Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:14:24.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Porosity/depth trends in reservoir sandstones: assessing the quantitative effects of varying pore-pressure, temperature history and mineralogy, Norwegian Shelf data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

M. Ramm
Affiliation:
Norsk Hydro, Research Centre, Sandsli, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
K. Bjørlykke
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Oslo, PB 1047 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo 3, Norway

Abstract

Empirical porosity/depth trends from the Norwegian Continental Shelf are discussed in the light of models on compactional processes during burial. Linear best-fit lines are useful as a first approximation, illustrating the general decline in porosity with depth. Porosity increases non-linearly with pore-pressure, and notably higher than normal porosity is found in very high overpressure reservoirs. Hydrostatic pressure sandstones from the Haltenbanken area are on average more porous than equivalents from the northern Viking Graben. This may be related to the burial history, as generally more subsidence occurred in Late Pliocene and Pleistocene in the Haltenbanken basins. The porosity/depth data show considerable scatter, and this is to a large degree related to the initial mineralogical composition. Correlated with mineralogical analyses, the reservoir sandstones show a trend towards lower porosity with increasing clay content at shallow burial, probably due to more extensive mechanical compaction. At depths >3.0–3.5 km, the porosity loss is highest in sandstones with low clay contents. This may be explained by a lower rate of quartz cementation in sandstones with abundant intergranular clays or clay coatings around quartz grains. These data show that pre-burial mineralogy is a very important factor in porosity prediction of sandstones, in many cases more important than the degree of overpressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atwater, G.I. & Miller, E.E. (1965) The effect of decrease in porosity with depth on future development of oil and gas reserves in South Louisiana. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 49, 334.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. & Butler, C.O. (1985) Compaction curves. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 69, 622–26.Google Scholar
Bjørlykke, K., Ramm, M. & Samal, G.C. (1989) Sandstone diagenesis and porosity modification during basin evolution. Geol. Rundschau 78, 243268.Google Scholar
Bjørlykke, K., Nedkvitne, T., Ramm, M. & Saigal, G.C. (1992) Diagenetic processes in the Brent Group (Middle Jurassic) reservoirs of the North Sea - an Overview. Pp. 265-289 in: Geology of the Brent Group (Morton, A.C., Hazeldine, R.S., Giles, M.R. & Brown, S., editors). Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 61.Google Scholar
Bjørlykke, K. & Egeberg, P.K. (1993) Quartz cementation in sedimentary basins. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 77, 15381548.Google Scholar
Bloch, S. (1991) Empirical prediction of porosity and permeability in sandstones. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 75, 11451160.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, S.N. (1990) Relationship between diagenesis and reservoir quality in sandstones of the Garn Formation, Haltenbanken, Mid-Norwegian Continental Shelf. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bulletin 74, 15381558.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, S.N. (1993) Preservation of anomalous high porosity in deeply buried sandstones by grain-coating chlorite: examples from the Norwegian continental shelf. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 77, 12601286.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, S.N. & Boassen, T. (1993) Factors controlling permeability variation in sandstones of the Garn Formation in Trestakk Field, Norwegian Continental Shelf. J. Sed. Pet. 63, 929944.Google Scholar
FüCHTBAUER, H. (1967) Influence of different types of diagenesis on sandstone porosity. Proc. World Petroleum Congress, 353-369.Google Scholar
Gautier, D.L. & Schmoker, J.W. (1989) Evaluation of sandstone porosity from thermal maturity information. Pp. 135-160 in: Short Course in Burial Diagenesis (Hutcheon, I.E., editor), Mineral. Assoc. Canada, 15.Google Scholar
Jones, M.E. & Addis, M.A. (1985) On changes in porosity and volume during burial of argillaceous sediments. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 2, 247253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loucks, R.G., Dodge, M.M. & Land, L.S. (1984) Regional controls on diagenesis and reservoir quality in Lower Tertiary sandstones along the Texas Gulf Coast. Pp. 15- 45 in: Clastie Diagenesis (McDonald, D.A. & SURDAM, R.C., EDITORS), AM. ASSOC. PETROL. GEOL. MEM., 37.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J.C. (1964) Influence of depth, temperature and geologic age on porosity of quartzose sandstone. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 5, 697709.Google Scholar
Nedkvite, T., Karlsen, D.A., Bjørlykke, K. & Larter, S.R. (1993) Relationship between reservoir diagenetic evolution and petroleum emplacement in the Ula Field, North Sea. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 10, 225270.Google Scholar
Ramm, M. (1991) On quantitative mineral analysis of sandstones using XRD. Dept. Geol. Oslo, Intern. Skr. ser. No. 62, 28pp.Google Scholar
Ramm, M. (1992) Porosity depth trends in reservoir sandstones; Theoretical models related to Jurassic sandstones offshore Norway. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 9, 553567.Google Scholar
Ramm, M. & Bang, N.A. (1991) Porosity distribution in Jurassic sandstones of the southern Viking Graben, North Sea. In: Porosity depth trends in sandstones” (M. Ramm) Dr. Scient thesis, Univ. Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Ramm, M. & Forsberg, A.W. (1991) Porosity versus depth trends in Upper Jurassic Sandstones from the Cod- Terrace area, Central North Sea. In: Porosity depth trends in sandstones (M. Ramm) Dr. Scient. thesis, Univ. Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Rittenhouse, G. (1971) Mechanical compaction of sandstones containing different percentages of ductile grains: a theoretical approach. Am. Ass. Petrol, Geol. Bull. 55, 9296.Google Scholar
Ryseth, A. & Ramm, M. (1995) Prediction of reservoir quality in the Statfjord Formation, Northern Viking Graben: a function of depositional architecture and burial diagenesis. Petrol. Geosci. (submitted).Google Scholar
Saigal, G.C. & Bjørlykke, K. (1992) The effect of oil emplacement on diagenetic processes—examples from the Fulmar reservoir sandstones, Central North Sea. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 76, 10241030.Google Scholar
Scherer, M. (1987) Parameters influencing porosity in sandstones: A model for sandstone porosity prediction. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 71, 485491.Google Scholar
Selley, R.C. (1978) Porosity gradients in the North Sea oilbearing sandstones. J. Geol. Soc. London 135, 11–132.Google Scholar
Spencer, A.M. (editor) (1987) Geology of the Norwegian Oil and Gas Fields. Graham & Trotman, London.Google Scholar
Walderhaug, O. (1990) A fluid inclusion study of quartz cemented sandstones from offshore mid-Norway—Possible evidence for continued quartz cementation during oil emplacement. J. Sed. Pet. 60, 203210.Google Scholar
Waples, D. (1980) Organic Geochemistry for Exploration Geologists, Geological Science Series. International Human Resources Development Corporation, Boston.Google Scholar
Wood, J.R. (1989) Modelling the effect of compaction and precipitation/dissolution on porosity. Pp. 311-362 in: Short Course in Burial Diagenesis (Hutcheon, I.E., editor) Mineralogical Association of Canada 15.Google Scholar