Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:23:41.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrokinetic Properties of Lime-Treated Bentonites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Clara Ho  and
R. L. Handy
Clara Ho
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
R. L. Handy
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Zeta-potentials of Na- and Ca-bentonites treated with varying amounts of Ca(OH)2 were measured by a Northrop-Kunitz horizontal cell and non-polarizing Zn-ZnSO4 electrodes. Influences of other factors such as particle size, clay concentration, and salt concentrations were also studied.

The results indicate a four-stage change in zeta-potential and viscosity when Ca(OH)2 is added in increasing amounts to Na-bentonite suspensions

In the first stage, the addition of small amounts of lime caused no change in zeta-potential suggesting a counteracting effect of Ca++ adsorbtion and reaction of OH-ions to increase the negative surface charge with only a slight change in viscosity. In the second stage, the addition of more lime resulted in a rapid decrease in zeta-potential accompanied by a rapid increase in viscosity and appearance of flocs. In the third stage, additional lime led to a slower decrease in zeta-potential but a continued rapid increase in viscosity and the formation of distinct large flocs. Apparently in all three stages the plentiful OH- ions caused dissociation of weakly acidic groups to provide additional negative sites for linking the clay particles by Ca++ ions. The dissociation of weakly acidic groups probably reached its full capacity by the end of the third stage, termed the “lime retention point”. In the fourth stage, the additional Ca(OH)2 in excess of the lime retention point caused a slight change in zeta-potential and a slight decrease in viscosity. In this stage free lime was available for slow pozzolanic reaction.

In the Ca-bentonite-Ca(OH), system, the first stage was an increase in zeta-potential due to dominant influence of OH- potential-determining ions. The second stage was a rapid decrease in zeta-potential and increase in viscosity, corresponding to the third stage in treatment in the Na+-clay. The end of the second stage is the lime retention point, after which excess lime is used for pozzolanic reaction.

Type
General
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 12 , February 1963 , pp. 267 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1963

Footnotes

Contribution No. 63-19 of the Soil Research Laboratory.

References

Abramson, H. A. (1934) Electrokinetic phenomena and their application to biology medicine: The Chemical Catalog Co., New York, 331 pp.Google Scholar
Booth, F. (1948) Surface conductance and cataphoresis: Trans. Faraday Soc., v. 44, pp. 955–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, F. (1950) The cataphoresis of spherical, solid non-conducting particles in a symmetrical electrolyte: Proc. Roy. Soc. London, v. A 203, pp. 514–533.Google Scholar
Henry, D. C. (1948) The electrophoresis of suspended particles. IV. The surface conductivity effect: Trans. Faraday Soc., v. 44, pp. 1021–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilt, G. H., and Davidson, D. T. (1960) Lime fixation in clayey soils: Highway Res. Board Bull., v. 262, pp. 20–32.Google Scholar
Ho, C., and Handy, R. L. (1963) Characteristics of lime retention by montmorillonitic clays: Presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Highway Res. Board, NAS-NRC, Washington 25, D.C.Google Scholar
Lin, C. (1959) Sorption capacities, ion saturation and neutralization mechanisms of clay and soils: Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Soils, N.C. State College, Raleigh, N.C., 99 pp.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K. (1949) The effect of pH on electric charges carried by clay particles: Jour. of Soil Sci., v. 2, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K., and Samson, H. R. (1953) Deflocculation of kaolinite suspensions and the accompanying change-over from positive to negative chloride adsorption: Clay Minerals Bull., v. 2, pp. 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, R. K., and Samson, H. R. (1954) Flocculation of kaolinite due to the attraction of positively charged crystal faces: Dis. Faraday Soc., v. 18, pp. 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoluchowski, M. (1914) Graetz Handbuch der Elecktrizitat und des Magnetismum: J. A. Barth, Liepzig , v. 2.Google Scholar
Steele, J. G., and Bradfield, R. (1934) The significance of size distribution in the clay fraction: Amer. Soil Survey Assoc. Bull., v. 15, pp. 88–93.Google Scholar
Street, N. (1957) Surface conductance and thixotropy: Aust. J. Chem., v. 10, pp. 207–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, N., and Buchanan, A. S. (1956) The zeta-potential of kaolinite particles: Aust. J. Chem., v. 9, pp. 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar