Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:48:09.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geology, Mineralogy, and Genesis of Selected Fireclays from Latah County, Idaho

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Herman Ponder
Affiliation:
A. P. Green Fire Brick Company, Mexico, Missouri, USA
W. D. Keller
Affiliation:
A. P. Green Fire Brick Company, Mexico, Missouri, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fireclay deposits occur in Latah County, Idaho, as residual weathered products, and as lacustrine sediments comprising part of the Miocene Latah formation. The residual deposits were developed upon granitic (granodioritic, gneissic) masses by surface weathering. The lacustrine fireclays were derived dominantly from weathered residuum and to a minor extent from volcanic ash.

Mineral proportions in the residual clay are typically as follows: kaolin minerals, 65 percent; quartz, 20 percent; K-bearing micas, 12 percent; and montmorillonite-chlorite mixed-layer clay, trace.

The sedimentary fireclay deposits range widely in clay content, from some that are almost wholly kaolin to others containing as little clay as the residual material, or alternatively, to those meeting minimal requirements of fireclay. As the content of kaolin decreases in the deposits, there is a corresponding increase in content of quartz, K-bearing micas, and in the less abundant components orthoclase, mixed-layer illite— montmorillonite, and mixed-layer chlorite—montmorillonite.

In both the transported and residual clay bodies the kaolin minerals are, in order of decreasing abundance, halloysite, endellite, and fireclay mineral.

The lake deposits also contain seams of poorly crystallized kaolin that is inferred to have been derived from volcanic ash because (1) it contains minor quantities of tridymite, sanidine, and volcanic glass, and (2) it contains notably more endellite and allophane (amorphous and relatively soluble in NaOH) than is present in the other kaolin deposits. Endellite seemingly has developed in two separate geologic environments: as an alteration product of granodiorite gneiss by surface weathering and as an alteration product of volcanic ash deposited and altered in a fresh-water lake. It is postulated that endellite is a relatively common product of weathering.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1959

References

Berry, E. W. (1928) A revision of the flora of the Latah formation: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 154-H, pp. 225266.Google Scholar
Berry, E. W. (1934) Miocene plants from Idaho: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 185-E, pp. 97125.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. W. and Robinson, K. (1947) An x-ray study of some kaolinitic fireclays: Trans. Ceram. Soc., v. 46, pp. 4962.Google Scholar
Correns, D. W. (1949) Einführung in die Mineralogie: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 414 pp., non vidi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, I. and Jackson, M. L. (1960) Rapid dissolution of allophane and kaolinite- halloysite after dehydration: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. Seventh Nat'l. Conf., Pergamon Press, London, pp. 102113.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. H. (1947) Igneous metamorphism in the Orofino region, Idaho: J. Geol., v. 55, pp. 450507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, W. D. (1956) Clay minerals as influenced by environments of their formation: Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., v. 40, pp. 26892710.Google Scholar
Keller, W. D. (1957) The principles of chemical weathering: Lucas Brothers, Columbia, Missouri, 111 pp.Google Scholar
Keller, W. D. (1958) Argillation and direct bauxitization in terms of concentrations of hydrogen and metal cations at surface of hydrolyzing aluminum silicates: Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., v. 42, pp. 233245.Google Scholar
Knowlton, F. H. (1926) Flora of the Latah formation of Spokane, Washington, and Coeur d'Alene, Idaho: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 140, pp. 1781.Google Scholar
Krauskopf, K. B. (1956) Dissolution and precipitation of silica at low temperatures: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, v. 10, pp. 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sand, L. B. and Bates, T. F. (1953) Quantitative analysis of endellite, halloysite and kaolinite by differential thermal analysis: Amer. Min., v. 38, pp. 271278.Google Scholar
Scheid, V. E. (1945) Preliminary report, Excelsior high-alumina clay deposits, Spokane County, Washington: U.S. Geol. Survey Strategic Min. Inv., p. 16.Google Scholar
Scheid, V. E. (1950) Preliminary report, Geologic setting of the clay deposits of Latah County, Idaho, and adjacent areas: Open Files, Idaho Bureau of Mines, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. E. and Carrón, M. K. (1948) Simple field test for distinguishing minerals by abrasion pH: Amer. Min., v. 33, pp. 3149.Google Scholar
Tullís, E. L. (1944) Contributions to the geology of Latah County, Idaho: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v. 55, pp. 131163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullis, E. L. and Laney, F. B. (1933) The composition and origin, of certain commercial clays of northern Idaho: Econ. Geol., v. 28, pp. 480495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar