Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:49:18.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagenetic evolution of crystallite thickness distribution of illitic material in Carpathian shales, studied by the Bertaut-Warren-Averbach XRD method (MudMaster computer program)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

M. Kotarba*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences PAN, Senacka 1, 31-002 Kraków, Poland
J. Środoń
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences PAN, Senacka 1, 31-002 Kraków, Poland
*

Abstract

The MudMaster computer program, based on the modified Bertaut-Warren- Averbach (BWA) XRD method, was used in the study of diagenetic evolution of illitic material in shales. The illitic material was characterized by XRD as a mixture of illite-smectite (I-S) and discrete illite. The experimental conditions for complete dehydration of swelling clays, necessary in this method, were established for a climate of high relative humidity (RH >40%). It was found that the distribution of crystallite thickness of dehydrated illitic material of shales is described by the lognormal law, as was established earlier by the BWA method for pure I-S from pyroclastic rocks. The parameters characterizing this distribution evolve with depth: the mean crystallite thickness (Te), the distribution broadening (DW) and the parameter of a lognormal distribution (β2) increase, whereas the percentage of the most frequent crystallite thickness decreases. The observed scatter of values is not random but indicates fluctuations in the characteristics of the illitic material of shales. The results imply that the modified Scherrer technique of measuring mean crystal thickness from the broadening of XRD reflections can be extended at least to some shales.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drits, V., Środoń, J. & Eberl, D.D. (1997) XRD measurement of mean crystallite thickness of illite and illite-smectite: reappraisal of the Kübler index and the Scherrer equation. Clays Clay Miner. 45, 461–475.Google Scholar
Drits, V., Eberl, D.D. & Środoń, J. (1998) XKD measurement of mean thickness, thickness distribution and strain for illite and illite-smectite crystallites by the Bertaut-Warren-Averbach technique. Clays Clay Miner. 46, 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberl, D.D., Drits, V., Środoń, J. & Niiesch, R. (1996) MudMaster: a program for calculating crystallite size distributions and strain from the shapes of X-ray diffraction peaks. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 96-171, 45p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberl, D.D., Nüesch, R., Šucha, V. & Tsipursky, S. (1998) Measurement of fundamental illite particle thicknesses by X-ray diffraction using PVP-10 intercalation. Clays Clay Miner. 46, 89–97.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.X. (1975) Soil Chemical Analysis–Advanced Course, 2nd edition. Dept. of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Karnkowski, P. (1991) Problems of deep-seated folds in the Carpathians. Prz. Geol. 9, 377–382 (in Polish).Google Scholar
Kisch, H.J. (1987) Correlation between indicators of very low-grade metamorphism. Pp. 227–300 in: Low Temperature Metamorphism (Frey, M., editor). Blackie, New York.Google Scholar
Kübler, B. (1964) Les argiles, indicateurs de métamorphisme. Rev. Inst. Franç. Pétrol. 19, 1093–1112.Google Scholar
Nadeau, P.H., Wilson, M.J., McHardy WJ. & Tait, J.M. (1984) Interparticle diffraction: a new concept for interstratified clays. Clay Miner. 19, 757–769.Google Scholar
Perry, E. & Hower, J. (1970) Burial diagenesis in Gulf Coast pelitic sediments. Clays Clay Miner. 18, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. Jr. (1985) NEWMOD®: a Computer Program for the Calculation of the One-Dimensional Patterns of Mixed-Layered Clays. Reynolds, R.C. Jr., 8 Brook Dr., Hanover, New Hampsire, 03755, USA.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. Jr. & Hower, J. (1970) The nature of interlayering in mixed-layer illite-montmorillonites. Clays Clay Miner. 18, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoch, L., Bahranowski, K., Gatarz, Z. & Środoń, J. (1977) Mineralogical characteristics of clays forming a blanket of sulphur deposit from Machów near Tarnobrzeg. Kwart. Geol. 2, 291–309 (in Polish).Google Scholar
Środoń, J. (1981) X-ray identification of randomly interstratified illite-smectite in mixtures with discrete illite. Clay Miner. 16, 297–304.Google Scholar
Środoń, J. (1984) X-ray powder diffraction identification of illitic materials. Clays Clay Miner. 32, 337–349.Google Scholar
Środoń, J., Elsass, F., McHardy, W.J. & Morgan, D.J. (1992) Chemistry of illite-smectite inferred from TEM measurements of fundamental particles. Clay Miner. 27, 137–158.Google Scholar
Weaver, C.E. (1960) Possible uses of clay minerals in search for oil. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 44, 1505–1518.Google Scholar
Weaver, C.E. (1989) Diagenesis–Metamorphism. Pp. 417-524 in: Clays, Muds, and Shales (Weaver, C.E., editor). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Weber, K. (1972) Notes on the determination of illite crystallinity. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Mh. 1972, 267–276.Google Scholar
Żytko, K. (1989) Profile of borehole Kuzmina 1 (the eastern part of the Polish Carpathians). Kwart. Geol. 33, 360-362 (in Polish).Google Scholar