Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:50:25.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional clay Mineral Patterns in the Gulf of Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Arthur P. Pinsak  and
Haydn H. Murray
Arthur P. Pinsak*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Haydn H. Murray*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
*
1Present address: Indiana Geological Survey, Bloomington, Indiana.
2Present address: Georgia Kaolin Co., Elizabeth, New Jersey.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A semiquantitative study of the surficial clay mineral distribution from 79 cores in the Recent sediments in the Gulf of Mexico shows a regional pattern which can be related to source and environment. The dominant factor controlling distribution of these surflcial sediments appears to be source. Montmorillonite is the most abundant clay mineral, and illite, chlorite, kaolinite and mixed-layer minerals are present in almost every sample.

Alteration of the clay minerals is influenced by (a) change of environment, and (b) length of exposure. Initial ion exchange, which is caused by a tendency to reach equilibrium with a new environment, occurs so rapidly in the clay minerals after they enter the marine environment that rate of sedimentation is a minor factor in comparison to environmental change. Slow alteration and adjustment toward a stable end state are most complete in areas of slow deposition and extended exposure of the clay minerals to the environment.

Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 7 , February 1958 , pp. 162 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1958

References

Bradley, W. F. (1953) Analysis of mixed-layer clay mineral structures: Analyt. Chem., v. 25, pp. 727–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, W. F., Grim, R. E. and Clark, G. L. (1937) x-ray study of montmorillonite: Z. f Krist., v. 97, pp. 216–222.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E. (1953) Clay mineralogy: McGraw-Hill, New York, 384 pp.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E. (1958) Concept of diagenesis in argillaceous sediments: Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, v. 42, pp. 246–253.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E. and Johns, W. D. (1954) Clay mineral investigation of sediments in the northern Gulf of Mexico: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.—Natl. Res. Council, pub. 327, pp. 81–103.Google Scholar
Johns, W. D. and Grim, R. E. (1958) Clay mineral composition of Recent sediments from the Mississippi River Delta: J. Sed. Petrol., v. 28, pp. 186–199.Google Scholar
Johns, W. D., Grim, R. E. and Bradley, W. F. (1954) Quantitative estimations of clay minerals by diffraction methods: J. Sed. Petrol., v. 24, pp. 242–251.Google Scholar
Keller, W. D. (1956) Clay minerals and environment: Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, v. 40, pp. 2689–2710.Google Scholar
Milne, I. H. and Earley, J. W. (1958) Effect of source and environment on clay minerals: Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, v. 42, pp. 328–338.Google Scholar
Murray, H. H. and Harrison, J. L. (1956) Clay mineral composition of Recent sediments from Sigsbee Deep: J. Sed. Petrol., v. 26, pp. 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, H. H. and Leininger, R. K. (1956) Effect of weathering on clay minerals: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.—Natl. Res. Council, pub. 456, pp. 340–347.Google Scholar
Powers, M. C. (1957) Adjustment of land derived clays to the marine environment: J. Sed. Petrol., v. 27, pp. 355–372.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. (1958) Geologic interpretation of argillaceous sediments. I. Origin and significance of clay minerals in sedimentary rocks: Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, v. 42, pp. 254–271.Google Scholar