Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:48:09.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dry grinding on pyrophyllite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

J. L. Pérez-Rodríguez ,
L. Madrid Sánchez del Villar  and
P.J. Sánchez-Soto
J. L. Pérez-Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias de Materiales, Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, c/Professor Garcia Gonzalez s/n.Apdo. 1115, 41071-Sevilla
L. Madrid Sánchez del Villar
Affiliation:
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia de Sevilla, CSIC, Avenida Reina Mercedes s/n. Apdo. 1052, 41080-Sevilla, Spain
P.J. Sánchez-Soto
Affiliation:
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia de Sevilla, CSIC, Avenida Reina Mercedes s/n. Apdo. 1052, 41080-Sevilla, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dry grinding of pyrophyllite (Hillsboro, USA) has been studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), specific surface area measurements (BET) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). At the beginning of the grinding process, some effects such as delamination, gliding and folding of the layers, and decrease in particle size were detected by SEM and XRD, resulting in a large increase in specific surface area, up to a maximum of ∼60 m2·g−1. Marked changes in the structure take place between 30 and 32 mins grinding. Longer grinding times increase the degree of disorder and SEM and specific surface area data suggest that aggregation occurs. XRD results indicate that some residual order persists in the degraded structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 399 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Alcover, J.F. & Giese, R.F. (1986) Energie de liaison des feuillets de talc, pyrophyllite, muscovite et phlogopite. Clay Miner. 21, 159–169.Google Scholar
Brindley, G.W. & Wardle, R. (1970) Monoclinic and triclinic forms of pyrophyllite and pyrophyllite anhydride. Am. Miner. 55, 1259–1272.Google Scholar
Brindley, G.W. (1980) Order-disorder in clay minerals structures. Pp. 125–129 in: Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification (Brindley, G.W. & Brown, G., editors). Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Cicel, B. & Kranz, G. (1981) Mechanism of montmorillonite structure degradation by percussive grinding. Clay Miner. 16, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, S.J. (1968) Surface chemistry study of comminuted and compacted solids. Chem. Ind. 11, 611–617.Google Scholar
Grim, R.E. (1968) Clay Mineralogy, pp. 469–471. McGraw-Hill Book Company, N.Y. Google Scholar
Harben, P.W. (1981) Pyrophyllite stands on its own. Pp. 125–129 in: Industrials Minerals Consumer Survey (Coope, B.M. & Dickson, E.M., editors). Metal Bulletin Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Hayashi, H., Koshi, K., Hamada, A. & Sakabe, H. (1962) Structural change of pyrophyllite by grinding and its effect on toxicity of the cell. Clay Sci. 1, 99–108.Google Scholar
Hayashi, T., Inoue, A., Ogihara, M. & Otsuka, N. (1979) Effect of grinding aid of alkyl silicate on dry refining process of clay minerals. Yogyo-Kyokai-Shi 87, 623–632 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Henmi, T. & Yoshinaga, N. (1981) Alteration of imogolite by dry grinding. Clay Miner. 16, 139–149.Google Scholar
Hlavay, J., Jonas, K., Elek, S. & Inczedy, J. (1977) Characterization of the particle size and the crystallinity of certain minerals by infrared spectrophotometry and other instrumental methods. I. Investigations on clay minerals. Clays Clay Miner. 25, 451–456.Google Scholar
Juhasz, Z. (1977) A kristalyhibak jelentosege a mechanokemiai folyamatokban. Kemiai Kozlemenyek 48, 167–187 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Juhasz, Z. (1980) Mechano-chemical activation of kaolin minerals. Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica, 121–145, Supplementum Proc. 10th Kaolin Sym. Budapest.Google Scholar
Juhasz, Z. (1982) Mechanochemical reaction of carbonate minerals. Acta geol Acad. Sci. Hung. 25, 247–270.Google Scholar
Juhasz, Z. & Somogyi, A. (1984) Mahlversuche mit Illit. Keram. Z. 36, 659–662.Google Scholar
Kuwahara, Y. (1971) Experimental study of selection function and distribution function. J. Chem. Eng. Jap. 4, 359–363.Google Scholar
Levine, A.K. & Joffe, J.S. (1947) Fixation of potassium in relation to exchange capacity of soils: V. Mechanism of fixation. Soil Sci. 63, 407–416.Google Scholar
Maqueda, C., Perez-Rodriguez, J.L. & Justo, A. (1986) Problems in the dissolution of silicates by acid mixtures. Analyst 111, 1107–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maqueda, C., Perez-Rodriguez, J.L. & Justo, A. (1987) Effect of pyrophyllite on the precipitation of aluminium sulphate during the dissolution of aluminosilicates by acid mixtures. Analyst 112, 1085–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelovici, E., Nadiv, S. & Lin, I.J. (1984) Morphological and magnetic changes during mechano-chemical transformation of lepidocrocite to hematite. J. Mater. Sci. 19, 1556–1562.Google Scholar
Miller, J.G. & Oulton, T.D. (1970) Prototropy in kaolinite during percussive grinding. Clays Clay Miner. 18, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemecz, E. (1984) Pyrophyllite 1 Tc occurrence at Pazmand (Hungary) in fluorine-activized environment. Acta Geol Hung. 27, 191–202.Google Scholar
Niskanen, E. (1964) Reduction of orientation effects in the quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of kaolin minerals. Am. Miner. 49, 705–714.Google Scholar
Okuda, S., Inoue, K. & Williamson, W.O. (1969) Negative surface charges of pyrophyllite and talc. Proc. Clay Conf. Tokyo 31–41.Google Scholar
Papirer, E. & Roland, P. (1981) Grinding of chtysotile in hydrocarbons, alcohol, and water. Clays Clay Miner. 29, 161–170.Google Scholar
Pérez-Rodríguez, J., Maqueda, C. & Justo, A. (1985) Pyrophyllite determination in mineral mixtures. Clays Clay Miner. 33, 563-566.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, P.E. (1974) Pyrophyllite solid solutions in the system Al2O3-SiO2-H2O. Am. Miner. 59, 254–260.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, P.E. & Cliff, G. (1980) The formation of pyrophyllite solid solutions. Am. Miner. 65,1217-1219.Google Scholar
Rumpf, H. & Schubert, H. (1978) Adhesion forces in agglomeration processes. Pp. 357–376 in: Ceramic Processing before Firing (Onoda, G. & Hench, L., editors). J. Wiley & Sons, N.Y. Google Scholar
Somasundaran, M. (1978) Theories of grinding. Pp. 105–124 in: Ceramic Processing before Firing (Onoda, G. & Hench, L., editors). J. Wiley & Sons, N.Y. Google Scholar
Stanczyk, M.H. & Feld, I.L. (1980) Comminution by the attrition grinding process. Bur. Mines Bull. 670, U.S. Gov. Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sykes, M.L. & Moody, J.B. (1978) Pyrophyllite and metamorphism in the Carolina slate belt. Am. Miner. 63, 96–108.Google Scholar
Weiss, Z. & Durovic, S. (1984) Polytypism of pyrophyllite and talc. II. Classification and X-ray identification of MDO polytypes. Silikaty 4, 289–309.Google Scholar
Zen, E. (1961) Mineralogy and petrology of the system Al2O3-SiO2-H2O in some pyrophyllite deposits of North Carolina. Am. Miner. 46, 52–66.Google Scholar