Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:38:00.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clay minerals, δ13C values, pollen and non-pollen palynomorphs as palaeoenviromental and palaeoclimatic indicators in Pliocene sediments of central Anatolia, Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ş. Ali Sayin ,
Nurdan Yavuz  and
Serap Içöz
Ş. Ali Sayin*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Engineering, University of Aksaray, Aksaray, Turkey
Nurdan Yavuz
Affiliation:
General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey
Serap Içöz
Affiliation:
General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Çankırı Basin is one of the largest Cenozoic basins in Central Anatolia, Turkey and contains possible economic hydrocarbon and evaporite reserves. Gypsum is the dominant mineral in the evaporite-bearing Pliocene deposits of the Çankırı Basin. In claystones, the abundance of smectite, dolomite, illite/mica and chlorite in association with minor amounts of mixed-layer chlorite-smectite, mica-vermiculite, amphibole, serpentine, quartz and feldspar together indicate an alkaline environment. Minor kaolinite is also present in some clay samples. Smectite is both detrital and authigenic. Palynological analysis revealed the existence of a mixed forest (Pinus, Cathaya, Tsuga, Cedrus, Abies, Quercus, Ulmus, Juglans, Pterocarya, Acer, Carya, Carpinus, Fagus) dominated by Pinus with a widespread herbaceous understory (Poaceae) interspersed sparsely with open areas occupied by Asteraceae. This flora reflects warm-temperate and humid climatic condition. δ13C analyses have shown that the vegetation was dominated by C3 plants.

Keywords

smectitemixed-layer clayspollenδ13C analysispalaeoclimatepalaeoenvironmentÇankiri Basincentral AnatoliaTurkey
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 351 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is one of a group published in this issue which was originally presented at the Mediterranean Clay Conference, held in Izmir, Turkey in September 2016.

References

Bender, M.M. (1971) Variations in the 13C/12C ratios of plants in relation to the pathway of photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation. Phytochemistry, 10, 1239–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birgili, Ş., Yoldaş, R. & Ünalan, G. (1975) Çankırı-Çorum Havzası’nın jeolojisi ve petrol olanakları. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No.5621, 106 pp.Google Scholar
Brindley, G.W. (1980) Quantitative X-ray analysis of clays. Pp. 441–458 in: Crystal Structure of Clay Minerals and Their X-ray Identification (Brindley, G.W. & Brown, G., editors). Monograph 5, Mineralogical Society, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gündoğan, İ. & Helvacı, C. (2001) Sedimentological and petrographical aspects of Upper Miocene evaporites in the Beypazarı and Çankırı–Çorum Basins, Central Anatolia, Turkey. International Geology Review, 43, 818–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gündoğdu, M.N. (1982) Geological, mineralogical and geochemical investigation of the Bigadiç Neogene Sedimentary Basin. PhD thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
Hemley, J.J. & Jones, W.R. (1964) Chemical aspects of hydrothermal alteration with emphasis on the hydrogene metasomatism. Economic Geology, 59, 538–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karadenizli, L. (2011) Oligocene to Pliocene palaeogeographic evolution of the Çankırı–Çorum Basin, central Anatolia, Turkey. Sedimentary Geology, 237, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karadenizli, L., Saraç, G., Şen, Ş., Seyitoğlu, G., Antoine, P.O., Kazancı, N., Varol, B., Alçiçek, C., Gül, A., Ertan, H. et al. (2004) Çankırı-Çorum Havzasının batı ve güney kesiminin memeli fosillere dayalı Oligo-Miyosen biyostratigrafisi ve dolgulanma evrimi. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Raporu No.107006, 199 pp.Google Scholar
Kaymakç, N. (2000) Tectono-stratigraphical evolution of the Çankırı Basin (Central Anatolia, Turkey). PhD thesis , Geologica Ultraiectina, No. 190. Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 247 pp.Google Scholar
Keller, W.D. (1976) Scan electron micrographs of kaolin collected from diverse origin – III. Influence of parent material on flint clays and flint-like clays. Clays Clay Minerals, 24, 262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, S.J., Ellis, M.A., Mounteney, I. & Kender, S. (2016) Palaeoclimatic implications of high-resolution clay mineral assemblages preceding and across the onset of the Palaeocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, North Sea Basin. Clay Minerals, 51, 793–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukovsky, E.G. (1969) Alteration process in clay minerals. Clay Minerals, 8, 234–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D.M. & Reynolds, R.C. Jr (1989) X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals . Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Okay, A. & Tüysüz, O. (1999) Tethyan sutures of northern Turkey. Pp. 475–515 in: The Mediterranean Basins: Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen (Durand, B., Jolivet, L., Horváth, F. & Séranne, M., editors). Special Publication 156, Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Sayın, S.A. (1984) The geology, mineralogy, geochemistry and orgin of the Yeniçağa Kaolinite Deposits and other similar deposits in Western Turkey. PhD thesis , University of London, London, UK.Google Scholar
Sayın, S.A. (2007) Origin of kaolin deposits: evidence from the Hisarcık (Emet-Kütahya) kaolin deposits, western Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Science, 16, 77–96.Google Scholar
Sayın, S.A. (2015) Quartz-mica schist and gneiss hosted clay deposits within the Yenipazar (Yozgat, Central Anatolia) volcanogenic massive sulphide ore. Turkish Journal of Earth Science, 24, 1–21.Google Scholar
Steininger, R. (1999) Chronostratigraphy, geochronology and biochronology of the Miocene “European Land Mammal Mega-Zones (ELMNZ)” and the Miocene “Mammal Zones (MN-Zones)”. Pp. 9–24 in: The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe (Rössner, G.E. & Heissing, K., editors). Verlag Dr. Freidrich Pfeil, Munich, Germany, 515 pp.Google Scholar
Tüysüz, O. & Dellaloğlu, A.A. (1994) Palaeogeographic evolution of the Çankırı Basin and surroundings, Cental Anatolia, Türkiye 10. Petrol Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, pp. 56–76.Google Scholar
Varol, B., Araz, H., Karadenizli, L., Kazancı, N., Seyitoğlu, G. & Şen, Ş. (2002) Sedimentology of the Miocene evaporitic succession in the north of Çankırı–Çorum Basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey. Carbonates Evaporites, 12, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wick, L. (2000) Vegetational response to climatic changes recorded in Swiss Late Glacial lake sediments. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 159, 231–250.Google Scholar