Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:59:27.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray photoelectron diffraction studies of lepidolite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

S. Evans
Affiliation:
Edward Davies Chemical Laboratories, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 1NE, UK
E. Raftery
Affiliation:
Edward Davies Chemical Laboratories, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 1NE, UK

Abstract

X-ray photoelectron diffraction data for three cleavage surfaces from a crystal of a Norwegian lepidolite containing 2·3% Rb and 3% Mn are reported and interpreted. Rubidium is shown to occupy anhydrous interlayer sites equivalent to those of potassium, and to be distributed uniformly throughout the crystals. Cleavage occurs in Mn-rich regions in which the manganese(II) is located in octahedral sites essentially equivalent to those of lithium. The octahedral Al sites can readily be distinguished from the Li,Mn sites and it is concluded that Al occupies predominantly M(2), cis sites while Li and Mn(II) prefer M(1), trans sites. Photoelectron diffraction data also indicate that 40 ± 5% of the Al is tetrahedrally coordinated, compared with a figure of ∼34% deduced independently from a surface analysis.

Resume

Resume

On décrit et interprète les résultats de diffraction de photo-électrons X pour trois surfaces de clivage d'un cristal d'une l'épidolite norvégienne contenant 2·3% Rb et 3% Mn. On démontre que le rubidium occupe des sites inter-feuillets anhydres équivalents à ceux du potassium et qu'il est distribué uniformément à travers le cristal. Les clivages apparaissent dans les régions riches en Mn où le manganèse (II) se trouve en sites octaédriques, essentiellement équivalents à ceux du lithium. On distingue facilement les sites octaédriques Al de ceux des sites Li, Mn et on conclut que Al occupe essentiellement des sites M(2), cis, alors que Li et Mn(II) préfèrent le site M(1), trans. Les données de diffraction photoélectronique indiquent aussi que 40 ± 5% d'Al sont coordonnés tétraédriquement, résultat que l'on peut comparer aux 34% déduits indépendamment par une analyse de surface.

Kurzreferat

Kurzreferat

Eine Auswertung von Röntgen-Photoelektronen-Beugungsdiagrammen dreier Spaltflächen eines norwegischen Lepidolits (2·3% Rb, 3% Mn) ergab, daß Rb ähnlich dem Kalium wasserfreie zwischenpositionen einnimmt und gleichmäßig im Kristall verteilt ist. Spaltbarkeit tritt in Mn-reichen Bereichen auf, in denen das Mn(II) ähnlich dem Li auf oktaedrischen Plätzen sitzt. Die oktaedrischen Al-Positionen können leicht von den (Li,Mn)-Positionen unterschieden werden, und es wird gefolgert, daß Al hauptsächlich M(2), cis-Positionen, Li und Mn(II) dagegen M(1), trans-Positionen besetzen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen weiterhin, daß 40 ± 5% des Al tetraedrisch koordiniert sind; aus Oberflächenanalysen wird hierfür ein Betrag von etwa 34% abgeleitet.

Resumen

Resumen

Se presentan e interpretan datos de difracción de fotoelectrones-X para tres superficies de exfoliación de un cristal de Lepidolita noruega conteniendo 2·3% de Rb y 3% de Mn. Se demuestra que el rubidio ocupa posiciones interlaminares anhidras equivalentes alas del potasio, y que está distribuido uniformemente en el cristal. La exfoliación tiene lugar en zonas ricas en manganeso, en las cuales el Mn+2 se localiza en las posiciones octaédricas esencialmente equivalentes a las del litio. Las posiciones octaédricas ocupadas por Al se diferencian de las ocupadas por Li, Mn, pudiéndose concluir que el Al ocupa predominantemente las posiciones M(2)cis, mientras que el Li y el Mn+2 prefieren las M(1)trans. Los datos de difracción de fotoelectrones indican asimismo que el 40 ± 5% del aluminio está tetraédricamente coordinado, compradao con el 34% deducido independientemente de un análisis de superficie.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Evans, S., Pritchard, R.G & Thomas, J.M. (1977) Escape depths of X-ray (MgKα)-induced photoelectrons and relative photoionisation cross-sections for the 3p subshell of the elements of the first long period. J. Phys. C. (Sol. St. Phys.) 10, 24832498.Google Scholar
Evans, S.. Pritchard, R.G & Thomas, J.M. (1978) Relative differential subshell photoionisation cross-sections (MgKα) from lithium to uranium. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 14, 341358.Google Scholar
Evans, S. Adams, J.M. & Thomas, J.M. (1979) The surface structure and composition of layered silicate minerals: novel insights from X-ray photoelectron diffraction, K-emission spectroscopy and cognate techniques. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Land. A292, 563591.Google Scholar
Evans, S. Raftery, E. & Thomas, J.M. (1979) Angular variations in core-level XPS peak intensity ratios from single-crystal solids. Surface Science 89, 6475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S. & Raftery, E. (1980a) Quantitative X-ray photoelectron diffraction studies of single-crystal silicates. Sol. St. Commun. 33, 12131215.Google Scholar
Evans, S. & Raftery, E. (1980b) X-ray photoelectron studies of titanium in biotite and phlogopite. Clay Miner. 15, 209218.Google Scholar
Evans, S. & Elliott, D.A. (1982) Interfacing AEl/Kratos electron spectrometers to a microcomputer for data acquisition and processing. Surface Interface Analysis (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S. & Raftery, E. (1982a) X-ray photoelectron diffraction studies of sodium in biotite. J. Chem. Research (S) 170171.Google Scholar
Evans, S. & Raftery, E. (1982b) Determination of the oxidation state of manganese in lepidolite by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Clay Miner. 17, 477481.Google Scholar
Fadley, C.S. (1978) Basic concepts of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Pp. 1156 in: Electron Spectroscopy: Theory, Techniques and Applications, Vol. 2 (Brundle, C. R. and Baker, A. D., editors). Academic Press. London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M., Baird, R.J., Kono, S., Hall, N.F.T. & Fadley, C.S. (1980) Explanation of XPS core-level angular distributions for single-crystal copper by two-beam Kikuchi-band theory. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 21, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heifr, K.S. & Adams, J.A.S. (1964) The geochemistry of the alkali metals. Pp. 253381 in: Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Vol. 5 (Ahrens, L. H., Press, F. & Runcorn, S. K., editors). Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
Koppelman, M.H. (1980) Application of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to the study of mineral surface chemistry. Pp. 205243 in: Advanced Chemical Methods for Soil and Clay Minerals Research (Stucki, J. W. & Banwart, W. L., editors). D. Reidel, Dordrecht, London and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, F. (1976) The crystal structure of a 1M lepidolitc. Tschermaks Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt. 23, 6575.Google Scholar
Sartori, F., Franzini, M. & Merlino, S. (1973) Crystal structure of a 2M2 lepidolitc Acta Cryst. B29, 573578.Google Scholar
Shannon, R.D & Prewitt, C.T (1969) Effective ionic radii in oxides and fluorides. Acta Cryst. B25, 925946.Google Scholar
Shannon, R.D & Prewitt, C.T (1970) Revised values of effective ionic radii. Acta Cryst. B26, 10461048.Google Scholar
Swanson, T.H. & Bailey, S.W. (1981) Redetermination of the lepidolite 2M1 structure. Clays Clay Miner. 29, 8190.Google Scholar
Takeda, H. & Burnham, C.W. (1969) Fluorpolylithionite: a lithium mica with nearly hexagonal (Si2 O5 )= ring. Mineral. J. 6, 102109.Google Scholar
Takeda, H., Haga, N. & Sadanaga, R. (1971) Structural investigation of polymorphic transition between 2M2-, lM-lcpidolite and 2M1 muscovitc. Mineral. J. 6, 203215.Google Scholar