Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T10:08:27.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory of Flocculation, Subsidence and Refiltration Rates of Colloidal Dispersions Flocculated by Polyelectrolytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Victor K. La Mer  and
Robert H. Smellie Jr.
Victor K. La Mer
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York, N.Y, USA
Robert H. Smellie Jr.
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The flocculation and subsequent subsidence of colloidal suspensions are markedly increased by the addition of flocculating agents; for example various starches and recently developed synthetic polymers.

The rate of flocculation depends not only upon the extent of adsorption of the agent (flocculant) but also upon the order of mixing and the character and extent of the subsequent agitation which determines the character of the floc formed. Electrolytes flocculate by reducing the electrostatic repulsions between charged particles, but long chain polymers produce flocs by a bridging mechanism which overcomes electrostatic repulsions.

Quantitative relationships are developed between the optimum concentration of flocculant and the rates of flocculation, subsidence, and particularly rate of filtration through the filter cake.

Type
General Session
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 9 , February 1960 , pp. 295 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1960

References

La Mer, V. K. and Smellie, R. H. (1952) Progress report, Colloidal characteristics and behavior of some Florida phosphate slimes: N.T.O. 3286.Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K. and Smellie, R. H. (1952) Progress report, Colloidal characteristics and behavior of some Florida phosphate slimes: N.Y.O. 3288.Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K. and Smellie, R. H. (1956a) Flocculation, subsidence, and filtration of phosphate slimes, I. General: J. Colloid Sci. v. 11, pp. 704–709.Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K. and Smellie, R. H. (1956b) Flocculation, subsidence and filtration of phosphate slimes, II. Starches as agents for improving flocculation, subsidence, and filtration: J. Colloid Sci., v. 11, pp. 710–719.Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K. and Smellie, R. H. (1956c) Flocculation, subsidence and filtration of phosphate slimes. Subsidence behavior: J. Colloid Sci., v. 11, pp. 720–731.Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K., et al. (1953) Progress report, Colloidal characteristics and behavior of some Florida phosphate slimes: N.Y.O. 3288 (Subsidence Theory). (NOPCO polymers and potential determining ions as yet unpublished.).Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K. et al. (1954a) Preliminary discussion of filtration theory: N.Y.O. 3289.Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K. et al. (1954b) Particle size distribution and specific surface studies on phosphate slimes. Kozeny-Carman equation: Progress Rept. N.Y.O. 7402.Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K. et al. (1956) The preparation and evaluation of superior flocculating agents for phosphate slimes: Progress Rept. N.Y.O. 7403. (Preparation and testing of suspension flocculating agents in respect to molecular weight, hydrolysis, cross linking and salt effects; also dependence upon weight percent solids.).Google Scholar
La Mer, V. K., et al. (1957a) Flocculation, subsidence and filtration of phosphate slimes. Flocculation by gums and polyelectrolytes and their influence on filtration rate: J. Colloid Sci., v. 12, pp. 230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Mer, V. K. et al. (1957b) Flocculation, subsidence and filtration of phosphate slimes. The optimum filtration rate as a function of solid content and specific area: J. Colloid Sci., v. 12, pp. 566–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. H. et al. (1948) J. Phys. Colloid Chem., v. 53, p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, A. S. and Morelos, O. (1955) Ind. Eng. Chem., v. 47, p. 1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruehrwein, R. A. and Ward, D. W. (1952) Mechanism of clay aggregation by polyelectrolytes: Soil Sci., v. 73, pp. 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidegger, A. E. (1957) The Physics of Flow through Porous Media: MacMillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smellie, R. H. Jr. and La Mer, V. K. (1958) Flocculation, subsidence and filtration of phosphate slimes. A quantitative theory of filtration of flocculated suspensions: J. Colloid Sci., v. 13, pp. 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umberger, I. Q. and La Mer, V. K. (1945) The kinetics of diffusion controlled molecular and ionic reactions: J. Amer. Chem. Soc., v. 67, pp. 1099–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verwey, E. J. W. and Overbeek, J. Th. G. (1948) Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids: Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 205 pp.Google Scholar