Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T21:26:42.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Altered Siliceous Volcanics as a Source of Refractory Clay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

L. B. Sand  and
L. L. Ames Jr.
L. B. Sand*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
L. L. Ames Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
*
1Present address: Tem-Pres, Inc., State College, Pa.
2Present address: General Electric Research Laboratories, Richland, Wash.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the intermountain states, a region deficient in kaolinite and alumina clays, there is an increasing demand for refractory clay. In this arid region residual kaolins are not developed in quantity from feldspathic intrusives. Glassy, siliceous extrusives alter commonly to mont-morillonite of the montmorillonite-beidellite series. Zeolites, principally analcime and heu-landite, often are alteration products. Under certain conditions kaolinite, halloysite, or saponite will form; several tuffaceous deposits were investigated in an attempt to determine these environmental conditions, especially the physico-chemical environment necessary to produce kaolin clay.

Zeolites are developed where the pyroclastics are deposited in an alkaline lake; saponite is formed locally in this environment as a result of hot-spring activity. On river slopes and spurs the siliceous volcanics alter to kaolinite and montmorillonite; where associated with calcareous hot-spring activity in a fresh-water lake, halloysite results. Montmorillonite-beidellite develops where these special conditions do not obtain.

The prospects of finding a residual kaolinite deposit developed from siliceous volcanics are not good. Hydrothermal alteration appears to be the only means by which a siliceous volcanic will be converted to a sizeable refractory clay deposit in this region.

Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 5 , February 1956 , pp. 39 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1956

References

References Cited

Ames, L. L. Jr., Sand, L. B., and Goldich, S. S., 1956, Contribution on the Hector, California, bentonite deposit (Abstract): Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v. 67, p. 1665.Google Scholar
Bramlette, M. N., and Posnjak, E., 1933, Zeolitic alteration of pyroclastics: Amer. Min., v. 18, p. 167–171.Google Scholar
Dietrich, W. F., 1928, The clay resources and the ceramic industry of California; Calif. Div. of Mines Bull. 99, 383 p.Google Scholar
Hampel, B. F., and Cutler, I. B., 1953, Some ceramic properties of halloysite: J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., v. 36, p. 30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, P. F., and Cameron, E. N., 1936, Fullers earth of bentonitic origin from Tehachapi, California: Amer. Min., v. 21, p. 230–237.Google Scholar
Kirkham, V. R. D., 1931, Igneous geology of southwest Idaho: J. Geol., v. 39, p. 564–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Rustum, and Sand, L. B., 1956, A note on some properties of synthetic montmorillonites: Amer. Min., v. 41, p. 505–509.Google Scholar
Sand, L. B., and Ames, L. L. Jr., 1956, Intermediate structures as a probable factor in halloysite genesis (Abstract): Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v. 67, p. 1731.Google Scholar
Schroter, G. A., and Campbell, Ian, 1942, Geological features of some deposits of bleaching clay: Trans. A.I.M.M.E., v. 148, p. 178–208.Google Scholar
Shannon, E. V., 1925, The so-called halloysite of Jones Falls, Md.: Amer. Min., v. 10, p. 159161.Google Scholar
Stringham, B., and Sharp, B. J., 1950, The Fox clay deposit, Utah: Amer. J. Sci., v. 248, p. 726–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. A., Steward, R. M., Gay, T. E. Jr., and Hazenbush, G. C., 1953, Mines and mine deposits of San Bernardino Co., Calif.: Calif. J. of Mines and Geol., v. 49, p. 49–192.Google Scholar