Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:38:29.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrothermal Alteration in Some Granodiorites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Charles Meyer
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
Julian Hemley
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The patterns of distribution of the mica and clay minerals resulting from alteration of feldspars are much less regular and well defined in the “porphyry copper” deposits than in the vein deposits such as those at Butte, Montana. There are, however, interpretative problems common to both. Chemically, the destruction of the K-feldspars may be interpreted in the light of laboratory investigations of the system potash-alumina-silica-water at various K+/H+ ratios. The experiments indicate that the K-mica (sericite) stability field lies between the K-feldspar and kaolinite fields. The K-mica field is approximately 1.5 pH unit wide, and its boundaries with K-feldspar and kaolinite are parallel below 500°C. The boundaries slope toward higher K+/H+ ratios at lower temporatures. Thus, considering the. K-feldspar—sericite—kaolinite system of minerals, one might expect field patterns showing a central zone of kaolinite bordered by a zone of K-mica which in turn grades outward into unaltered K-feidspar. Such a pattern is demonstrated by Butte’s inner diekite-kaolinite and sericite and possibly by the zoning at San Manuel described by Schwartz. Alteration of plagioclase introduces additional complications into the distribution patterns of clay and mica minerals, the chief of which is the outer argillic zone so characteristic of both vein and disseminated deposits.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1957

References

Anderson, C. A. (1950) Altoration and metallization in the Bagdad porphyry copper deposit, Arizona: Econ. Geol., v. 45, pp. 609628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilluly, James (1946) The Ajo mining district, Arizona: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 209, 112 pp.Google Scholar
Hemley, J. J. (1958) Some mineralogical equilibria in the system K2O—A12O3—SiO2-HaO: unpublished thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kerr, P. F., Kulp, J. L., Patterson, C. M„ and Wright, R. J. (1950) Hydrothermal alteration at Santa Rita, New Mexico: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v. 61, pp. 275347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovering, T. S. (1941) The origin of the tungsten ores of Boulder County, Colorado: Econ. Geol, v. 36, pp. 229279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovering, T. S. (1950) The geochemistry of argillic and related types of rock alteration: Golo School Mines Quart., v. 45, pp. 231260.Google Scholar
Perry, V. D. (1952) Geology of the Chuquicamata Orebody: Amer. Inst. Min. & Met., Eng., Mining Engr., v. 4, pp. 11661168.Google Scholar
Peterson, N. P., Gilbert, C. M., and Quick, G. L. (1951) Geology and ore deposits of the Castle Dome area, Gila County, Arizona: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 971, 134 pp.Google Scholar
Sales, R. H., and Meyer, Charles (1948) Wall rock alteration, Butte, Montana: Amer. Inst. Min. & Met. Eng. Trans., v. 178, pp. 935.Google Scholar
Sales, R. H., and Meyer, Charles (1956) Genetic significances of quartz-molybdenite mineralization in the Butte, District, Montana (abs.): Econ. Geol., v. 51, p. 126.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. M. (1947) Hydrothermal alteration in the “ porphyry copper “ deposits: Econ. Geol., v. 41, pp. 319352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, G. M. (1953) Geology of the San Manuel copper deposit, Arizona: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 256, 65 pp.Google Scholar
Stringham, Bronson (1953) Granitization and hydrothermal alteration at Bingham, Utah: Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., v. 64, pp. 945991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooker, E. W. (1956) Altered wall rocks along vein deposits in the Central City—Idaho Springs region, Colorado: in Clays and, Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci-Natl. Res. Council, pub. 456, pp. 348361.Google Scholar
Vanderwilt, J. W., and King, R. V. (1955) Hydrothermal alteration at the Climax molybdenum deposit: Amer. Inst. Min. & Met. Eng. Trans., v. 7, pp. 4553.Google Scholar
Yoder, H. S., and Eugster, H. P. (1955) Synthetic and natural muscovites: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 8, pp. 225280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar