Grant No. 2-35231. The U.S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon.

References

Engler, R. M. Brannon, J. M., Rose, J. R. and Bigham, G. N. (1974) A practical selective extraction procedure for sediment characterization. Symposium on Chemistry of Marine Sediments, ACS Nat. Mtg., Atlantic City, N.J.Google Scholar
Förstner, U. and Müller, G. (1974) Schwermetalle in Flussen und Seen: Springer Verlag, Heidelburg, 225 pp.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. J. (1973) Mechanisms of trace metal transport in rivers. Science 180, 71–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, M. L. (1969) Soil Chemical Analysis: University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis., 895 pp.Google Scholar
John, M. K. (1971) Influence of soil characteristics on adsorption and disorption of cadmium. Environ. Lett. 2, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, J. F. and Kroner, R. C. (1973) Trace metals in waters of the United States: A five-year summary of trace metals in rivers and lakes of the United States (October 1, 1962–September 30, 1967). U.S. Dept. Inter. Fed. Water. Pollut. Control Adm., Div. Pollut. Surv., Cincinnati, Ohio, 75 pp.Google Scholar
Krauskopf, K. B. (1956) Factors controlling the concentrations of thirteen rare metals in sea water. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 9, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langerwerff, J. V. and Brower, D. L. (1972) Exchange adsorption of trace quantities of cadmium in soils treated with chlorides of aluminum, calcium and sodium. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 734–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perhac, R. M. (1973) Sorption and extraction of cadmium from natural materials. Abstracts with Proceedings, GSA 1972 mtg., GAAPBC 5(7), 776.Google Scholar
Sillen, L. G. and Martell, A. E. (1964) Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes: Spec. Publ. No. 17, London, The Chemical Society, Burlington House, W.I. 223 pp.Google Scholar
Wiklander, L. (1964) Cation and anion exchange phenomena. In Chemistry of the Soil (Edited by Bean, F. A.) , Chapter 4. American Chemical Society Monograph, pp. 163–205.Google Scholar