Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:06:04.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray diffraction measurement of the quartz content of clay and silt fractions in soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

M. Hardy*
Affiliation:
INRA, Centre de Recherches d'Orléans, Service d'Etude des Sols et de la Carte Pédologique de France, 45160 Ardon, France

Abstract

An XRD method for measurement of quartz content using ZnO as the internal standard was tested on different particle sizes between 0 and 20 µm. Calibration curves showed a good correlation coefficient for particle-size fractions up to 20 µm; the slope increased for the fractions from 0·7 to 5 µm and was relatively constant for coarser particle sizes. Fine quartz fractions were etched with hydrofluoric acid to remove the surface layer damaged during dry grinding. The use of such etched quartz increased the slopes of the calibration curves for small particle-size fractions and approximated the natural fine quartz fraction much better than the original dry-ground material. The mean of six measurements gave good accuracy provided that the slope of the calibration curve was adjusted for the particular particle-size fraction. This method was used on 0–2 µm, 0–0·2µm and 0·2–2 µm fractions of French silty soils and the results are in agreement with the data from chemical analysis and with the mineralogical interpretation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brindley, G.W. (1980) Quantitative X-ray mineral analysis of clays. Pp. 411438 in: Crystal Structure of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification.(Brindley, G.W. & Brown, G., editors). Mineralogical Society, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G.W. & Udagawa, S. (1959) Sources of error in the X-ray determination of quartz. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 42, 643–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillere, S. & Henin, S. (1982) Mineralogie des argiles. II Classification et nomenclature. INRA. Actualites Scientifiques et Agronomiques, 9, Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.L. & Harris, G.W. (1955) Effect of particle size on the quantitative determination of quartz. Nature, 175, 1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, M., Eimberck, M., Do Dihn, T. & Jamagne, M. (1990) Clay mineralogy of grey degraded soils from the Red River basin (Vietnam) and its influence on their properties. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Soil Sci., Kyoto VII, 2833.Google Scholar
Hofmann, U. & Rothe, A. (1968) Die Veranderung des Quarzes beim trockenen Mahlem. Z. anorg. allg. Chem., 357, 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiely, P. V. & Jackson, M.L. (1965) Quartz, feldspar and mica determination for soils by sodium pyrosulfate fusion. Soil Sci. Soc. Proc., 29, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larray, J., Gaudon, P. & Struillou, R. (1982) Dosage quantitatif des kaolinites et des illites par diffraction des rayons X. Bull. Soc. Fr. Miner. Crist., 105, 509–519.Google Scholar
Legrand, C. & Nicolas, J. (1958) Contribution a Tetude du dosage du quartz dans les argiles a I'aide des rayons X. Bull. Soc. Fr. Ceram., 38, 2941.Google Scholar
Nagelschmidt, G., Gordon, R.L. & Griffin, O.G. (1952) Surface of finely ground silica. Nature, 169, 539–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuilly, M. (1987) Erreurs de mesure. Techniques de I'lngenieur, Paris R280, 121.Google Scholar
Robert, M., Hardy, M. & Elsass, F. (1991) Crystallochemistry and organization of soil clays derived from major sedimentary rocks in France. Clay Miner., 26, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Till, R. & Spears, D. A. (1969) The determination of quartz in sedimentary rocks using an X-ray diffraction method. Clays Clay Miner., 17, 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trostel, L.J. & Wynne, D J. (1940) Determination of quartz (free silica) in refractory clays. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 23, 1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar