Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:42:28.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Water-Vapor Sorption on Kaolinite: Hysteresis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

R. Torrence Martin*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Detailed water-vapor sorption measurements were made on Li, ISTa, K, Cs and Mg kaolinite at 25°C. When desorption is started from P/P0 near saturation, all ionic modifications show reversible hysteresis. The size and P/P0 range of the hysteresis loop varies with the nature of the exchangeable ion and sample history.

No hysteresis occurs on Li and K kaolinite when desorption is started at P/P0 < 0.8 which along with other data indicates that Li and K exchangeable ions are not truly hydrated below P/P0 = 0.8. The hysteresis for all ionic modifications is traced to hydration of the exchangeable ions. The apparent anomalous position of Li and K ionic hydration is attributed to control of hydration of exchangeable ions by the difference between the hydration energy of the ion minus the specific adsorption energy of the ion for the clay. This difference must be positive before true ionic hydration occurs.

A molecular model for sorption is postulated in which sorption is assumed to take place at specific sorption sites upon the clay surface. The energy of sorption at different sites is believed to be different and also to be a function of the hydration state of the exchangeable ion. By the use of the proposed model and the detailed sorption data, hydration of the different exchangeable ions as a function of the relative vapor pressure can be obtained. The sorption model also predicts phase changes in the sorbed film at certain relative pressures. These calculated phase changes agree very well with phase changes indicated from Jura-Harkins’ plots of the experimental data.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1957

References

Bangham, D. H. (1944) Thermodynamics of sorption isotherms; the hysteresis loop in capillary condensation: Nature, Lond. v. 154, pp. 837838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T. F. and Comer, J. J. (1955) Electron microscopy of clay surfaces: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.—Natl. Res. Council, pub. 395, pp. 125.Google Scholar
Brunauer, S. (1945) The Adsorption of Gases and Vapors, vol. 1: Princeton University- Press, Princeton, 511 p. 394.Google Scholar
Jura, G. and. Harkins, W. D. (1946) Surfaces of solids; XIV: J. Amer. Chem. Soc., v. 68, pp. 19411952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, A. G., Mooney, R. W. and Wood, L. A. (1951) The relation between exchangeable ions and water adsorption on kaolinite: J. Phys. & Colloid Chem., v. 55, pp. 14621474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. T. (1957) Water-vapor sorption on lithium kaolinite: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.—Natl. Res. Council, pub. 566, pp. 2338.Google Scholar
Orchiston, H. I. (1954) Adsorption of water vapor; II, clays at 25°C: Soil Sci., v. 78, pp. 463480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, L. A. (1955) Variations in viscosity of clay—water suspensions of Georgia kaolins: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.—Natl. Res. Council, pub. 395, pp. 246259.Google Scholar