Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T01:11:44.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adsorption of pathogenic microorganisms, NH4+ and heavy metals from wastewater by clinoptilolite using bed laminar flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Chiara Ferronato*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, viale Fanin 40, 40127, Bologna, Italy
Gilmo Vianello
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, viale Fanin 40, 40127, Bologna, Italy
Livia Vittori Antisari
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, viale Fanin 40, 40127, Bologna, Italy
*

Abstract

The contamination of water bodies in urban areas is a serious problem, which may increase when wastewater is discharged without complete remediation. Due to their high adsorption capacity and ion-exchange properties, zeolites, such as clinoptilolite, can be used successfully to detoxify the wastewater before discharging it into the water body. In this study, experimental use of clinoptilolite is presented for water remediation. A static flow (A) and a laminar flow (B) method were applied in order to evaluate the efficiency of clinoptilolite for reducing different contaminants in the outflow wastewater of an old municipal treatment plant in Bologna District (Northern Italy). Mesocosm experiments were performed in order to achieve reduction of the microbial faecal indicators and of the excess nutrients and heavy metals in the effluent. During the experiments, pathogenic microorganisms, ammonium and heavy metals were reduced by as much as between 78 and 95% within 24 h, highlighting the great efficiency of this low-cost material for water remediation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abollino, O., Giacomino, A., Malandrino, M. & Mentasti, E. (2006) The efficiency of vermiculite as natural sorbent for heavy metals. Application to a contaminated soil. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 181, 149160.Google Scholar
Ackley, M.W. & Yang, R.T. (1991) Adsorption characteristics of high-exchange clinoptilolites. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 30, 25232530.Google Scholar
Azizian, S. (2004) Kinetic models of sorption: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 276, 4752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beasley, G. & Kneale, P. (2002) Reviewing the impact of metals and PAHs on macroinvertebrates in urban watercourses. Progress in Physical Geography, 26, 236270.Google Scholar
Beasley, G. & Kneale, P.E. (2004) Assessment of heavy metal and PAH contamination of urban streambed sediments on macroinvertebrates. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 4, 563578.Google Scholar
Berber-Mendoza, M.S., Leyva-Ramos, R., Alonso-Davila, P., Fuentes-Rubio, L. & Guerrero-Coronado, R.M. (2006) Comparison of isotherms for the ion exchange of Pb(II) from aqueous solution onto homoionic clinoptilolite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 301, 405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, R.M., Perron, M.M., Cantwell, M.G., Ho, K.T., Serbst, J.R. & Pelletier, M.C. (2004) Use of zeolite for removing ammonia and ammonia-caused toxicity in marine toxicity identification evaluations. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 47, 4407.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Hu, S., Shen, C., Dou, C., Shi, J. & Chen, Y. (2009) Interaction of Pseudomonas putida CZ1 with clays and ability of the composite to immobilize copper and zinc from solution. Bioresource Technology, 100, 330337.Google Scholar
Doula, M., Ioannou, A. & Dimirkou, A. (2002) Copper adsorption and Si, Al, Ca, Mg, and Na release from clinoptilolite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 245, 237250.Google Scholar
Englert, A.H. & Rubio, J. (2005) Characterization and environmental application of a Chilean natural zeolite. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 75, 2129.Google Scholar
Erdem, E., Karapinar, N. & Donat, R. (2004) The removal of heavy metal cations by natural zeolites. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 280, 309314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farkas, A., Rozić, M. & Barbarić-Mikocević, Z. (2005) Ammonium exchange in leakage waters of waste dumps using natural zeolite from the Krapina region, Croatia. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 117, 2533.Google Scholar
Ferronato, C., Modesto, M., Stefanini, I., Vianello, G., Biavati, B. & Antisari, L.V. (2013a) Chemical and microbiological parameters in fresh water and sediments to evaluate the pollution risk in the Reno River watershed (north Italy). Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 5, 458468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferronato, C., Vittori Antisari, L., Modesto, M. & Vianello, G. (2013b) Speciation of heavy metals at water-sediment interface. EQA – Environmental Quality, 10, 5164.Google Scholar
Guo, X., Zeng, L.L., Li, X. & Park, H.-S. (2008) Ammonium and potassium removal for anaerobically digested wastewater using natural clinoptilolite followed by membrane pretreatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151, 125133.Google Scholar
Ho, H.H., Swennen, R., Cappuyns, V., Vassilieva, E., Van Gerven, T. & Tran, T. Van. (2012) Potential release of selected trace elements (As, Cd, Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn) from sediments in Cam River-mouth (Vietnam) under influence of pH and oxidation. The Science of the Total Environment, 435-436, 487498.Google Scholar
Inglezakis, V.J., Loizidou, M.D. & Grigoropoulou, H.P. (2003) Ion exchange of Pb2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, and Cr3+ on natural clinoptilolite: selectivity determination and influence of acidity on metal uptake. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 261, 4954.Google Scholar
Jama, M.A. & Yücel, H. (1989) Equilibrium studies of sodium-ammonium, potassium-ammonium, and calcium- ammonium exchanges on clinoptilolite zeolite. Separation Science and Technology, 24, 13931416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, T.C. & Weatherley, L.R. (2003) Ammonia removal from wastewater by ion exchange in the presence of organic contaminants. Water Research, 37, 17231728.Google Scholar
Karadag, D., Koc, Y., Turan, M. & Armagan, B. (2006) Removal of ammonium ion from aqueous solution using natural Turkish clinoptilolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136, 604609.Google Scholar
Kocaoba, S., Orhan, Y. & Akyüz, T. (2007) Kinetics and equilibrium studies of heavy metal ions removal by use of natural zeolite. Desalination, 214, 110.Google Scholar
Du Laing, G., Rinklebe, J., Vandecasteele, B., Meers, E. & Tack, F.M.G. (2009) Trace metal behaviour in estuarine and riverine floodplain soils and sediments: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 39723985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalczyk, P., Sprynskyy, M., Terzyk, A.P., Lebedynets, M., Namieśnik, J. & Buszewski. B. (2006) Porous structure of natural and modified clinoptilolites. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 297, 7785.Google Scholar
Lameiras, S., Quintelas, C. & Tavares, T. (2008) Biosorption of Cr (VI) using a bacterial biofilm supported on granular activated carbon and on zeolite. Bioresource Technology, 99, 801806.Google Scholar
Li, X., Shen, Z., Wai, O.W. & Li, Y.S. (2001) Chemical forms of Pb, Zn and Cu in the sediment profiles of the Pearl River Estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 215223.Google Scholar
Liu, C.H. & Lo, K.V. (2001) Ammonia removal from composting leachate using zeolite. I. Characterization of the zeolite. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/ Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 36, 16711688.Google Scholar
Malandrino, M., Abollino, O., Giacomino, A., Aceto, M. & Mentasti, E. (2006) Adsorption of heavy metals on vermiculite: influence of pH and organic ligands. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 299, 537546.Google Scholar
Mamba, B.B., Dlamini, N.P., Nyembe, D.W. & Mulaba-Bafubiandi, A.F. (2009) Metal adsorption capabilities of clinoptilolite and selected strains of bacteria from mine water. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 34, 830840.Google Scholar
Nyembe, D.W., Mamba, B.B. & Mulaba Bafubiandi, A.F. (2010) Adsorption mechanisms of Co2+ and Cu2+ from aqueous solutions using natural clinoptilolite: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 599610.Google Scholar
Park, S.J., Sool, H. & Yoon, T.Il. (2002) The evaluation of enhanced nitrification by immobilized biofilm on a clinoptilolite carrier. Bioresource Technology, 82, 183189.Google Scholar
Prigione, V., Varese, G.C., Casieri, L. & Marchisio, V.F. (2008) Biosorption of simulated dyed effluents by inactivated fungal biomasses. Bioresource Technology, 99, 35593567.Google Scholar
Quintelas, C., Pereira, R., Kaplan, E. & Tavares, T. (2013) Removal of Ni(II) from aqueous solutions by an Arthrobacter viscosus biofilm supported on zeolite: from laboratory to pilot scale. Bioresource Technology, 142, 368374.Google Scholar
Rich, G. & Cherry, K. (1987) Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies. Pudvan Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Rosales, E., Pazos, M., Sanromán, M.A. & Tavares, T. (2012) Application of zeolite-Arthrobacter viscosus system for the removal of heavy metal and dye: Chromium and Azure B. Desalination, 284, 150156.Google Scholar
Shaheen, S.M., Derbalah, A.S. & Moghanm, F.S. (2012) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by zeolite in competitive sorption system. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3, 362367.Google Scholar
Silva, B., Figueiredo, H., Quintelas, C., Neves, I.C. & Tavares, T. (2012) Improved biosorption for Cr(VI) reduction and removal by Arthrobacter viscosus using zeolite. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 74, 116123.Google Scholar
Srivastava, V.C., Mall, I.D. & Mishra, I.M. (2009) Competitive adsorption of cadmium(II) and nickel(II) metal ions from aqueous solution onto rice husk ash. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 48, 370379.Google Scholar
Stotzky, G. (1985) Mechanisms of adhesion to clays, with reference to soil systems. Pp. 195–253 in: Bacterial Adhesion (D.C. Savage & M. Fletcher, editors). Springer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
Unuabonah, E.I., Adie, G.U., Onah, L.O. & Adeyemi, O.G. (2009) Multistage optimization of the adsorption of methylene blue dye onto defatted Carica papaya seeds. Chemical Engineering Journal, 155, 567579.Google Scholar
Varol, M. (2011) Assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the Tigris River (Turkey) using pollution indices and multivariate statistical techniques. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 195, 355364.Google Scholar
Vieira dos Santos, A.C. & Masini, J.C. (2007) Evaluating the removal of Cd(II), Pb(II) and Cu(II) from a wastewater sample of a coating industry by adsorption onto vermiculite. Applied Clay Science, 37, 167174.Google Scholar
Vittori Antisari, L., Trivisano, C., Gessa, C., Gherardi, M., Simoni, A., Vianello, G. & Zamboni, N. (2010) Quality of municipal wastewater compared to surface waters of the river and artificial canal network in different areas of the eastern Po valley (Italy). Water Quality, Exposure and Health, 2, 113.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Liu, S., Xu, Z., Han, T., Chuan, S. & Zhu, T. (2006) Ammonia removal from leachate solution using natural Chinese clinoptilolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136, 735740.Google Scholar
Weatherley, L.R. & Miladinovic, N.D. (2004) Comparison of the ion exchange uptake of ammonium ion onto New Zealand clinoptilolite and mordenite. Water Research, 38, 43054312.Google Scholar
Zamzow, M.J. & Murphy, J.E. (1992) Removal of metal cations from water using zeolites. Separation Science and Technology, 27, 19691984.Google Scholar