Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:20:55.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clay Mineralogy of Mississippian Strata of Southeast Iowa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

John B. Hayes*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Clay mineral suites were extracted from 125 biocalcarenites, dolomites, mudstones and arenaceous rocks from the marine Keokuk, Warsaw and Salem formations of Mississippian age from southeast Iowa and nearby portions of Illinois and Missouri. Well crystallized illite, 2M1 polytype, randomly interstratified illite—montmorillonite, and quartz are in all clay suites. In the south part of the area, trioctahedral chlorite is absent or rare in Keokuk rocks, but is increasingly abundant upward in the section. Kaolinite is confined to the upper part of the section. In the north part of the area, the same upward order of appearance prevails, but the first appearances of chlorite and kaolinite are shifted downward in the stratigraphic section. This distribution of clay minerals is similar to that found by investigators in other areas: kaolinite confined near shore, chlorite in an intermediate position and illite concentrated farther from shore. Clay mineral evidence, combined with petrographic and stratigraphic data, strongly indicates that the type Mississippian strata of southeast Iowa were deposited in a southward regressing epicontinental sea.

Vermiculite and abundant mixed-layer illite-montmorillonite, weathering products of chlorite and illite, respectively, mark a local unconformity between lower and upper members of the Warsaw Formation on the crest of the Warsaw Anticline.

Type
General Sessions
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1961

References

Bell, A. E. (1932) Structure and oil possibilities of the Warsaw area, Hancock County, Illinois: Ill. Geol. Surv., Ill. Petroleum, no. 24, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Bradley, W. F. (1954) X-ray diffraction criteria for the characterization of chloritic material in sediments: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Nat. Acad. Sci.-Nat. Res. Council, pub. 327, pp. 324334.Google Scholar
Dalton, J. A., Swineford, Ada, and Jewett, J. M. (1958) Clay minerals at a Pennsylvanian disconformity: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Nat. Acad. Sci.-Nat. Res. Council, pub. 566, pp. 242252.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1956) Soil Chemical Analysis—Advanced Course: published by the author, Madison, Wisconsin, 991 pp.Google Scholar
Murray, E. H. (1954) Genesis of clay minerals in some Pennsylvanian shales of Indiana and Illinois: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Nat. Acad. Sci.-Nat. Res. Council, pub. 327, pp. 4767.Google Scholar
Smith, J. V. and Yoder, H. S. (1956) Experimental and theoretical studies of the mica polymorphs: Min, Mag., v. 31, pp. 209235.Google Scholar
Van Tuyl, F. M. (1925) The stratigraphy of the Mississippian formations of Iowa: Iowa Geol. Survey Ann. Rept., v. 30, pp. 33349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. E. (1958a) A discussion on the origin of clay minerals in sedimentary rocks: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Nat. Acad. Sci.-Nat. Res. Council, pub. 566, pp. 159173.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. (1958b) Geologic interpretation of argillaceous sediments; Part 1. Origin and significance of clay minerals in sedimentary rocks: Amer. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 42, pp. 254271.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E. (1960) Possible uses of clay minerals in the search for oil: in Clays and Clay Minerals, v. 8, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 214227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar