Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:40:39.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinetics of the Thermal Dehydration of Hydrous Silicates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

J. Birch Holt ,
Ivan B. Cutler  and
Milton E. Wadsworth
J. Birch Holt
Affiliation:
Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
Ivan B. Cutler
Affiliation:
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Milton E. Wadsworth
Affiliation:
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Generally, the rate of dehydroxylation of clay minerals may be controlled by reaction at the interface between the decomposed and undecomposed mineral, diffusion through the decomposed phase and/or nucleation of the decomposed phase. Only in rare instances are mineral decomposition reactions homogenous. Some examples are presented to illustrate these principles.

For macrocrystalline muscovite the initial sample weight rather than the external surface area was found to be a parameter of the rate of weight loss. Upon grinding the muscovite to particles smaller than — 65 mesh, an internal surface area factor strongly influenced the rate. This surface area was related to dislocations shown to be present in muscovite.

A rate equation is presented that explains the observed weight loss versus logarithm of time dependence based on a model involving a systematic relief of strain during dehydration.

The rate equation for pyrophyllite was exactly the same as that formulated for muscovite. As with muscovite there was a change in free energy of activation throughout the dehydration process. In contradiction to muscovite, the contribution to the free energy of activation was at least partly enthalpy while with muscovite it was an entropy of activation contribution.

The dehydration of kaolinite was carried out in vacuum. At pressures of one micron the reaction was found to be diffusion controlled with hydroxyl ions as the likely diffusing species.

Type
Symposium on High Temperature Transformations
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 12 , February 1963 , pp. 55 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1963

References

Amelinckx, S. and Delavignette, P. (1962) Dislocations in layer structure: in Direct Observations of Imperfections in Crystals, Interscience Publishers, New York London.Google Scholar
Billy, M. and Valensi, G. (1955) The kinetics of the formation of β silver sulphide and its relation to phenomena of electrochemical corrosion: in Proc. of the Sixth Meeting Inter. Com. Electrochem., Thermo., and Kinetics, 371, Butterworth Scientific Publ.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. W. and Nakahira, M. (1957) Kinetics of dehydroxylation of kaolinite and halloysite: in J. Am. Ceram. Soc., v. 40, p. 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. E. (1961) Kinetic model for solid-state reactions: in J. Chem. Phys., v. 34, p. 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, M. A. and Oblad, A. G. (1953) Dynamic mechanism of heterogeneous catalysis: in Ind. Eng. Chem.r v. 45, p. 1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandeeva, V. A., Zhabrova, G. M. and Kushnerev, M. Y. (1959) A kinetic, an adsorption, and an X-ray crystallographic study of the decomposition of magnesium carbonate: in Proc, Acad, of Sci., Phys. Chem. Soc., U.S.S.R.Google Scholar
Garner, W. E. (1955) Chemistry of the Solid State: Butterworth Scientific Publ.Google Scholar
Glasstone, S., Laidler, K. J. and Eyring, H. (1941) Theory of rate processes: in Kinetics of Chemical Reactions, Viscosity, Diffusion, and Electrochemical Phenomena, McGraw-Hill, New York, 611pp.Google Scholar
Holt, J. V., Cutler, I. B. and Wadsworth, M. E. (1958) Rate of thermal dehydration of muscovite: in J. Am. Ceram. Soc., v. 41, p. 7.Google Scholar
Holt, J. V., Cutler, I. B, and Wadsworth, M. E. (1962) Thermal dehydration of kaolinite in vacuum: in J. Am. Chem. Soc., v. 45, p. 133.Google Scholar
Hyatt, E. P., Cutler, I. B. and Wadsworth, M. E. (1956) An apparatus for thermogravimetric analyses: in Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., v. 35.Google Scholar
Jander, W. (1937) Reactions in the solid state at high temperatures I. Rate of reaction for an endothermic change: in Z. Anorg. U. Allgen. Chem., v. 163, p. 1.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. and Mehl, R. F. (1939) Reaction kinetics in processes of nucleation and growth: in Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Met. Eng. v. 135, p. 416.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R. C. and Milne, A. A. (1953) The effect of grinding on micas: in. Mineral. Mag., v. 30, p. 178.Google Scholar
Milliken, T. H. Jr., Mills, G. A. and Oblad, A. G. (1950). Chemical characteristics and structure of cracking catalysts: in Disc. Far, Soc., v. 8-9, p. 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, P. and White, J, (1949) Kinetics of thermal dehydration of clays: in Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc., v. 48, p. 187.Google Scholar
Murray, P. and White, J. (1955) Kinetics of thermal dehydration of clays: I. Dehydration characteristics of the clay minerals; II. Isothermal decomposition of the clay mineral; IV. Interpretation of differential thermal analysis of the clay mineral; in Trans. Brit. Cer. Soc., v. 54, pp. 137, 189, 204, respectively.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. A. and Thon, N. J. (1952) Kinetics of chemisorption: in J. Am. Chem. Soc., v. 74, p. 4169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toussaint, F., Firpiat, J. J. and Gostuche, M. C. (1963) Dehydroxylation of kaolinite. I. Kinetics: in Phys. Chem., v. 67, p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar