Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:25:57.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zeolitized tuffs in pedotechniques to improve soil resilience against the impact of treatment by municipal sewage: balance of nutrient and noxious cations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

G. F. Capra ,
A. Buondonno ,
E. Coppola ,
M. G. Duras ,
S. Vacca  and
C. Colella
G. F. Capra*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Botaniche, Ecologiche e Geologiche, Università di Sassari, Nuoro, Via Colombo 1, Località Sa Terra Mala, 08100 Nuoro, Italy
A. Buondonno
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Seconda Università di Napoli, Caserta, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
E. Coppola
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Seconda Università di Napoli, Caserta, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
M. G. Duras
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Botaniche, Ecologiche e Geologiche, Università di Sassari, Nuoro, Via Colombo 1, Località Sa Terra Mala, 08100 Nuoro, Italy
S. Vacca
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Botaniche, Ecologiche e Geologiche, Università di Sassari, Nuoro, Via Colombo 1, Località Sa Terra Mala, 08100 Nuoro, Italy
C. Colella
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dei Materiali e della Produzione, Università Federico II, Napoli, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two zeolitized tuffs (ZTs), viz. a Neapolitan yellow tuff (NYT) and a clinoptilolite-bearing tuff (ZCL), were tested as pedotechnical materials to improve soil resilience against the impact of treatment by a ‘dirty’ municipal sewage system (DSW). Soils (surface horizon) were a sandy, alkaline Entisol (Typic Xeropsamment), and a sandy-loam, sub-acidic Alfisol (Ultic Palexeralf). Results showed that the presence of ZTs resulted in several favourable effects. Electrical conductivity (EC) decreased and pH was buffered. Ammonium was selectively taken up from the DSW, making the zeolitized tuffs almost saturated by NH4+, by exchanging both beneficial cations, such as K+ and Ca2+, thus improving their potential availability to plants, and undesirable cations such as Na+, thereby hindering the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) increase and concurrent soil salinization-alkalinization. At the same time, NH4+ was stored as a potentially slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. The mobility of Pb, Cu and Zn dropped off to a large extent. NYT produced the best effects, and the Entisol gained the greatest benefit from treatments.

Keywords

pedotechniquesoil resiliencenatural zeoliteszeolite tuffwaste watermunicipal sewage treatmention exchange reactions
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 261 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Busaidi, A., Yamamoto, T., Inoue, M., Egrinya Eneji, A., Mori, Y. & Irshad, M. (2008) Effects of zeolite on soil nutrients and growth of barley following irrigation with saline water. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31, 1159–1173.Google Scholar
Allen, E.R. & Ming, D.W. (1995) Recent progress in the use of natural zeolites in agronomy and horticulture. Pp. 477–490 in: Natural Zeolites ’93: Occurrence, Properties, Use (Ming, D.W. & Mumpton, F.A., editors). International Committee on Natural Zeolites, Brockport, New York.Google Scholar
Barbarick, K.A. & Pirela, H.J. (1984) Agronomic and horticultural uses of zeolites: a review. Pp. 93–103 in: Zeo-Agriculture. Use of Natural Zeolites in Agriculture and Aquaculture (Pond, W.G. & Mumpton, F.A., editors). Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
Beler-Baykal, B., Oldenburg, M. & Sekoulov, I. (1996) The use of ion exchange in ammonia removal under constant and variable loads. Environmental Technology, 28, 717–726.Google Scholar
Beltrán, J.M. (1999) Irrigation with saline water: Benefits and environmental impact. Agricultural Water Management, 40, 183 — 194.Google Scholar
Beqiraj, E., Gjoka, F., Muller, F. & Bailif, P. (2008) Use of zeolitic material from Munella region (Albania) as fertilizer in the sandy soils of Divjaka region (Albania). Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2, 33–47.Google Scholar
Bish, D.L. & Ming, D.W. (2001) Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications. Mineralogical Society of America and the Geochemical Society, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 45, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Boettinger, J.L. & Graham, R.C. (1995) Zeolite occurrence in soils: An updated review. Pp. 23–37 in: Natural Zeolites ’93: Occurrence, Properties, Use (Ming, D.W. & Mumpton, F.A., editors). International Committee on Natural Zeolites, Brockport, New York.Google Scholar
Bonn, H.L., McNeal, B.L. & O'Connor, G.A. (1985) Soil Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Bucci, M., Buondonno, A., Colella, C., Coppola, E., Leone, A.P. & Mammucari, M. (2005) Properties of zeolitized tuff/organic matter aggregates relevant for their use in pedotechnique. I. Chemical and physical-chemical properties. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 155, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buondonno, A., Colella, C., Coppola, E., de’ Gennaro, B. & Langella, A. (2000) Quantitative and kinetics of K and P release from Italian zeolitized tuffs. Pp. 449–458 in: Natural Zeolites for the Third Millennium (Colella, C. & Mumpton, F.A., editors). De Frede Editore, Naples, Italy.Google Scholar
Buondonno, A., Coppola, E., Bucci, M., Battaglia, G., Colella, A., Langella, A. & Colella, C. (2002) Zeolitized tuffs as pedogenic substrate for soil rebuilding. Early evolution of zeolite/organic matter proto-horizons. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 142B, 1751–1758.Google Scholar
Buondonno, A., Coppola, E., de Nicola E., & Colella, C. (2005) Zeolitized tuffs in pedotechnical activities: evidence of soil toxicity abatement against biota through bio-test with sea urchin. Paracentrotus lividus. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 158B, 2057–2064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buondonno, A., Capra, G.F., Coppola, E., De Riso, S., Duras, M.G., Selis, G., Vacca, S. & Colella, C. (2008) Comparative resilience of soil and natural zeolite against adverse features of a municipal sewage. A preliminary investigation. Il Nuovo Cimento, 123B, 1435–1447.Google Scholar
Colella, C. (1996) Ion exchange equilibria in zeolite minerals. Mineralium Deposita, 31, 554–562.Google Scholar
Coppola, E., Battaglia, G., Bucci, M., Ceglie, D., Colella, A., Langella, A. & Buondonno, A. & Colella, C. (2002) Neapolitan yellow tuff for the recovery of soils polluted by potential toxic elements in illegal dumps of Campania Region. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 142B, 1759–1766.Google Scholar
Coppola, E., Battaglia, G., Bucci, M., Ceglie, D., Colella, A., Langella, A., Buondonno, A. & Colella, C. (2003) Remediation of Cd- and Pb-polluted soil by treatment with organo-zeolite conditioner. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czaran, E., Meszaros-Kis, A., Domokos, E. & Papp, J. (1988) Separation of ammonia from wastewater using clinoptilolite as ion exchanger. Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management, 8, 107–113.Google Scholar
Deino, A.L., Orsi, G., Piochi, M. & de Vita, S. (2004) The age of the Neapolitan Yellow Tuff caldera-forming eruption (Campi Flegrei caldera—Italy) assessed by 40Ar/39Ar dating method. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 133, 157–170.Google Scholar
El-Hassanin, A.S., Labib, T.M. & Dobal, A.T. (1993) Potential Pb, Cd, Zn and B contamination of sandy soils after different irrigation periods with sewage effluent. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 66, 239–249.Google Scholar
Emongor, V.E. & Ramolemana, G.M. (2004) Treated sewage effluent (water) potential to be used for horticultural production in Botswana. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 1101–1108.Google Scholar
Farkaš, A., Rožic, M. & Barbaric-Mikocevic, Ž. (2005) Ammonium exchange in leakage waters of waste dumps using natural zeolite from the Krapina region, Croatia. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 117B, 25–33.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G.A., Pepper, I.X. & Kneebone, W.R. (1986) Growth of creeping bentgrass on a new medium for turfgrass growth: Clinoptilolite zeolite-amended sand. Agronomy Journal, 78, 1095–1098.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, A., Fabbri, A. & Molari, G. (2005) Influence of sodicity and salinity on the mechanical properties of two italian soils. Biosystems Engineering, 91, 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwenzi, W. & Munondo, R. (2008) Long-term impacts of pasture irrigation with treated sewage effluent on shallow groundwater quality. Water Science and Technology, 58, 2443–2452.Google Scholar
Gworek, B. (1992) Lead inactivation in soils by zeolites. Plant and Soil, 143, 71–74.Google Scholar
Hsu, S.C., Wang, S.T., & Lin, T.H. (1967) Effect of soil conditioner on Taiwan soils. I. Effects of zeolite on physio-chemical properties of soils. Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Research, 16, 50–57.Google Scholar
Juan, R., Hernandez, S., Andres, J.M. & Ruiz, C. (2009) Ion exchange uptake of ammonium in wastewater from a sewage treatment plant by zeolitic materials from fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161, 781–786.Google Scholar
Kay, B.D. & Angers, D.A. (2000) Soil structure. Pp. 229–275 in: Handbook of Soil Science (Sumner, M.E., editor). CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Keren, R. (1991) Specific effect of magnesium on soil erosion and water infiltration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55, 783–787.Google Scholar
Keren, R. (2000) Salinity. Pp. G3–G25 in: Handbook of Soil Science (Sumner, M.E., editor). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Koon, J.H. & Kaufman, W.J. (1975) Ammonia removal from municipal wastewaters by ion exchange. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 47, 449–465.Google Scholar
Langwaldt, J. (2008) Ammonium removal from water by eight natural zeolites: A comparative study. Separation Science and Technology, 43, 2166–2182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legislative Decree no. 152/2006 (2006) Norme in materia ambientale. Presidenza della Repubblica, Rome.Google Scholar
Levy, G.J., van der Watt, H. & du Plessis, H.M. (1988) Effect of Na/Mg and Na/Ca systems on soil hydraulic conductivity and infiltration rate. Soil Science, 146, 303–310.Google Scholar
Livesley, S.J., Adams, M.A. & Grierson, P.F. (2007) Soil water nitrate and ammonium dynamics under a sewage effluent-irrigated eucalypt plantation. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36, 1883–1894.Google Scholar
Loreto, F., Centritto, M. & Chartzoulakis, K. (2003) Photo synthetic limitations in olive cultivars with different sensitivity to salt stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 26, 595–601.Google Scholar
Maas, E.V. (1993) Salinity and citriculture. Tree Physiology, 12, 195–216.Google Scholar
Mercer, B.W., Ames, L.L., Touhill, C.J., Van Slike, W.J. & Dean, R.B. (1970) Ammonia removal from secondary effluents by selective ion exchange. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 42, R95.Google Scholar
Minato, H. (1968) Characteristics and uses of natural zeolites. Koatsugasu, 5, 536–547.Google Scholar
Ming, D.W. & Boettinger, J.L. (2001) Zeolites in soil environments. Pp. 323–345 in: Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications (Bish, D.L. & Ming, D.W., editors). Mineralogical Society of America and the Geochemical Society, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 45, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
MiPAF-Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestall (2000) Metodi di analisi chimica dei suoli. Ed. Angeli, Franco, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
Moreira, S., Vieira, C.B., Coraucci Filho, B., Stefanutti, R. & Jesus, E.F.O. (2005) Study of the metals absorption in culture corn irrigated with domestic sewage by SR-TXRF. Instrumentation Science & Technology, 33, 73–85.Google Scholar
Mumpton, F.A. (2006) Using zeolites in agriculture: Zeolite product website. Available at http://www.zeolite-products.com (verified August 2010).Google Scholar
Munns, R. (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25, 239–250.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M.X. & Tanner, C.C. (1998) Ammonium removal from wastewaters using natural New Zealand zeolites. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 41, 427–446.Google Scholar
Oster, J.D. & Jayawardane, N.S. (1998) Agricultural management of sodic soils. Pp. 126–147 in: Sodic Soil: Distribution, Management and Environmental Consequences (Sumner, M.E. & Naidu, R., editors). Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Qadir, M. & Schubert, S. (2002) Degradation processes and nutrient constraints in sodic soils. Land Degradation & Development, 13, 275–294.Google Scholar
Reháková, M., Čuvanová, S., Dzivák, M., Rimár, J. & Gavalová, Z. (2004) Agricultural and agrochemical uses of natural zeolite of the clinoptilolite type. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 8, 397–404.Google Scholar
Siebe, C. (1994) Accumulation and availability of heavy metals in soils receiving wastewater in Irrigation District 03, Tula, Hidalgo, Mexico. Revista International de Contamination Ambiental, 10, 15–21.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (2010) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11th edition. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Szabolcs, I. (1992) Salinization of soil and water and its relation to desertification. Desertification Bulletin, 21, 27–32.Google Scholar
Szabolcs, I. (1994) The concept of soil resilience. Pp. 33–39 in: Soil Resilience and Sustainable Land Use (Greenland, D.J. & Szabolcs, I., editors). CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, A. & Dell'Aquila, R. (2005) Effects of irrigation with saline waters, at different concentrations, on soil physical and chemical characteristics. Agricultural Water Management, 77, 308–322.Google Scholar