Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:54:37.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reactions of Feldspar and Mica with Water at Low Temperature and Pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

R. M. Garrels
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Peter Howard
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Muscovite and K-feldspar (adularia) were dry-ground to — 200/inch particles, which were suspended in water. These suspensions were “titrated” with KCl, and the pH was recorded as a function of KCl concentration and temperature. The results indicate that muscovite and adularia react with water to produce a surface film in which H+ has displaced K+. The “titration” curves show some characteristics attributable to exchange reactions, others apparently related to equilibria among solids of fixed composition. Maximum release of K+ from adularia by reaction with water is much greater than that from mica. The interpretation is made that the first result of reaction of mica and adularia with water is a surface layer that grades from an outer portion that is structurally disrupted to an inner portion that retains the original silicate structure but with H+ substituted for K+. Addition of K+ as KCl to the suspending solution displaces H+ from the disrupted zone, but all H+ originally taken up by the solids was not returned to the solution by concentrations of KCl up to 1.0 M. Experiments were of a few hours duration; work by others has shown that the disrupted zone releases appreciable concentrations of silica and alumina to solution over longer time intervals.

These hydrolysis experiments indicate that at 25°C an H-feldspar or H-mica structure is favored over a K-feldspar or K-mica structure except in solutions in which the ratio of aK+ aH+ exceeds 109–10 or 107–8 respectively. These ratios decrease in the temperature range 25-65°C by a factor of about 100.7. These results, where considered in relation to the observed behavior of feldspar and mica under weathering conditions, indicate that the major energy change for the reactions, $2\,mica + 5{H_2}O = \,3\,kaolin + \,2{K^ + }\, + \,2O{H^ - }$$3K - feldspar + 2{H_2}O = \,K - mica + 6quartz + \,2O{H^ - }$ can be considered to result from H+-K+ exchange, and that the energy contribution from other changes is small.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1957

References

Armstrong, L. C. (1940) Decomposition and alteration of feldspars and spodumene by water: Amer. Min., v. 25, pp. 810820.Google Scholar
Correns, C. W. and Engelhardt, Wolf Von (1938) Neue Untersuchungen über die Verwitterung des Kalifeldspates: Chemie der Erde, v. 12, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Gruner, J. W. (1944) The hydrothermal alteration of feldspars in acid solutions between 300° and 400°C: Econ. Geol., v. 39, pp. 578589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harned, H. S. and Owen, B. B. (1950) The Physical Chemistry of Electrolytic Solutions: Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, 645 pp.Google Scholar
Lovering, T. S. (1950) The geochemistry of argillic and related types of rock alteration: 75th Anniv. Volume, Colo. School Mines Quart., v. 45, pp. 231260.Google Scholar
Mitra, R. P. and Rajagopalan, K. S. (1948) Titration curves of hydrogen micas: Nature, Lond. v. 162, pp. 104105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morey, G. W. and Chen, W. T. (1955) The action of hot water on some feldspars: Amer. Min., v. 40, pp. 9961000.Google Scholar
Nash, V. E. and Marshall, C. E. (1956a) The surface reactions of silicate minerals, Part I. The reactions of feldspar surfaces with acidic solutions: Univ. Missouri Coll. Agr. Res. Bull. 613, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Nash, V. E. and Marshall, C. E. (1956b) The surface reactions of silicate minerals, Part II. Reactions of feldspar surfaces with salt solutions: Univ. Missouri Coll. Agr. Res. Bull. 614, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Sales, R. H. and Meyer, Charles (1950) Interpretation of wall-rock alteration at Butte, Montana: 75th Anniv. volume, Colo. School Mines Quart., v. 45, pp. 261273.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. M. (1955) Hydrothermal alteration as a guide to ore: Econ. Geol., 50th Anniv. volume, pp. 300323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamm, Olof (1930) Experimentelle Studien über die Verwitterung und Tonbildung von Feldspäten: Chemie der Erde, v. 4, pp. 420430.Google Scholar