Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:04:14.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sorption of As(V) by some oxyhydroxides and clay minerals. Application to its immobilization in two polluted mining soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

A. García- Sanchez ,
E. Alvarez-Ayuso  and
F. Rodriguez-Martin
A. García- Sanchez*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, CSIC, Apdo 257, 37071 Salamanca, Spain
E. Alvarez-Ayuso
Affiliation:
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, CSIC, Apdo 257, 37071 Salamanca, Spain
F. Rodriguez-Martin
Affiliation:
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, CSIC, Apdo 257, 37071 Salamanca, Spain
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Among the arsenic species in the environment, arsenate predominates under oxidizing conditions in soils and waters. The adsorption of As(V) by some natural Fe oxyhydroxides and clay minerals and synthetic Al(OH)3 and FeOOH has been studied. The results show a very high As(V) adsorption capacity on both synthetic Al hydroxide (122 mg/g at pH: 5) and Fe oxyhydroxide (76 mg/g at pH 5). This adsorption capacity is pH dependent and shows maximum values at ∼pH 4. The application of these adsorbents to arsenic immobilization in the remediation process of two polluted mining soils with some differences in their physicochemical characteristics has also been studied. The best results were obtained when synthetic Al(OH)3 and FeOOH were used; these materials decreased the water-extractable fraction of As by 55–79% for one soil and by nearly 100% for the other soil, the latter with higher pH and Eh values.

Keywords

adsorptionarsenicoxyhydroxidesclay mineralsremediationsoils
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 187 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M.A. & Malotky, D.T. (1979) The adsorption of protolyzable anions on hydrous oxides at the isolectric pH. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 72, 413–427.Google Scholar
Antona, J.F., Fallick, A.E. & García-Sánchez, A. (1994) Fluid-inclusion and stable-isotope studies of goldtungsten bearing hydrothermal deposits, Saucelle- Barruecopardo area, Spain. European Journal of Mineralogy, 6, 819–835.Google Scholar
Bowell, R.J. (1994) Sorption of arsenic by iron oxides and oxyhydroxides in soils. Applied Geochemistry, 9, 279–286.Google Scholar
Chapman, H.D. (1965) Cation exchange capacity. Pp. 891–901 in: Methods of Soil Analysis (Black, C.A., Evans, D.D., White, J.L., Ensminger, L.E. & Clark, F.F., editors). Soil Science Society of American, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Dove, P.M. & Rimstidt, J.A. (1985) The solubility and stability of scorodite, FeAsO4.2H2O. American Mineralogist, 70, 838–844.Google Scholar
Fendorf, S., Eick, M.J., Grossl, P. & Sparks, D.L. (1997) Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite. 1. Surface structure. Environmental Science Technology, 31, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R.R. & Griffin, R.A. (1977) Effect of pH on adsorption of arsenic and selenium from landfill leachates by clay minerals. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 41, 53–57.Google Scholar
García-Sanchez, A., Santa Regina, I. & Jiménez, O. (1996) Arsenic environmental impact on miningare as (Salamanca, Spain). Toxicological Environmental Chemistry, 53, 137–141.Google Scholar
Garrels, R.M. & Christ, C.L.C. (1965) Minerals, Solutions and Equilibrium. Harper Row, London.Google Scholar
Giles, C.H., McEwans, T.H., Nakhwa, S.N. & Smith, D. (1960) Studies in adsorption: Part IX. A system of classification of solution adsorption isotherms and its use on diagnosis of adsorption mechanisms and in measurement of specific areas of soils. Journal of the Chemical Society, 786, 3973–3993.Google Scholar
Glaubig, R.A. & Goldberg, S. (1988) Determination of inorganic arsenic (III) and arsenic (III plus V) using automated hydride-generation atomic-absorption spectrometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52, 536–537.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. & Glaubig, R.A. (1988) Anion sorption on a calcareous, montmorillon itic soil-Arsenic. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52, 1297–1300.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J.P. & Jacks, G. (1995) Arsenic geochemistry in forest soil profiles as revealed by solid-phase studies. Applied Geochemistry, 10, 307–315.Google Scholar
Harrison, J.B. & Berkheiser, V.E. (1982) Anion interactions with freshly prepared hydrous iron oxides. Clays and Clay Minerals, 30, 97–102.Google Scholar
Haswell, S.J., O’Neill, P. & Bancroft, K.K.C. (1985) Arsenic speciation in soil-pore waters from mineralized and unmineralized areas of South-West England. Talanta, 32, 69–72.Google Scholar
Hingston, F.J., Posner, A.M. & Quirk, J.P. (1971) Competitive adsorption of negatively charged ligands on oxide surfaces. Discussions of the Faraday Society, 52, 334–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, A.K.M. & Lotse, E.G. (1986) Quantitative mineralogical analysis of some Bangladesh soils with X-ray, ion exchange and selective dissolution techniques. Clay Minerals, 21, 31–42.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. (1960) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice- Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New York.Google Scholar
Jiménez, O.,Rodríguez, N. & García-Sánchez, A. (1996) Determination of total arsenic and selenium in soils and plants by AAS with hydride generation and flow injection analysis compled techniques. Journal of AOAC International, 79, 764–768.Google Scholar
Livesey, N.T. & Huang, P.M. (1981) Adsorption of arsenate by soils and its relation to selected chemical properties and anions. Soil Science, 131, 88–94.Google Scholar
Manning, B.A. & Goldberg, S. (1996) Modeling competitive adsorption of arsenate with phosphate and molybdate on oxide minerals. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60, 121–131.Google Scholar
Manning, B.A. & Goldberg, S. (1997) Arsenic (III) and Arsenic (V) adsorption on three California Soils. Soil Science, 162, 886–895.Google Scholar
McBride, M.B. (1994) Environmental Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pierce, M.L. & Moore, C.B. (1982) Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron oxyhydroxides. Water Research, 16, 1247–1253.Google Scholar
Raven, K.P., Jain, A. & Loeppert, R.H. (1998) Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelop. Environmental Science Technology, 32, 344–349.Google Scholar
Sadiq, M. , Zaida, T.H. & Mian, A.A. (1983) Environmental behaviour of arsenic in soils. Theoretical Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 20, 369–377.Google Scholar
Schultz, L.B. (1965) Quantitative interpretation of mineralogical composition from X-ray and chemical data for the Pierre Shale. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 391–C.Google Scholar
Sims, J.R. & Bingham, F.T. (1968) Retention of boron by layer silicates, sesquioxides, and soil materials: II. Sesquioxides. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 32, 364–369.Google Scholar
Singh, D.B., Prasad, G. & Rupaiwar, D.C. (1996) Adsorption technique for the treatment of As(V) rich effluents. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physical Engineering Aspects, 111, 49–56.Google Scholar
Smith, E., Naidu, R. & Alston, A.M. (1998) Arsenic in the soil environment. Advances in Agronomy, 64, 149–195.Google Scholar
Smith, E., Naidu, R. & Alston, A.M. (1999) Chemistry of arsenic in soils: I. Sorption of arsenate and arsenite by four Australian Soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 1719–1726.Google Scholar
Sun, X. & Doner, H.E. (1996) An investigation of arsenate and arsenite binding structures on goethite by FTIR. Soil Science, 161, 865–872.Google Scholar
Tamaki, S. & Frankenberger, W.T. (1992) Environmental biochemistry of arsenic. Review of Environmental Contamination Toxicology, 124, 79–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Waychunas, G.A., Rea, B.A., Fuller, C.C. & Davis, J.A. (1993) Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite. Part 1. EXAFS. Studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenate. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57, 2251–2269.Google Scholar
Wilkie, J.A. & Hering, J.G. (1996) Adsorption of arsenic onto hydrous ferric oxide. Effects of adsorbate/ adsorbent ratios and co-occurring solutes. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physical Chemical Engineering Aspects, 107, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolson, E.A., Axley, J.H. & Kearny, P.C. (1971) Correlation between available soil arsenic, estimate by six methods, and response of Corn (Zen mays L.). Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 35, 101–105.Google Scholar