Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:34:09.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of individual clay minerals on formation damage of reservoir sandstones: a critical review with some new insights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

M. J . Wilson*
Affiliation:
James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, UK
L. Wilson
Affiliation:
Corex(UK) Ltd, Howe Moss Drive, Aberdeen, UK
I . Patey
Affiliation:
Corex(UK) Ltd, Howe Moss Drive, Aberdeen, UK
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The influence of individual clay minerals on formation damage of reservoir sandstones is reviewed, mainly through the mechanism of fine particle dispersion and migration leading to the accumulation and blockage of pore throats and significant reduction of permeability. The minerals discussed belong to the smectite, kaolinite, illite and chlorite groups respectively. These minerals usually occur in an aggregate form in reservoir sandstones and the physicochemical properties of these aggregates are reviewed in order to reach a better understanding of the factors that lead to their dispersion in aqueous pore fluids. Particularly significant properties include the surface charge on both basal and edge faces of the clay minerals and how this varies with pH, external surface area of both swelling and non-swelling clays, porosity and pore size distribution in the micro- and meso-pore size range and overall aggregate morphology. For non-swelling clays, and perhaps even for swelling clays, dispersion is thought to be initiated at the micro- or meso-pore level, where the interaction between the pore solution and the charged clay surfaces exposed on adjacent sides of slit- or wedge-shaped pores brings about expansion of the diffuse double electric layer (DDL) and an increase in hydration pressure. Such expansion occurs only in dilute electrolyte solutions in contrast to the effect of concentrated solutions which would shrink the thickness of the DDL and so inhibit dispersion. Stable dispersions are formed, particularly where the solution pH exceeds the isoelectric pH of the mineral, which is often at alkali pH values, so that both basal face and edge surfaces are negatively charged and the particles repel each other. The osmotic swelling of smectitic clays to a gel-like form, so effectively blocking pores in situ, is often invoked as an explanation of formation damage in reservoir sandstones. Such swelling certainly occurs in dilute aqueous solutions under earth surface conditions but it is uncertain that stable smectitic gels could form at the temperatures and pressures associated with deeply buried reservoir sandstones.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2014 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2014

References

Aylmore, L.A.G. & Quirk, J.P. (1967) The micropore size distributions of clay mineral systems. Journal of Soil Science, 18, 1–17.10.1111/j.1365-2389.1967.tb01481.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylmore, L.A.G., Sills, I.D. & Quirk, J.P. (1970) Surface area of homoionic illite and montmorillonite clay minerals as measured by the sorption of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Clays and Clay Minerals, 18, 91–96.Google Scholar
Baker, J.C., Unwins, P.J.R. & Mackinnon, I.D.R. (1993) ESEM study of illite/smectite freshwater sensitivity in sandstone reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 9, 83–94.10.1016/0920-4105(93)90069-QCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J.C., Unwins, P.J.R. & Mackinnon, I.D.R. (1994). Freshwater sensitivity of corrensite and chlorite/ smectite in hydrocarbon reservoirs – an E.E. study. Journal of Petroleum Scence and Engineering, 11, 241–247.Google Scholar
Bauer, A., Velde, B. & Berger, G. (1998) Kaolinite transformation in high molar KOH solutions. Applied Geochemistry, 13, 619–629.Google Scholar
Billault, V., Beaufort, D., Baronnet, A. & Lacharpagne JC. (2003) A nanopetrographic and textural study of grain-coating chlorites in sandstone reservoirs. Clay Minerals, 38, 315–328.10.1180/0009855033830098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, S.R. (1997) The experimental investigation of formation damage due to induced flocculation of clays within a sandstone pore structure by a high salinity brine. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 38156, 123–143.Google Scholar
Brady, P.V., Cygan, R.T. & Nagy, K.L. (1996) Molecular controls on kaolinite surface charge. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 183, 356–364.10.1006/jcis.1996.0557Google Scholar
Buatier, M., Honnerez, J. & Ehret, G. (1989) Fe-smectiteglauconite transition in hydrothermal green clays from the Galapagos spreading centre. Clays and Clay Minerals, 37, 532–541.10.1346/CCMN.1989.0370605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorom, M & Rengasamy, P. (1995) Dispersion and zeta potential of pure clays as related to net particle charge under varying pH, electrolyte concentration and cation type. European Journal of Soil Science, 46, 657–665.10.1111/j.1365-2389.1995.tb01362.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christidis, G.E., Blum, A.E. & Eberl, D.D. (2006) Influence of layer charge and charge distribution on the flow behaviour and swelling of bentonites. Applied Clay Science, 34, 125–138.10.1016/j.clay.2006.05.008Google Scholar
Courbe, C., Velde, B. & Meunier, A. (1981) Weathering of glauconites: reversal of the glauconitization process in a soil profile in western France. Clay Minerals, 16, 231–243.10.1180/claymin.1981.016.3.02Google Scholar
Davis, D.W., Rochow, T.G., Rowe, F.G., Fuller, M.L., Kerr P.F & Hamilton, P.K. (1950) Electron Micrographs of Reference Clay Minerals. Preliminary Report no.6. American Petroleum Institute. Research Project 49.Google Scholar
De Pablo, L., Chávez, M.L. & de Pablo, J.J. (2005) Stability of Na-, K-, and Ca-montmorillonite at high temperatures and pressures: a Monte Carlo simulation. Langmuir, 21, 10874–10884.10.1021/la051334aGoogle Scholar
Diamond, S. (1970) Pore size distribution in clays. Clays and Clay Minerals, 18, 7–23.10.1346/CCMN.1970.0180103Google Scholar
Dogan, A.U., Dogan, M., Onal, M., Sarikaya, Y., Aburub, A. & Webster, D.E. (2006) Baseline studies of the Clay Minerals Society source clays: specific surface area by the Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) method. Clays and Clay Minerals, 54, 62–66.10.1346/CCMN.2006.0540108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, X., Sun, Z., Forsling, W. & Tang, H. (1997) Acid-base properties of aqueous illite surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 187, 221–231.Google ScholarPubMed
Ehrenberg, S.N., Aagard, P., Wilson, M.J., Fraser A.R & Duthie, D.M.L. (1993) Depth-dependent transformation of kaolinite to dickite in sandstones of the Norwegian continental shelf. Clay Minerals, 28, 325–352.10.1180/claymin.1993.028.3.01Google Scholar
Emerson, W.W. & Chi, C.L. (1977) Exchangeable calcium, magnesium and sodium and the dispersion of illites in water. II. Dispersion of illites in water. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 15, 255–262.Google Scholar
Gray, D.H. & Rex, R.W. (1966) Formation damage in sandstones caused by clay dispersion and migration. Clays and Clay Minerals, 15, 355–366.Google Scholar
Gu, X. & Evans, L.J. (2007) Modelling the adsorption of Cd(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) onto Fithian illite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 307, 317–325.10.1016/j.jcis.2006.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, V. & Miller, J.D. (2010) Surface force measurements at the basal planes of ordered kaolinite particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 344, 362–371.10.1016/j.jcis.2010.01.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, V., Hampton, M.A., Stokes, J.R., Nguyen, A.V. & Miller, J.V. (2011) Particle interactions in kaolinite suspensions and corresponding aggregate structures. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 359, 95–103.10.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.043Google Scholar
Hayatdavoudi, A. & Ghalambor, A. (1996) Controlling formation damage caused by kaolinite clay minerals. Part I. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 31118, 473–479.Google Scholar
Hayatdavoudi, A. & Ghalambor, A. (1998) Controlling formation damage caused by kaolinite clay minerals. Part II. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 39464, 421–430.Google Scholar
Hillier, S. (1994) Pore-lining chlorites in siliciclastic reservoir sandstones: electron microprobe, SEM and XRD data and implications for their origin. Clay Minerals, 29, 665–679.10.1180/claymin.1994.029.4.20Google Scholar
Hower, J., Eslinger, E.G., Hower, M.E. & Oerry, E.A. (1976) Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediments. I. Mineralogical and chemical evidence. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 87, 725–737.10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<725:MOBMOA>2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
Humphreys, B., Smith, S.A. & Strong, G.E. (1989) Authigenic chlorite in late Triassic sandstones from the Central Graben, North Sea. Clay Minerals, 24, 427–444.10.1180/claymin.1989.024.2.17Google Scholar
Hurst, A. & Nadeau, P.H. (1995) Clay microporosity in reservoir sandstone: an application of quantitative electron microscopy in petrophysical evaluation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 79, 563–573.Google Scholar
Inoue, A. & Kitagawa, R. (1994) Morphological characteristics of illitic clay minerals from a hydrothermal system. American Mineralogist, 79, 700–711.Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Velde, B., Meunier, A. & Touchard, G. (1988) Mechanism of illite formation during smectite-toillite conversion in a hydrothermal system. American Mineralogist, 73, 1325–1334.Google Scholar
Jeans, C.V. (2006) Clay mineralogy of the Permo- Triassic strata of the British Isles: onshore and offshore. Clay Minerals, 41, 309–354.Google Scholar
Jozefaciuk, G. (2009) Effect of the size of aggregates on pore characteristics of minerals measured by mercury intrusion and water-vapor desorption techniques. Clays and Clay Minerals, 57, 586–601.10.1346/CCMN.2009.0570507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katti, K.S. & Katti, D.R. (2006) Relationship of swelling and swelling pressure on silica-water interactions in montmorillonite. Langmuir, 22, 532–537.10.1021/la051533uCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R.F. (1986) An overview of formation damage and well productivity in oilfield operations. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 38, 131–152.10.2118/10029-PAGoogle Scholar
Lackovic, K., Angove, M.J., Wells, J.D. & Johnson, B.B. (2003) Modelling the adsorption of citric acid onto Muloorina illite and related clay minerals. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 267, 49–59.10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00693-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanson, B. (1997) Decomposition of experimental X-ray diffraction pattern (profile fitting): a convenient way to study clay minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, 45, 132–146.10.1346/CCMN.1997.0450202Google Scholar
Likos, W.J. & Lu, N. (2006) Pore-scale analysis of bulk volume change from crystalline interlayer swelling in Na+– and Ca2+–montmorillonite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 54, 515–528.10.1346/CCMN.2006.0540412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. & Wilson, M.J. (1980) Interlayer and intercalation complexes of clay minerals. Pp. 197–248 in: Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-Ray Identification (G.W. Brindley & G. Brown, editors). Monograph no. 5, Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
McHardy, W.J., Wilson, M.J. & Tait, J.M. (1982) Electron microscope and X-ray diffraction studies of filamentous illitic clay from sandstones of the Magnus Field. Clay Minerals, 17, 23–39.10.1180/claymin.1982.017.1.04Google Scholar
Méring, J. & Oberlin, A. (1971) The smectites. Pp. 231–254 in: The Electron Optical Investigation of Clays (J.A. Gard, editor). Monograph no. 3, Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Mohan, K.K. & Fogler, H.S. (1997) Colloidally induced smectitic fines migration: existence of microquakes. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Institute Journal. 43, 565–576.Google Scholar
Mohan, K.K., Reed, M.G. & Fogler, H.S. (1999) Formation damage in smectitic sandstones by high ionic strength brines. Colloids and Surfaces: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 154, 249–257.Google Scholar
Murray, H.H. & Lyons, S.C. (1959) Further correlations of kaolinite crystallinity with chemical and physical properties. Clays and Clay Minerals, 8, 11–17.10.1346/CCMN.1959.0080104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P.H. (1985) The physical dimensions of fundamental clay particles. Clay Minerals, 20, 499–514.10.1180/claymin.1985.020.4.06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P.H. (1998) An experimental study of the effects of diagenetic clay minerals on reservoir sands. Clays and Clay Minerals, 46, 18–26.10.1346/CCMN.1998.0460103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P.H., Tait, J.M., McHardy, W.J. & Wilson, M.J. (1984a) Interstratified XRD characteristics of physical mixtures of elementary clay particles. Clay Minerals, 19, 67–76.Google Scholar
Nadeau, P.H., Wilson, M.J., McHardy, W.J. & Tait, J.M. (1984b) Interstratified clays as fundamental particles. Science, 225, 923–925.10.1126/science.225.4665.923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P.H., Wilson, M.J., McHardy, W.J. & Tait, J.M. (1985) The conversion of smectite to illite during diagenesis: evidence from some illitic clays from bentonites and sandstones. Mineralogical Magazine, 49, 393–400.10.1180/minmag.1985.049.352.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrish, K. (1954) The swelling of montmorillonite. Discussions of the Faraday Society, 18, 120–134.10.1039/df9541800120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odriozola, G. & Guevara- Rodríguez, F. de, J. (2004) Namontmorillonite hydrates under basin conditions: Hybrid Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics simulations. Langmuir, 20, 2010–2016.10.1021/la035784jGoogle Scholar
Rengasamy, P. (1982) Dispersion of calcium clay. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 20, 153–157.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. (1980) Interstratified clay minerals. Pp. 249–304 in: Crystal Structure of Clay Minerals and their X-Ray Identification (G.W. Brindley & G. Brown, editors). Mineralogical Society Monograph no. 5, London.Google Scholar
Salles, F., Beurroies, I., Bildstein, O., Jullien, M., Raynal, J., Denoyel, R. & Van Damme, H. (2008) A calorimetric study of mesoscopic swelling and hydration sequence in solid Na-montmorillonite. Applied Clay Science, 39, 186–201.10.1016/j.clay.2007.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardini, P., El Albani, A., Pret, D., Gaboreau, S., Siitari- Kauppi, M. & Beaufort, D. (2009) Mapping and quantifying the clay aggregate microporosity in medium- to coarse-grained sandstones using the 14C-PMMA method. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 79, 584–592.10.2110/jsr.2009.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, L.L. & Kwak, J.C.T. (1982) Influence of exchangeable cation composition on the size and shape of montmorillonite particles in dilute suspension. Clays and Clay Minerals, 30, 40–48.10.1346/CCMN.1982.0300105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, L.G. (1969) Lithium and potassium absorption, dehydroxylation temperature, and structural water content of aluminous smectites. Clays and Clay Minerals. 17, 115–149.10.1346/CCMN.1969.0170302Google Scholar
Sherwood, P.T. & Hollis, B.G. (1966) Studies of the Keuper Marl: chemical properties and classification tests. Report of the Road Research Laboratory, 41, 15 pp.Google Scholar
Środoń, J., Eberl, D.D. & Drits, V.A. (2000) Evolution of fundamental particle size during illitization of smectite and implications for reaction mechanism. Clays and Clay Minerals, 48, 446–458.10.1346/CCMN.2000.0480405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suquet, H., de la Calle, C. & Pezerat, H. (1975) Swelling and structural organization of saponite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 23, 1–9.10.1346/CCMN.1975.0230101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suquet, H., Iiyama, J.T., Kodama, H. & Pezerat, H. (1977) Synthesis and swelling properties of saponites with increasing layer charge. Clays and Clay Minerals, 25, 231–242.10.1346/CCMN.1977.0250310Google Scholar
Tchistiakov, A.A. (2000) Colloid chemistry of in situ clay-induced formation damage. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 58747, 1–9.Google Scholar
Tombácz, E., Nyilas, T., Libor, Z. & Csanaki, C. (2004) Surface charge heterogeneity and aggregation of clay lamellae in aqueous suspensions. Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science, 125, 206–215.Google Scholar
Tomkins, R.E. (1981) Scanning electron microscopy of a regular chlorite/smectite (corrensite) from a hydrocarbon reservoir sandstone. Clays and Clay Minerals, 29, 233–235.Google Scholar
Vali, H. & Kö ster, H.M. (1986) Expanding behaviour, structural disorder, regular and random irregular interstratification of 2:1 layer silicates studied by high-resolution images of transmission electron microscopy. Clay Minerals, 21, 827–859.10.1180/claymin.1986.021.5.01Google Scholar
Van Ranst, E. & De Coninck, F. (1983) Evolution of glauconite in imperfectly drained sandy soils of the Belgian Campine. Zeitschrift für Planzenernährung und Bodenkunde, 146, 415–426.Google Scholar
Verhoef, P.N.W. & Snijders, B. (1999) Geschiktheid van glauconiehoudend zand voor wegconstructies. Rapport aan: NV Westerscheldetunnel, Bouwdienst Rijkswaterstaat. TU-Delft rapport, Delft, The Netherlands, 11 pp. Rapportnummer TA/IG/99.023.Google Scholar
Weaver, C.E. (1953) A lath-shaped non-expanded 2:1 clay mineral. American Mineralogist, 38, 279–289.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.J. (2013) Deer, Howie and Zussman, Rock- Forming Minerals. Volume 3C, Clay Minerals, The Geological Society, London, 730 pp.Google Scholar
Yadav, V.P., Sharma, T. & Saxena, V.K. (2000) Dissolution kinetics of potassium from glauconitic sandstone in acid lixiviant. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 60, 15–36.10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00083-6Google Scholar
Zheng, H. (1988) Effects of Exchangeable Cations on Coagulation-Flocculation and Swelling Behavior of Smectites. MSc Thesis. Texas Tech. University, USA.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z., Cameron, S., Kadatz, B. & Gunter, W.D. (1996) Clay swelling diagrams: their applications in formation damage control. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 2, 99–106.Google Scholar