Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:39:19.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clay Formation and Accumulation in Selected Oklahoma Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Fenton Gray ,
L. W. Reed  and
H. D. Molthan
Fenton Gray
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla, USA
L. W. Reed
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla, USA
H. D. Molthan
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The clay minerals were studied from eleven soil profiles representing three Great Groups of eastern and central Oklahoma. Montmorillonite and illite type clay minerals were found to be the dominant minerals; montmorillonite dominates the fine clays; illite is the chief constituent of the coarse clays. The fine clays dominated the clay fraction of most horizons, including the parent material. The results of the investigation indicate that the present régime of soil formation has had little effect in altering the clay minerals of the soil from those present in the original sediments.

Type
General Session
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 11 , February 1962 , pp. 211 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1962

Footnotes

Research reported in this publication was done under Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Project Number 868, and was presented at the Eighth Conference, in Norman, Okla.

References

Dyal, R. S., and Hendricks, S. B. (1950) Total surface of clays in polar liquids as a characteristic index: Soil Sci., v. 69, pp. 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanning, C. D., and Gray, Fenton (1959) Characterization and genetic study of a Dennis and a Parsons soil: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 23, pp. 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, F., and Galloway, H. M. (1959) Soils of Oklahoma, Okla. Agric. Exp. Sta. MP 56.Google Scholar
Hall, W. T. (1937) Textbook of Quantitative Analysis (2nd ed.), pp. 225–230, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958) Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., Whittig, L. D., Vandenttenvel, R. C., Kaufman, A., and Brown, B. E. (1954) Some analyses of soil montmorin, vermiculite, mica, chlorite, and inter-stratified layer silicates. Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.-Natl. Res. Council, Pub. 327, pp. 218–240.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., Whittig, L. D., and Pennington, R. P. (1949) Segregation procedure for the mineralogical analysis of soils: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., ν.14, pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
Jarvis, N. L., Ellis, R., and Bidwell, D. W. (1959) A chemical and mineralogical characterization of selected Brunizem, Reddish Prairie, Grumusol, and Planosol soils developed in Pre-Pleistocene materials: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 23, pp. 234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunze, G. W., Templin, E. H., and Page, J. B. (1955) The clay mineral composition of representative soils from five geological regions of Texas: Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.—Natl. Res. Council, Pub. 395, pp. 373–383.Google Scholar
Martin, R. T. (1955) Ethylene glycol retention by clays: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 19, pp. 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molthan, H. D. (1960) A chemical and mineralogical characterization and genesis study of the Zaneis and Kingfisher soil series of the Reddish Prairie great soil group. Master of Science thesis, Okla. State Univ.Google Scholar
Peech, M., Alexander, L. T., Dean, T. A., and Reed, J. F. (1947) Methods of soil analysis for soil fertility investigations: U.S.D.A. Circ. No. 757.Google Scholar
Schollenberger, C. J. (1931) Determination of organic matter: Soil Sci., v. 31, pp. 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J. G., and Bradfield, R. (1943) The significance of size distribution in clay fractions: Amer. Soil Survey Assoc., Bull. 15, pp. 89–93.Google Scholar
Whitt, D. M., and Baver, L. D. (1937) Particle size in relation to base exchange and hydrogen properties of Putnam clay: J. Amer. Soc. Agron., v. 29, pp. 906–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G. E., and Gray, Fenton (1954) A clay mineralogical study of certain Reddish Prairie soils of Oklahoma, with an estimation of the montmorillonite and illite content: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v. 18, pp. 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar