Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:26:06.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Co-remediation of Ni-contaminated soil by halloysite and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Maja Radziemska ,
Zbigniew Mazur ,
Joanna Fronczyk  and
Jakub Matusik
Maja Radziemska*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, 159 Nowoursynowska Av., Warsaw 02-773, Poland
Zbigniew Mazur
Affiliation:
Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Pl. Łódzki 4, Olsztyn 10-727, Poland
Joanna Fronczyk
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, 159 Nowoursynowska Av., Warsaw 02-773, Poland
Jakub Matusik
Affiliation:
Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology in Kraków, 30 Mickiewicza Av., Kraków 30-059, Poland
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of increasing nickel contamination of soil on the update of selected microelements by Brassica juncea L. in the presence of raw halloysite (RH) and halloysite modified by thermal treatment (calcination) at 650°C (MH) were investigated experimentally. Such treatment causes partial dehydroxylation and enhances mineral-adsorption properties towards cations. In a vegetative-pot experiment, four different levels of Ni contamination, i.e. 0 (control), 80, 160, 240 and 320 mg kg−1 were applied in the form of an analytical-grade NiSO4·7H2O solution mixed thoroughly with the soil. Among the minerals which were added to soil to alleviate the negative impact of Ni on plant biomass, MH had a particularly beneficial effect on the growth of B. juncea L. The amount of Ni, Zn, Cu, Mn, Pb and Cr in Indian mustard depended on the Ni dose and type of accompanying mineral structure. The average accumulation of trace elements in B. juncea L. grown in Ni-contaminated soil follow the decreasing order Mn > Zn > Cu > Ni > Pb > Cr.

Keywords

halloysiteIndian mustardNi-contaminationremediationstabilization
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , June 2016 , pp. 489 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, B., Hayata, S., Fariduddina, Q. & Ahmad, A. (2008) 24-Epibrassinolide protects against the stress generated by salinity and nicke. in Brassica juncea. Chemosphere, 72, 1387–1392.Google Scholar
Ali, H., Khan, E. & Sajad, M.A. (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals - concepts and applications. Chemosphere, 91, 869–881.Google Scholar
Alloway, B.J. (1990) Heavy Metals in Soils. Pp. 83–99. Blackie and Sons, Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
Berthier, P. (1826) Analyse de l'halloysite. Annates de Chimie et de Physique, 32, 332–335.Google Scholar
Bharagava, R.N., Chandra, R. & Rai, V. (2008) Phytoextraction of trace elements and physiological changes in Indian mustard plants (Brassica nigra L.) grown in post methanated distillery effluent (PMDE) irrigated soil. Bioresource Technology, 99, 8316–8324.Google Scholar
Brown, P.H., Welch, R.M. & Cary, E.E. (1987) Nickel: a micronutrient essential for higher plants. Plant Physiology, 85, 801–803.10.1104/pp.85.3.801Google Scholar
Chen, Q. & Wong, J.W.C. (2006) Growth of Agropyron elongatum in a simulated nickel contaminated soil with lime stabilization. Science of the Total Environment, 366, 448–455.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M., Ma, L.Q., Singh, S.P., Cao, X.R. & Melamed, R. (2003) Field demonstration of in situ immobilization of soil Pb using P amendments. Advances in Environmental Research, 8, 93–102.Google Scholar
Chlopecka, A. & Adriano, D.C. (1996) Influence of zeolite, apatite and Fe-oxide on Cd and Pb uptake by crops. Science of the Total Environment, 207, 195–206.10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00268-4Google Scholar
Churchman, G.J., Whitton, J.S., Claridge, G.G.C. & Theng, B.K.G. (1984) Intercalation method using formamide for differentiating halloysite from kaolinite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 32, 241–248.Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, P., Pawluśkiewicz, B., Kalaji, H.M. & Baczewska, A.H. (2013) The effect of light availability on leaf area index, biomass production and plant species composition of park grasslands in Warsaw. Plant, Soil and Environment, 59, 543–548.Google Scholar
Duatre, B., Delgado, M. & Caador, I. (2007) The role of citric acid in cadmium and nickel uptake and transloca-tion, i. Halimione portulacoides. Chemosphere, 69, 836–840.Google Scholar
Epstein, A.L., Gussman, C.D., Blaylock, M.I., Yermiyahu, U., Huang, J.W., Kapulnik, Y. & Orser, C.S. (1999) EDTA and Pb-EDTA accumulation in Brassica juncea grown in Pb-amended soil. Plant and Soil, 208, 87–94.10.1023/A:1004539027990Google Scholar
Feng, N., Dagan, R. & Bitton, G. (2007) Toxicological approach for assessing the heavy metal binding capacity of soils. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 16, 451–158.Google Scholar
Friesl, W., Lombi, E., Horak, O. & Wenzel, W.W. (2003) Immobilization of heavy metals in soils using inorganic amendments in a greenhouse study. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 166, 191–196.10.1002/jpln.200390028Google Scholar
Gajewska, E., Sklodowska, M., Słaba, M. & Mazur, J. (2006) Effect of nickel on antioxidative enzyme activities, proline and chlorophyll contents in wheat shoots. Plant Biology, 50, 653–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeblen, W., Adriano, D.C., Van der Lelie, D., Mench, M., Carleer, R., Clijsters, H. & Vangronsveld, J. (2003) Selected bioavailability assays to test the efficacy of amendment-induced immobilization of lead in soil. Plant and Soil, 249, 217–228.Google Scholar
Guo, Y.L., Schulz, R. & Marschner, H. (1995) Uptake, distribution and binding of cadmium and nickel in different plant species. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 18, 2691–2706.10.1080/01904169509365094Google Scholar
Gupta, S.P., Gupta, V.K. & Kala, R. (1996) A note on effect of nickel application on rabi cereals. New Botanist, 23, 237–239.Google Scholar
He, E. & Van Gestel, C.A.M. (2015) Delineating the dynamic uptake and toxicity of Ni and Co mixtures in Enchytraeus crypticus using a WHAM-FTOX approach. Chemosphere, 139, 216–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeong, S., Moon, H.S. & Nam, K. (2015) Increased ecological risk due to the hyperaccumulation of As in Pteris cretica during the phytoremediation of an As-contaminated site. Chemosphere, 122, 1–7.Google Scholar
Jiang, C.Y., Sheng, X.F., Qian, M. & Wang, Q.Y. (2008) Isolation and characterization of a heavy metal-resistant Burkholderia sp. from heavy metal-contaminated paddy field soil and its potential in promoting plant growth and heavy metal accumulation in metal-polluted soil. Chemosphere, 72, 157–164.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.006Google Scholar
Kabata-Pendias, A. & Pendias, H. (2011) Trace Elements in Soil and Plants, 4th edition. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 365 pp.Google Scholar
Karimi, R., Solhi, S., Salehi, M., Solhi, M. & Mollahosaini, H. (2013) Effects of Cd, Pb and Ni on growth and macronutrient contents of Viciafaba L. and Brassica arvensis L. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4, 739–744.Google Scholar
Liang, X., Han, J., Xu, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, L. & Tan, X. (2014) In situ field-scale remediation of Cd polluted paddy soil using sepiolite and palygorskite. Geoderma, 235–236, 9-18.Google Scholar
Matusik, J., Gaweł, A., Bielanska, E., Osuch, W. & Bahranowski, K. (2009) The effect of structural order on nanotubes derived from kaolin-group minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, 57, 452–164.Google Scholar
McBride, M.B. (1994) Environmental Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 406 pp.Google Scholar
Mishra, S., Singh, V., Scivastava, S., Scivastava, R., Scivastava, M.M., Dass, S., Satsangi, G.P. & Prakash, S. (1995) Studies on uptake of trivalent and hexavalent chromium by maiz. (Zea mays). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 33, 393–397.10.1016/0278-6915(95)00004-LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mocek, A. & Drzymała, S. (2010) Genesis, Analysis and Soil Classification. Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poland (in Polish).Google Scholar
Molas, J. (2002) Changes of chloroplast ultrastructure and total chlorophyll concentration in cabbage leaves caused by excess of organic Ni(II) complexes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 47, 115–126.Google Scholar
Moreno, J.L., Garcia, C. & Hernandez, T. (2003) Toxic effect of cadmium and nickel on soil enzymes and the influence of adding sewage sludge. European Journal of Soil Science, 54, 377–386.Google Scholar
Narwal, R.P., Singh, M., Gupta, A.P. & Khusad, M.S. (1994) Nickel and Zn interaction in corn grown on sewer irrigated soil. Crop Research, 7, 366–372.Google Scholar
Nayek, S., Gupta, S. & Saha, R.N. (2010) Metal accumulation and its effects in relation to biochemical response of vegetables irrigated with metal contaminated water and wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178, 588–595.Google Scholar
Novo, L.A.B. & González, L. (2013) The effects of variable soil moisture on the phytoextraction of Cd and Zn b. Brassica juncea. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 22, 299–304.Google Scholar
Patel, P.M., Wallace, A. & Mueller, R.T. (1976) Some effect of Cu, Co, Cd, Zn, Ni, Cr on growth and mineral element concentration in chrysanthemum. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 101, 553–556.Google Scholar
Patra, M., Bhowmik, N., Bandopadhyay, B. & Sharma, A. (2004) Comparison of mercury, lead and arsenic with respect to genotoxic effects on plant systems and the development of genetic tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 52, 199–223.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.009Google Scholar
Putwattana, N., Kruatrachue, M., Kumsopac, A. & Pokethitiyook, P. (2015) Evaluation of organic and inorganic amendments on maize growth and uptake of Cd and Zn from contaminated paddy soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 17, 165–174.10.1080/15226514.2013.876962Google Scholar
Radziemska, M., Mazur, Z. & Jeznach, J. (2013) Influence of applying halloysite and zeolite to soil contaminated with nickel on the content of selected elements in Maize (Zea mays L.). Chemical Engineering Transactions, 32, 301–306.Google Scholar
Radziemska, M., Mazur, Z., Fronczyk, J. & Jeznach, J. (2014) Effect of zeolite and halloysite on accumulation of trace elements in maize (Zea mays L.) in nickel contaminated soil. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 23, 3140–3146.Google Scholar
Rao, M.K.V. & Sresty, T.V.S. (2000) Antioxidative parameters in the seedlings of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh) in response to Zn and Ni stresses. Plant Science, 157, 113–128.Google Scholar
Sarkar, B., Naidu, R., Rahman, M.M., Megharaj, M. & Xi, Y. (2012) Organoclays reduce arsenic bioavailability and bioaccessibility in contaminated soils. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 12, 704–712.Google Scholar
Schöne, F., Jahreis, G., Richter, G. & Lange, R. (1992) Evaluation of rapeseed meals: effects of iodine supply and glucosinolate degradation by myrosinase or copper. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 61, 245–252.10.1002/jsfa.2740610218Google Scholar
Singh, A. & Prasad, S.M. (2015) A lucrative technique to reduce Ni toxicity in Raphanus sativus plant by phosphate amendment: special reference to plant metabolism. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 119, 81–89.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y., Li, Y., Xu, Y., Liang, X. & Wang, L. (2014a) In situ stabilization remediation of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) co-contaminated paddy soil using bentonite. Applied Clay Science, 105-106, 200–206.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Wu, Q.T., Lee, C.C.C., Li, B. & Long, X. (2014b) Cadmium sorption characteristics of soil amendments and its relationship with the cadmium uptake by hyperaccu-mulatorandnormalplants in amended soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 16, 496–508.Google Scholar
US-EPA Method 3051. (1994) Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediment, Sludges, Soils and Oils. USA Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Wadhawan, K. (1995) Nickel availability and its uptake by plant as influenced by nitrogen and zinc application. MSc Thesis. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.Google Scholar
Wołejko, E., Pawluśkiewicz, B., Wydro, U., Łoboda, T. & Butarewicz, A. (2014) The effect of sewage sludge on the growth and species composition of the sward and the content of heavy metals in plants and urban soil. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences — SGGW Land Reclamation, 46, 101–114.10.2478/sggw-2014-0009Google Scholar
Wyszkowski, M. & Radziemska, M. (2009) The effect of chromium content in soil on the concentration of some mineral elements in plants. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18, 1039–1045.Google Scholar
Wyszkowski, M. & Radziemska, M. (2010) Effects of chromium (III and VI) on spring barley and mayze biomass yield and content of nitrogen compounds. Journal of Toxicology and Environment Health, Part A, 73, 1274–1282.Google Scholar
Wyszkowski, M. & Radziemska, M. (2013a) Influence of chromium (III) and (VI) on the concentration of mineral elements in oat (Avena sativa L.). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 22, 979–986.Google Scholar
Wyszkowski, M. & Radziemska, M. (2013b) Assessment of tri- and hexavalent chromium phytotoxicity on Oats (Avena sativa L.) biomass and content of nitrogen compounds. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 244, 1619–1632.Google Scholar
Yang, X. (1996) Plant tolerance to nickel nutrients toxicity 2. Nickel effects on influx and transport of mineral nutrients in four plant species. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 19, 265–279.10.1080/01904169609365121Google Scholar
Yang, W., Ding, Z., Zhao, F., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhu, Z. & Yang, X. (2015) Comparison of manganese tolerance and accumulation among 24 Salix clones in a hydroponic experiment: application for phytoremediation. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 149, 1–7.10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.09.007Google Scholar
Ye, X., Kang, S., Wang, H., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, G. & Zhao, H. (2015) Modified natural diatomite and its enhanced immobilization of lead, copper and cadmium in simulated contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 289, 210–218.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.052Google Scholar