Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:55:19.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sepiolite as an efficient adsorbent for ethylene gas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2022

Burcu Erdoğan Open the ORCID record for Burcu Erdoğan [Opens in a new window]  and
Fahri Esenli Open the ORCID record for Fahri Esenli [Opens in a new window]
Burcu Erdoğan*
Affiliation:
Eskisehir Technical University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, 26470, Eskisehir, Turkey
Fahri Esenli
Affiliation:
Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Mines, Geological Engineering Department, Istanbul, Turkey
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability of Na+-, Li+-, K+-, Ca2+- and Mg2+-exchanged sepiolites and acid-activated sepiolites to remove ethylene from storage environments was examined. The sepiolite from Sivrihisar deposit, Turkey, was treated with 1.0 M NaNO3, LiNO3, KNO3, Ca(NO3)2, Mg(NO3)2, HNO3 and H2SO4 solutions at 90°C for 4 h. The mineralogical, chemical and textural properties of the materials were examined using X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, cation-exchange capacity and nitrogen gas adsorption analyses. The main mineral phase present in the materials was sepiolite, with minor dolomite, and traces of quartz and feldspar minerals and amorphous matter. Adsorption isotherms of ethylene at 273 K were measured on sepiolite samples over a pressure range of 0–100 kPa. As a result of partial blockage of the sepiolite channels, the ethylene adsorption capacity on cation-exchanged sepiolite forms (0.376–0.907 mmol g–1) was less than that of acid-activated sepiolite forms (1.279 and 1.308 mmol g–1). The ethylene adsorption capacities of the sepiolite samples were compared with those of other clay-based materials (0.167–1.817 mmol g–1) reported in previous studies of ethylene removal.

Keywords

adsorptionBETethylenesepioliteXRD
Type
Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 222 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Miroslav Pospíšil

References

Alkan, M., Çelikçapa, S., Demirbaş, Ö. & Doğan, M. (2005) Removal of reactive blue 221 and acid blue 62 anionic dyes from aqueous solutions by sepiolite. Dyes and Pigments, 65, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Hernandez, M., Artes-Hernandez, F., Avalos-Belmontes, F., Castillo-Campohermoso, M.A., Contreras-Esquivel, J.C., Ventura-Sobrevilla, J.M. & Martinez-Hernandez, G.B. (2018) Current scenario of adsorbent materials used in ethylene scavenging systems to extend fruit and vegetable postharvest life. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 11, 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigatti, M.F., Galán, E. & Theng, B.K.G. (2006) Structures and mineralogy of clay minerals. Pp. 21–81 in: Handbook of Clay Science (Bergaya, F., Theng, B.K.G. & Lagaly, G., editors). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Brigatti, M.F., Lugli, C. & Poppi, L. (2000) Kinetics of heavy-metal removal and recovery in sepiolite. Applied Clay Science, 16, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H.D. (1965) Cation exchange capacity. Pp. 891–901 in: Methods of Soil Analysis (Black, C.A., editor). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Cho, S.H., Park, J.H., Han, S.S. & Kim, J.N. (2005) Comparison of AgNO3/clay and AgNO3/ALSG sorbent for ethylene separation. Adsorption, 11, 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choundary, N.V., Kumar, P., Bhat, T.S.G., Cho, S.H., Han, S.S. & Kim, J.N. (2002) Adsorption of light hydrocarbon gases on alkene-selective adsorbent. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 41, 2728–2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekany, I., Turi, L., Fonseca, A. & Nagy, J.B. (1999) The structure of acid treated sepiolites: small-angle X-ray scattering and multi MAS-NMR investigations. Applied Clay Science, 14, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ece, Ö.I. & Çoban, F. (1994) Geology, occurrence, and genesis of Eskisehir sepiolites, Turkey. Clays and Clay Minerals, 42, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan Alver, B. (2017) Adsorption studies of hydrogen and ethylene on cation-exchanged bentonite. Clay Minerals, 52, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan Alver, B. & Günal, A. (2016) Thermal, structural and ethylene adsorption properties of Ag-, Cu- and Fe-modified bentonite from Turkey. Journal of Thermal Analysis Calorimetry, 126, 1533–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan Alver, B. & Sakızcı, M. (2012) Ethylene adsorption on acid-treated clay minerals. Adsorption Science & Technology, 30, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan Alver, B., Alver, Ö., Günal, A. & Dikmen, G. (2016) Effects of hydrochloric acid treatment on structure characteristics and C2H4 adsorption capacities of Ünye bentonite from Turkey: a combined FT-IR, XRD, XRF, TG/DTA and MAS NMR study. Adsorption, 22, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteban-Cubillo, A., Pina-Zapardiel, R., Moya, J.S., Barba, M.F. & Pecharroman, C. (2008) The role of magnesium on the stability of crystalline sepiolite structure. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 28, 1763–1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaikwad, K.K., Singh, S. & Negi, Y.S. (2019) Ethylene scavengers for active packaging of fresh food produce. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18, 1–16.Google Scholar
Galán, E. (1996) Properties and applications of palygorskite–sepiolite clays. Clay Minerals, 31, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Pradas, E., Socias-Viciana, M., Urena-Amate, M.D., Cantos-Molina, A. & Villafranca-Sanchez, M. (2005) Adsorption of chloridazon from aqueous solution on heat and acid treated sepiolites. Water Research, 39, 1849–1857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gwak, G.H., Kim, H.J., Oh, J.M., Lee, S.W., Kwon, Y.C. & Han, Y.S. (2017) Ethylene scavenging ability of permanganate incorporated nanoclays. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 17, 3576–3580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, N., Khan, N.A., Ferrante, A., Trivellini, A., Francini, A. & Khan, M.I.R. (2017) Ethylene role in plant growth, development and senescence: interaction with other phytohormones. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, B.F. & Galán, E. (1988) Sepiolite and palygorskite. Pp. 631–674 in: Hydrous Phyllosilicates (Bailey, S.W., editor). Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadir, S., Erkoyun, H., Eren, M., Huggett, J. & Önalgil, N. (2016) Mineralogy, geochemistry, and genesis of sepiolite and palygorskite in Neogene lacustrine sediments, Eskişehir Province, west central Anatolia, Turkey. Clays and Clay Minerals, 64, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakaş, Z. & Varol, B. (1994) Petrography of lacustrine dolomites in Sivrihisar Neogene basin and interpretation of their depositional environment using stable isotopes (d18O; d13C). Mineral Research and Exploration Bulletin of Turkey, 116, 23–38.Google Scholar
Komadel, P. (2003) Chemically modified smectites. Clay Minerals, 38, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komadel, P. & Madejová, J. (2006) Acid activation of clay minerals. Pp. 263–287 in: Handbook of Clay Science (Bergaya, F., Theng, B.K.G. & Lagaly, G., editors). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarevic, S., Jankovic-Castvan, I., Jovanovic, D., Milonjic, S., Janackovic, D. & Petrovic, R. (2007) Adsorption of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Sr2+ ions onto natural and acid-activated sepiolites. Applied Clay Science, 37, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.W., Park, J.H., Han, S.S., Kim, J.N., Cho, S.H. & Lee, Y.T. (2005) Adsorption equilibrium and dynamics of C4 olefin/paraffin on π-complexing adsorbent. Separation Science and Technology, 39, 1365–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MTA (2002) 1:500,000 Scale Geological Map Series of Turkey, Ankara Sheet. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey. Available from https://www.mta.gov.tr/en/maps/geological-500000Google Scholar
Murray, H.H. (2007) Applied Clay Mineralogy: Occurrences, Processing, and Application of Kaolins, Bentonites, Palygorskite–Sepiolite, and Common Clays. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 188 pp.Google Scholar
Myriam, M., Suarez, M. & Martin-Pozas, J.M. (1998) Structural and textural modifications of palygorskite and sepiolite under acid treatment. Clays and Clay Minerals, 46, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J.H., Han, S.S., Kim, J.N. & Cho, S.H. (2004) Vacuum swing adsorption process for the separation of ethylene/ethane with AgNO3/clay adsorbent. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 21, 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J.H., Lee, H.K., Han, S.S., Kim, J.N. & Cho, S.H. (2002) Adsorption equilibrium of ethane/ethylene on AgNO3/clay adsorbent. Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 40, 467–473.Google Scholar
Reid, M.S. (1995) Ethylene in plant growth, development, and senescence. Pp. 486–508 in: Plant Hormones (Davis, P.J., editor). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Ramirez-Saenz, A., Lopez-Gonzalez, J.D.D., Valenzuela-Calahorro, C. & Zurita-Herrera, L. (1981) Activation of a sepiolite with dilute solutions of HNO3 and subsequent heat treatments: III. Development of porosity. Clay Minerals, 16, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, V.K., Pinto, M. & Pires, J. (2011) High pressure adsorption studies of ethane and ethylene on clay based adsorbent materials. Separation Science Technology, 46, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez Del Rio, M., García-Romero, E., Suarez, M., Da Silva, I., Fuentes-Montero, L. & Martínez-Criado, G. (2011) Variability in sepiolite: diffraction studies. American Mineralogist, 96, 1443–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srithammaraj, K., Magaraphan, R. & Manuspiya, H. (2018) Influence of thiol groups on the ethylene adsorption and conductivity properties of the modified porous clay heterostructures (PCHS) using as ethylene scavenger in smart packaging. Polymer Bulletin, 75, 3951–3969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, M. & Garcia-Romero, E. (2011) Advances in the crystal chemistry of sepiolite and palygorskite. Pp. 33–65 in: Developments in Clay Science, Vol. 3 (Galán, E. & Singer, A., editors). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Li, J. & Wang, X. (2014) The retention of uranium and europium onto sepiolite investigated by macroscopic, spectroscopic and modeling techniques. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 140, 621–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velde, B. (1992) Introduction to Clay Minerals. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 198 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente Rodriguez, M.A., Lopez Gonzalez, J.D.D. & Banares Munoz, M.A. (1994) Acid activation of a Spanish sepiolite: physicochemical characterization, free silica content and surface area of products obtained. Clay Minerals, 29, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeniyol, M. (1992) Geology, mineralogy and genesis of Yenidoğan (Sivrihisar) sepiolite deposit. Mineral Research and Exploration Bulletin of Turkey, 114, 51–64.Google Scholar
Yeniyol, M. (2012) Geology and mineralogy of a sepiolite–palygorskite occurrence from SW Eskisehir (Turkey). Clay Minerals, 47, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeniyol, M. (2014). Characterization of two forms of sepiolite and related Mg-rich clay minerals from Yenidoğan (Sivrihisar, Turkey). Clay Minerals, 49, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngjan, S. (2012) Ethylene Adsorption on Modified Bentonite. Master's thesis, Department of Chemistry, Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand, 97 pp.Google Scholar