Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:33:52.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MAS NMR investigation of kaolinite-smectite structure using 6Li and 29Si with Mn exchange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

J. Cuadros*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
T. Wing-Dudek
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
*

Abstract

Kaolinite-smectite mixed-layers have been found to have a complex structure with smectite and kaolinite domains within layers. Here we further investigate this structure in samples with 0–80% kaolinite layers, as determined by X-ray diffraction, by means of magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) of 29Si and 6Li. The 29Si NMR experiments were carried out on two samples (55 and 80% kaolinite layers), before and after their exchange with Mn2+, a paramagnetic ion that causes NMR signal loss from neighbouring nuclei, in order to investigate the distance between Mn ions and Si atoms in kaolinite sites. The 29Si NMR intensity from such sites (at ~–91 ppm) was reduced upon Mn exchange, indicating that some Mn ions are located near kaolinite Si sites. The position of the 6Li peak changes slightly (–1.3 to –1.8 ppm) but progressively with increasing kaolinite content (0–80% kaolinite layers) of four K-S specimens, suggesting two slightly different chemical environments for interlayer Li, one related to smectite and the other to kaolinite. The two sets of experiments are consistent with a complex structure of kaolinite-smectite, including smectite and kaolinite domains within layers and/or interlayers of varying smectitic and kaolinitic character.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present address: Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Senacka 1, Cracow, Poland

References

Altaner, S.P., Weiss, C.A. Jr. & Kirkpatrick, R.J. (1988) Evidence from 29Si NMR for the structure of mixed layer illite/smectite clay minerals. Nature, 331, 699702.Google Scholar
Cuadros, J., Sainz-Díaz, C.I., Ramírez, R. & Hernández-Laguna, A.(1999) Analysis of Fe segregation in the octahedral sheet of bentonitic illite-smectite by means of FTIR, 27Al MAS NMR, and reverse Monte Carlo simulations. American Journal of Science, 299, 289308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Leo, P. & Cuadros, J. (2003) 113Cd, 1H NMR and FTIR analysis of Cd2+ adsorption on dioctahedral and trioctahedral smectite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 403414.Google Scholar
Dudek, T., Cuadros, J. & Fiore, S. (2006) Interstratified kaolinite-smectite: Nature of the layers and mechanism of smectite kaolinization. American Mineralogist, 91, 159170.Google Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. & Wilson, M.J. (1984) Interlayer and intercalation complexes of clay minerals. Pp. 197248 in: Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification (Brindley, G.W. & Brown, G., editors). Monograph 5, Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Roch, G.E., Smith, M.E. & Drachman, S.R. (1998) Solid state NMR characterization of the thermal transformation of an illite-rich clay. Clays and Clay Minerals, 46, 694704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, P. & Pruett, R. (1996) Fe-ordering in kaolinite: Insights from 29Si and 27Al MAS NMR spectroscopy. American Mineralogist, 81, 2638.Google Scholar
Sherriff, B.L., Grundy, H.D. & Hartman, J.S. (1991) The relationship between 29Si MAS NMR chemical shift and silicate mineral structure. European Journal of Mineralogy, 3, 751768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trillo, J.M., Alba, M.D., Alvero, A. & Castro, M.A. (1993) Reexpansion of collapsed Li-montmorillonite; evidence on the location of Li+ ions. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 24, 18091911.Google Scholar