Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:01:35.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of process parameters to obtain NH4-clinoptilolite as a supplement to ecological fertilizer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

M. Mihajlović*
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, 86 Franchet d’Esperey St. Belgrade, Serbia
N. Perišić
Affiliation:
Weifa AS, Stuttlidalen 4, Fikkjebakke, 3766 Sannidal, P.O. Box 98, NO-3791 Kragerø, Norway
L. Pezo
Affiliation:
Institute of General and Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 12 - 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
M. Stojanović
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, 86 Franchet d’Esperey St. Belgrade, Serbia
J . Milojković
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, 86 Franchet d’Esperey St. Belgrade, Serbia
M. Petrović
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, 86 Franchet d’Esperey St. Belgrade, Serbia
J. Petrović
Affiliation:
Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials, 86 Franchet d’Esperey St. Belgrade, Serbia
*

Abstract

The application of natural fertilizer mixtures that improve nutrient retention ability of soils has attracted considerable attention in recent years. In addition to rock phosphate (RP), the basic components of these mixtures are zeolites modified with selected cations, such as the ammonium ion. The NH4-zeolite serves as a carrier of nutrients as well as a soil conditioner, and it promotes the RP dissolution in all soil types. The purpose of the present work was to prepare costeffective NH4-zeolite supplement, using 32 full factorial experimental designs, with concentration of modifier and processing time as variables. Saturation processes were carried out on two types of natural zeolites, K- clinoptilolite (K-Cp) and Ca-clinoptilolite (Ca-Cp). The Response Surface Method (RSM) was applied for evaluation of cation exchange, suggesting an effective NH4+ modification of natural zeolite at lower quantities of modifier than commonly found in other studies on the topic. Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), differences between samples relative to the process variables were clearly outlined and correlated with concentrations of the exchanged cations. The best results were obtained for the K-Cp type modified with 1.5 M solution of ammonium sulfate (at a Cp/NH4+ stochiometric ratio 1:7.5) for all three processing intervals. By optimizing the modification process parameters, an experimental design of partially saturated NH4-Cp supplement that has the potential to supply all major plant nutrients was proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akimkhan, A. (2012) Structural and ion-exchange properties of natural zeolite. Pp. 261–281 in: Ion Exchange Technologies (A. Kilislioglu, editor). InTech Pub.Google Scholar
Allen, E., Hossner, L., Ming, D. & Henninger, D. (1993) Solubility and cation exchange in phosphate rock and ammonium- and potassium-saturated clinoptiloite mixtures. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 1368–1374.Google Scholar
Allen, E., Ming, D., Hossner, L., Henninger, D. & Galindo, C. (1995) Growth and nutrient uptake of wheat in a clinoptilolite-phosphate rock substrate. Agronomy Journal, 87, 1052–1059.Google Scholar
Arcoya, A., Gonzalez, J., Travieso, N. & Seoane, X. (1994) Physicochemical and catalytic properties of a modified natural clinoptilolite. Clay Minerals, 29, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbarick, K., Lai, T. & Eberl, D. (1990) Exchange fertilizer (phosphate rock plus ammonium-zeolite) effects on sorghum-sudangrass. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54, 911–916.Google Scholar
Booker, N., Cooney, E. & Priestley, A. (1996) Ammonia removal from sewage using natural Australian zeolite. Water Science Technology, 34, 17–24.Google Scholar
Chutia, P., Kato, S., Kojima, T. & Satokawa, S. (2009) Adsorption of A. (V) on surfactant-modified natural zeolites. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 162, 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culfaz, M. & Yagiz, M. (2004) Ion-exchange properties of natural clinoptiloite: lead-sodium and cadmium equilibrium. Separation and Purification Technology, 37, 93–105.Google Scholar
Eslami, A., Qannari, E., Kohler, A. & Bougearda, S. (2014) Multivariate analysis of multiblock and multigroup data. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 133, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faghihian, H. & Pirouzi, M. (2009) Nitrogen separation from natural gas by modified clinoptilolite. Clay Minerals, 44, 289–292 Google Scholar
He, Z., Calvert, D. & Alva, A. (2002) Clinoptilolite zeolite and cellulose amendments to reduce ammonia volatilization in a calcareous sandy soil. Plant Soil, 247, 253–260.Google Scholar
Kallό, D. (2001) Applications of natural zeolites in water and wastewater treatment. Pp. 519–550 in: Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications (D.L. Bish & D.W. Ming, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Khuri, I. & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010) Response surface methodology. André Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2, 128–149.Google Scholar
Kuehl, R. (2000) Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis, 2nd edition. Pacific Grove (California), Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Lai, T. & Eberl, D. (1986) Controlled and renewable release of phosphorus in soils from mixtures of phosphate rock and NH4-exchanged clinoptilolite. Zeolites, 6, 129–132.Google Scholar
Leggo, P. (2000) An investigation of plant growth in an organo-zeolitic substrate and its ecological significance. Plant and Soil, 219, 135–146.Google Scholar
Madamba, P. (2002) The Response Surface Methodology: an application to optimize dehydration operations of selected agricultural crops. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 35, 584–592.Google Scholar
Martens, H. & Martens, M. (2001) Multivariate analysis of quality. An introduction. Measurement Science and Technology, 12, 1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihajlović, M., Perišić, N., Pezo, L., Stojanovic, M., Milojkovic, J., Lopičić, Z. & Petrović M. (2014) Utilization of phosphate rock from Lisina for direct application: release of plant nutrients in the exchange- fertilizer mixtures. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62, 9965–9973.Google Scholar
Millan, G., Agosto, F., Vazquez, M., Botto, L., Lombardi, L. & Juan, L. (2008) Use of clinoptiloite as a carrier for nitrogen fertilizers in soils of the Pampean regions of Argentina. Ciencia e investigaciόn agraria, 35, 245–254.Google Scholar
Milonjic, S. & Ruvarac, A. (1975) The heat of immersion of natural magnetite in aqueous solutions. Thermochimica Acta, 2, 261–266.Google Scholar
Ming, D. & Mumpton, F. (1989) Zeolites in soils. Pp. 873–911 in: Minerals in Soil Environments 2nd edition (J. Dixon & S. Weed, editors). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Misaelides, P. (2011) Application of natural zeolites in environmental remediation: A short review. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 144, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D. (1997) Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google Scholar
Motsi, T., Rowson, N. & Simmons, M. (2009) Adsorption of heavy metals from acid mine drainage by natural zeolite. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 92, 42–48.Google Scholar
Moussavi, G., Talebi, S., Farrokhi, M. & Sabouti, R. (2011) The investigation of mechanism, kinetic and isotherm of ammonia and humic acid co-adsorption onto natural zeolite. Chemical Engineering Journal, 171, 1159–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumpton, F. (1999) La roca magica: uses of natural previous zeolites in agriculture and industry. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 3463–3470.Google Scholar
Ouki, S. & Kavannagh, M. (1999) Treatment of metalscontaminated wastewaters by use of natural zeolites. Water Science Technology, 39, 115–122.Google Scholar
Peter, A., Mihaly-Cozmuta, L., Nicula, C., Indrea, E. & Tutu, H. (2012) Calcium and ammonium ionmodification of zeolite amendments affects the metal uptake of Hieracium piloselloides in a dose-dependent way. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14, 2807–2814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, H., Menzies, N. & Hunter, M. (2002) Zeolite/ rock phosphate – a novel slow release phosphorus fertilizer for potted plant production. Scientia Horticulturae, 94, 333–343.Google Scholar
Polat, E., Karaca, M., Demir, H. & Onus, A.N. (2004) Use of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) in agriculture. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 12, 183–189.Google Scholar
Ramesh, K., Biswas, A., Somasundaram, J. & Rao, A. (2010) Nanoporous zeolites in farming: current status and issues ahead. Current Science, 99, 760–764.Google Scholar
Roder, W., Schurmann, S., Chittanavanh, P., Sipaseuth, K. & Fernandez, M. (2006) Soil fertility management for organic rice production in the Lao P.R.. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 21, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozic, M., Cerjan-Stefanovic, S., Kurajica, S., Vancina, V. & Hodzic, E. (2000) Ammoniacal nitrogen removal from water treatment with clays and zeolites. Water Research, 34, 3675–3681.Google Scholar
Stojakovic Dj., Milenkovic, J., Daneu, N. & Rajic, N. (2011) A study of the removal of copper ions from aqueous solution using clinoptilolite from Serbia. Clays and Clay Minerals, 59, 277–285.Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Peng, Y. (2010) Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 156, 11–24.Google Scholar
Zhao, B., Li, X., Liu, H., Wang, B., Zhu, P., Huang, S., Bao, D., Li, Y. & So, H. (2011) Results from long-term fertilizer experiments in China: The risk of groundwater pollution by nitrate. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 58, 177–183.Google Scholar