Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:10:31.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sulphur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking using a kaolin in situ crystallization catalyst modified with vanadium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

Ya-Li Dai ,
Shu-Qin Zheng  and
Dong Qian
Ya-Li Dai
Affiliation:
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang 414000, Hunan, China
Shu-Qin Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang 414000, Hunan, China
Dong Qian*
Affiliation:
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Changsha 410083, PR China
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sulphur reduction catalysts represent a viable option for S reduction in the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process. In this paper, a kaolin in situ crystallization catalyst was modified with vanadium and evaluated in a fixed fluid bed (FFB) reactor. The relation between the acidity of the catalyst, the S reduction rate and the catalyst activity is discussed. The results show that increasing weak Lewis acid acidity favours S reduction in the FCC process. Increasing the V content enhances the weak Lewis acidity, so causing the S reduction rate to increase. The kaolin in situ crystallization catalyst modified with 0.6 wt.% of V leads to a 34.5% reduction in the S content of the liquid product. Comprehensive evaluation of the FFB results and the S reduction ability indicates that the catalyst modified with 0.45 wt.% V provided the best performance.

Keywords

kaolinin situ crystallization catalystvanadium modificationaciditysulphur reductionfluid catalytic cracking (FCC)
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 281 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babich, I.V. & Moulijn, J.A. (2003) Science and technology of novel processes for deep desulfurization of oil refinery streams: a review. Fuel, 82, 607–631.Google Scholar
Can, F., Travert, A., Ruaux, V., Gilson, J.-P., Maugé, F., Hu, R. & Wormsbecher, R.F. (2007) FCC gasoline sulfur reduction additives: Mechanism and active sites. Journal of Catalysis, 249, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chester, A.W., Timken, H.K.C., Ziebarth, M.S. & Roberie, T.G. (1997) Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking. U.S. Patent No. 6,852,214.Google Scholar
Corma, A., Martínez, C., Ketley, G. & Blair, G. (2001) On the mechanism of sulfur removal during catalytic cracking. Applied Catalysis A: General, 208, 135–152.Google Scholar
Gao, X.H., Liu, H.H., Wang, B.J., Duan, C.Y. & Pang, X.M. (2005) Method for the preparation of high-content NaY molecular sieves synthesized from kaolin sprayed microspheres. U.S. Patent No. 7,390,762.Google Scholar
Garacia, C.L. & Lercher, J.A. (1992) Adsoption and surface reaction of thiophene on HZSM-5 zeolite. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 96, 2669–2675.Google Scholar
Gates, B.C., Katzer, J.R. & Schuit, G.C.A. (1979) Chemistry of Catalytic Processes. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, Chapter 5.Google Scholar
Jaimes, L., Tonetto, G.M., Ferreira, M.L. & de Lasa, H. (2008) Desulfurization of FCC gasoline: Novel catalytic processes with zeolites. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 6, Review Rl.Google Scholar
Lappas, A.A., Valla, J.A., Vasalos, I.A., Kuehler, C., Francis, J., O'Connor, P. & Gudde, N.J. (2004) The effect of catalyst properties on the in situ reduction of sulfur in FCC gasoline. Applied Catalysis A: General, 262, 31–41.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B.R. (1980) Metal contamination of cracking catalysts: 1. Synthetic metals deposition on fresh catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development, 19, 209–213.Google Scholar
Nava, R., Ortega, R.A., Alonso, G., Ornelas, C., Pawelec, B. & Fierro, J.L.G. (2007) CoMo/Ti-SBA-15 catalysts for dibenzothiophene desulfurization. Catalysis Today, 127, 70–84.Google Scholar
Newman, A.C.D. & Brown, G. (1987) The Chemical Constitution of Clays. Pp. 22–26 in: The Chemistry of Clays and Clay Minerals (Newman, A.C.D., editor). Monograph No. 6, Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P., Forni, L. & Hodnett, B.K. (2001) The role of acid site strength in the Beckmann Rearrangement. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40, 1471–1475.Google Scholar
Pang, X.M., Zhang, L., Sun, S.H., Liu, T. & Gao, X.H. (2007) Effect of metal modifications of Y zeolites on sulfur reduction performance in fluid catalytic cracking process. Catalysis Today, 125, 173–177.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, M.A.B., Ahmed, S., Aitani, A.M. & Dean, C.F. (2006) Sulfur reduction in FCC gasoline using catalyst additives. Applied Catalysis A: General, 303, 116–120.Google Scholar
Sun, S.H., Zheng, S.Q., Wang, Z.F., Zhang, Y.H. & Ma, J.T. (2005) Sulphur reduction additive prepared from caustic-modified kaolin. Clay Minerals, 40, 311–316.Google Scholar
Takahasi, T., Ueno, K. & Kai, T. (1991) Vapor phase reaction of Cyclohexanone Oxime over Boria modified HZSM-5 zeolites. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 69, 1096–1099.Google Scholar
Valla, J.A., Lappas, A.A., Vasalos, I.A., Kuehler, C.W. & Gudde, N.J. (2004) Feed and process effects on in situ reduction of sulfur in FCC gasoline. Applied Catalysis A: General, 276, 75–87.Google Scholar
Wormsbecher, R.F. & Kim, G. (1996) Sulfur reduction in FCC gasoline. U.S. Patent No. 5,525,210.Google Scholar
Wormsbecher, R.F., Peters, A.W. & Maselli, J.M. (1986) Vanadium poisoning of cracking catalysts: mechanism of poisoning and design of vanadium tolerant catalyst system. Journal of Catalysis, 100, 130–137.Google Scholar
Xu, M.T., Liu, X.S. & Rostam, J.M. (2002) Pathways for Y zeolite destruction: The role of sodium and vanadium. Journal of Catalysis, 207, 237–246.Google Scholar
Yang, H.F., Liang, Y.M. & Liu, Y.F. (2003) The conversion of thiophene and alkyl thiophene on REHY cracking catalyst. Ada Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing section) (China), 19, 1–7.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z.K., Niu, X.L., Liu, S.G., Zhu, X.X., Yu, H.W. & Xu, L.Y. (2008) The performance of HMCM-22 zeolite catalyst on the olefin alkylation thiophenic sulfur in gasoline. Catalysis Communications, 9, 60–64.Google Scholar
Zheng, S.Q., Sun, S.H., Wang, Z.F., Gao, X.H. & Xu, X.L. (2005a) Properties of Guizhou kaolin and suitability as a FCC resid additive. Bulletin of the Catalysis Society of India, 4, 30–36.Google Scholar
Zheng, S.Q., Sun, S.H., Wang, Z.F., Gao, X.H. & Xu, X.L. (2005b) Suzhou kaolin as a FCC catalyst. Clay Minerals, 40, 303–310.Google Scholar
Zheng, S.Q., Ding, W., Zhang, Y.L., Zheng, G.T. & Xu, X.L. (2006) Properties of FCC catalyst additive prepared from Guizhou Kaoline. Chemistry in Industry, 55, 373–379.Google Scholar