Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:04:41.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of heating and acid pre-treatment on pore size distribution of sepiolite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

S. Balci
S. Balci*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Gazi University, 06570 Maltepe – Ankara, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Due to its channels of molecular dimensions and a high specific surface area, sepiolite has many industrial applications which require high resistance to thermal effects in addition to a large surface area. On heating, sorbed water molecules are removed causing changes in the pore size distribution. In this study, the effects of thermal treatment on the pore structure of sepiolite and the acid-treated sepiolite samples were investigated. The solid density of sepiolite, measured by a He displacement technique, was 2.08 g cm-3 and total porosity was ~0.58. Both of these values showed an increase at 100°C, then decreased with further temperature increase due to crystal deformation and channel plugging which occurred at elevated temperatures. The BET surface area of the original sepiolite was 148 m2 g-1, and increased to 263 m2 g-1 at 100°C and then started to decrease. Approximately 16% of the total volume was in the micropores at 100°C. The acid pre-activation caused restrictions in possible crystal deformation during thermal treatment. The micropore volume increased to 20% and BET surface area reached values >500 m2 g-1 for the acid-treated samples.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 647 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahamonde, A., Beretta, A., Avila, P. & Tronconi, E. (1996) An experimental and theoretical investigation of the behaviour of a monolithic Ti-V-W sepiolite catalyst in the reduction of NOX with NH3. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 2516–2521.Google Scholar
Balcı, S. (1996) Thermal decomposition of sepiolite and variations in pore structure with and without acid pre-treatment. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 66, 72–78.Google Scholar
Bautista, F.M., Campelo, J.M., Garcia, A., Guardeno, R., Luna, D. & Marinas, J.M. (1996) Influence of Ni-Cu alloying on sepiolite supported nickel catalyst in the liquid phase selective hydrogenation of fatty acid ethyl esters. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 104, 229–235.Google Scholar
Bernal, M.P. & Lopez-Real, J.M. (1993) Natural zeolites and sepiolite as ammonium and ammonia adsorbent materials. Bioresource Technol. 43, 27–33.Google Scholar
Campelo, J.M., Garcia, A., Luna, D. & Marinas, J.M. (1989) Textural properties, surface chemistry and catalytic activity in cyclohexene skeletal isomerization of acid treated natural sepiolites. Mater Chem. Phys. 24, 51–70.Google Scholar
Çetişli, H. & Gedikbey, T. (1990) Dissolution kinetics of sepiolite from Eskisehir (Turkey) in hydrochloric and nitric acids. Clay Miner. 25, 207–215.Google Scholar
Corma, A. & Mocholi, F.A. (1992) New silica-aluminamagnesia FCC active matrix and its possibilities as a basic nitrogen passivating compound. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 84, 31–46.Google Scholar
Corma, A., Perez-Pariente L, Fornes, V. & Mifsud, A. (1984) Surface acidity and catalytic activity of a modified sepiolite. Clay Miner. 19, 673–676.Google Scholar
Corma, A., Nieto, J.M.L., Paredes, N. & Perez, M. (1993) Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane on vanadium supported on magnesium silicates. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 97, 159–175.Google Scholar
Daza, L., Mendioroz, S. & Pajares, J.A. (1993) Mercury elimination from gaseous stream. Appl. Catal. B-Enviro. 2, 277–287.Google Scholar
De la Caillerie, J.B.D. & Fripiat JJ. (1992) Al modified sepiolite as catalyst or catalyst support. Catal. Today, 14, 125–140.Google Scholar
Gregg, J. & Sing, K.S.W. (1982) Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity. Academic Press, London, New York.Google Scholar
Guijarro, M.I., Mendioroz, S. & Munoz, V. (1994) Impact of the preparation conditions in the sulphur distribution of a new sulphurized porous adsorbent. Ind. Eng. Chern. Res. 33, 375–381.Google Scholar
Inagaki, Y., Fukushima, H.D. & Kamigaito, O. (1990) Pore size distribution and adsorption selectivity of sepiolite. Clay Miner. 25, 99–105.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Lopez, A., Lopez-Gonzalez, J. de D., Ramirez-Saenz, A., Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Valenzuela-Calahorro, C. & Zurita-Herrera, L. (1978) Evolution of surface area in a sepiolite as a function of acid and heat treatments. Clay Miner. 13, 375–385.Google Scholar
Kiyohiro, T. & Otsuka, R. (1989) Dehydration mechanism of bound water in sepiolite. Thermochim. Ada, 147, 127–138.Google Scholar
Lopez Gonzalez, J. de D., Ramirez Saenz, A., Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Valenzuela Calahorro, C. & Zurita Herrera, L. (1981) Activacion de una sepiolita con disoluciones diluidas de NO3H y posteriores tratamientos termicos: I. Estudio de la superficie específica. Clay Miner. 16, 103 — 113 (in Spanish).Google Scholar
Lopez-Gonzalez, J. de D., Valenzuela Calahorro, C., Jimenez Lopez, A. & Rodriguez, R. (1978) Retention isotherms of n-butylamine on activated sepiolite. II. Retention isotherms. An. Quim. 74, 220–224.Google Scholar
Martin Vivaldi, J.L. & Fenoll Hach-Ali, P. (1969) Palygorskites and sepiolites. Pp. 553 — 573 in: Differential Thermal Analysis (Mackenzie, R.C., editor). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Myriam, M., Suarez, M. & Martin-Pozas, J.M. (1998) Structural and textural modifications of palygorskite and sepiolite under acid treatment. Clays Clay Miner. 46, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankel, L.A. (1994) Hydrocracking vacuum resid with Ni-W bifunctional slurry catalyst. Fuel Process. Technol. 37, 185–202.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, F. & Martinez, L. (1993) Purification of hydrochloric acid by isooctane extraction. Solvent Extr. Ion Exc. 11, 239–257.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., Ramirez-Saenz, A., Lopez-Gonzalez, J.D., Valenzuela-Calahorro, C. & Zurita-Herrera, L. (1981) Activation of a sepiolite with dilute solutions of HNO3 and subsequent heat treatments: III. Development of porosity. Clay Miner. 16, 315–323.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, M.A.V., Gonzalez, J.D.L. & Munoz, M.A.B. (1995) Influence of free silica generated during acid activation of sepiolite on the adsorbent and textural properties of the resulting solids. J. Mater. Chem. 5, 127–132.Google Scholar
Ruiz, R., del Moral, J.C., Pesquera C, Benito, I. & Gonzalez, F. (1996) Reversible folding in sepiolite; study by thermal and textural analysis. Thermochim. Ada, 279, 103–110.Google Scholar
Sarkaya, Y., Ceylan, H., Bozdoğan, I. & Akmc, M. (1993) Determination of pore size distribution from thermal analysis data — thermoporometry. Turkish J. Chem. 17, 119–124.Google Scholar
Serna, C. & van Scoyoc, G.E. (1978) Infrared study of sepiolite and palygorskite surfaces. Proc. Int. Clay Conf., Oxford, 197-206.Google Scholar
Serratosa, J.M. (1978) Surface properties of fibrous clay minerals — palygorskite and sepiolite. Proc. Int. Clay Conf, Oxford, 99-109.Google Scholar
Sugiura, M., Hayashi, H. & Suzuki, T. (1991) Adsorption of ammonia by sepiolite in ambient air. Clay Sci. 8, 87–100.Google Scholar
Ünal, H.I. & Erdoan, B. (1998) The use of sepiolite for decolorization of sugar juice. Appl. Clay. Sci. 12, 419–429.Google Scholar
Vicente Rodriguez, M.A., Lopez-Gonzalez, J. de D. & Banares Munoz, M.A. (1994) Acid-activation of a Spanish sepiolite: physicochemical characterization, free silica content and surface area of products obtained. Clay Miner. 29, 361–367.Google Scholar