Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:54:58.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A collection of aspect ratios of common clay minerals determined from conductometric titrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

C. Weber ,
M. Heuser  and
H. Stanjek
C. Weber*
Affiliation:
Clay and Interface Mineralogy, RWTH Aachen University, Bunsenstrasse 8, 52072 Aachen, Germany
M. Heuser
Affiliation:
Clay and Interface Mineralogy, RWTH Aachen University, Bunsenstrasse 8, 52072 Aachen, Germany
H. Stanjek
Affiliation:
Clay and Interface Mineralogy, RWTH Aachen University, Bunsenstrasse 8, 52072 Aachen, Germany
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aspect ratios of common clay minerals have been determined from conductometric titrations. The sample set comprises 11 Na-saturated bentonites, 16 smectites with different interlayer cations, three illites/muscovites and two talc dominated specimens. It is shown that the aspect ratios of smectites saturated with divalent cations are lower than those of the same smectite saturated with a monovalent cation. This observation is discussed in terms of the number of smectite layers making up a particle.

Keywords

aspect ratiobentonitessmectiteconductometric titration
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 495 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergmann, J. & Kleeberg, R. (1998) Rietveld analysis of disordered layer silicates. Materials Science Forum, 278–281, 300–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, B. & Spiers, C.J. (2002) Frictional-viscous flow of phyllosilicate-bearing fault rock: Microphysical model and implications for crustal strength profiles. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukhin, S.S. & Derjaguin, B.V. (1974) Electrokinetic phenomena. In: Surface and Colloid Science (E. Matijevic, editor), volume 7, chapter 2. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Genovese, D.B. (2012) Shear rheology of hard-sphere, dispersed, and aggregated suspensions, and fillermatrix composites. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 171-172, 1–16.Google Scholar
Lu, C. & Mai, Y.-W. (2005) Influence of aspect ratio on barrier properties of polymer-clay nanocomposites. Physical Review Letters, 95, 1–4.Google Scholar
Murray, H.H. (2007) Applied clay mineralogy. Occurrences, processing and application of kaolins, bentonites, palygorskite-sepiolite, and common clays. In: Developments in Clay Science. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Norrish, K. (1954) The swelling of montmorillonite. Discussions of the Faraday Society, 18, 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmusson, M., Rowlands, W.N., O’Brien, R.W. & Hunter, R. (1997) The dynamic mobiliy and dielectric response of sodium bentonite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 189, 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, L.L. & Kwak, J.C.T. (1982) Influence of exchangeable cation composition on the size and shape of montmorillonite particles in dilute suspension. Clays and Clay Minerals, 30, 40–48.Google Scholar
Tournassat, C., Neaman, A., Villiéras, F. Bosbach, D. & Charlet, L. (2003) Nanomorphology of montmorillonite particles: Estimation of the clay edge sorption site density by low-pressure gas adsorption and AFM observations. American Mineralogist, 88, 1989–1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimoto, Y., Chassagne, C. & Adachi, Y. (2013) Dielectric and electrophoretic response of montmorillonite particles as a function of ionic strength. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 404, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ufer, K., Stanjek, H., Roth, G., Dohrmann, R., Kleeberg, R. & Kaufhold, S. (2008) Quantitative phase analysis of bentonites by the rietveld method. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 272–282.Google Scholar
Weber, C., Heuser, M., Mertens, G. & Stanjek, H. (2014) Determination of clay-mineral aspect ratios from conductometric titrations. Clay Minerals, 49, 17–26.Google Scholar