Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:16:58.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Size and Shape of Clay Particles in Aqueous Suspension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Allan Kahn
Allan Kahn*
Affiliation:
Shell Development Company, Houston, Texas, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The size and shape of clay particles in aqueous suspension have been determined by means of five experimental techniques—electro-optical birefringence, ultracentrifugation, viscometry, optical transmission and electron microscopy. Five clay minerals—montmorillonite, illite, hectorite, nontronite and attapulgite—each subdivided into five size fractions, were studied. The average particle dimensions in each fraction are tabulated.

An evaluation of the experimental techniques is presented. It is concluded that for a preliminary survey of the particle size and shape of clay minerals the technique of electron microscopy is best. However, once a model for the particles is obtained, a combination of the techniques of electro-optical birefringence and viscometry becomes more useful in characterizing the size and shape of the particles in suspension.

Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 6 , February 1957 , pp. 220 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1957

References

Alexander, A. E. and Johnson, P. (1949) Colloid Science, v. 1, Oxford University Press, New York, 554 pp.Google Scholar
Bender, M. (1952) The use of light scattering for determining particle size and molecular weight and shape: J. Chem. Educ., v. 29, pp. 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, H. (1951) The Kerr effect demonstrated by dilute solutions of rigid macro-molecules: Ann. Phys., v. 6, pp. 561–609.Google Scholar
Doty, P. and Steiner, R. F. (1950) Light scattering and spectrophotometry of colloidal solutions: J. Chem. Phys., v. 18, pp. 1211–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, A. and Lewis, D. R. (1954) The size of sodium montmorillonite particles in suspension from electro-optical birefrigence studies: J. Phys. Chem., v. 58, pp. 801804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, O. J. and Shaw, B. T. (1942) Studies of clay particles with the electron microscope: III. Hydrodynamic considerations in relation to shape of particles: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 1, pp. 58–68.Google Scholar
Mark, H. and Tobolsky, A. V. (1950) Physical Chemistry of High Polymeric Systems: Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, 506 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. E. (1949) The Colloid Chemistry of the Silicate Minerals: Academic Press, Inc., New York, 162 pp.Google Scholar
Svedberg, T. and Pederson, K. O. (1940) The Ultracentrifuge: Oxford University Press, New York, 478 pp.Google Scholar
van Olphen, H. (1950) Stabilization of montmorillonite sols by chemical treatment: Rec. de Trav. Pays-Bas, v. 69, pp. 1313–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Olphen, H. (1951) Chemical treatment of drilling fluids: Thesis, Delft.Google Scholar