Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:27:46.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of functions for evaluating the effect of Fe and Al oxides on the particle size distribution of kaolin and quartz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

M. Arias
Affiliation:
Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Facultade de Farmacia, Universidade de Santiago, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
E. Lopez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Facultade de Farmacia, Universidade de Santiago, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
M. T. Barral
Affiliation:
Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Facultade de Farmacia, Universidade de Santiago, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Abstract

Although it is generally agreed that Fe and Al can act to bind soil particles, their relative efficiencies as aggregants are still disputed. In this work, the aggregating efficiencies of both aged and non-aged Fe and Al oxides precipitated on kaolin or quartz substrates were characterized by comparing their effects on particle size distributions (PSD). To facilitate comparison of PSD data, these were parameterized by fitting them with five different probability density functions (the normal, lognormal, Jaky, fractal and Rosin-Rammler functions). The best fits were given by the Rosin-Rammler function (R2 = 0.997), whose α parameter was used to compare the aggregating efficiency of Fe and Al oxides: in order of decreasing efficiency, non-aged Al > non-aged Fe ≈ aged Fe > aged Al-precipitates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arca, M.N. & Weed, S.B. (1966) Soil aggregation and porosity in relation to contents of free iron oxide and clay. Soil Sci. 101, 164170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arduino, E., Barberis, E. & Boero, V. (1989) Iron oxides and particle aggregation in B horizons of some Italian soils. Geoderma, 45, 319329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, M., Barral, M.T. & Díaz-Fierros, F. (1995) Effects of iron and aluminum oxides on the colloidal and surface properties of kaolin. Clay Clay Miner. 43, 406416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barral, M.T., Arias, M. & Díaz-Fierros, F. (1992) Estabilidad estructural de suelos desarrolla dos sobre materiales geológicos ricos en hierro. Proc. III Congreso Nacional de la Ciencia del Suelo, 57–62, Pamplona, Spain.Google Scholar
Bartoli, F., Philippy, R. & Burtin, G. (1988) Aggregation in soils with small amounts of swelling clays. I. Aggregate stability. J. Soil Sci. 39, 593616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benito Rueda, E. & Diaz-Fierros Viqueira, F. (1989) Estudio de los principales factores que intervienen en la estabilidad estiuctural de los suelos de Galicia. An. Edafol. Agrobiol. 48, 229253.Google Scholar
Colombo, C. & Torrent, J. (1991) Relationships between aggregation and iron oxides in Terra Rossa soils from southern Italy. Catena, 18, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, T.L., Greenland, D.J. & Quirk, J.P. (1964) Influence of iron and aluminium oxides on the charges of soil and clay materials. Trans. 8th Int. Congr. Soil Sci., Bucharest, 1213-1225.Google Scholar
Deshpande, T.L., Greenland, D.J. & Quirk, J.P. (1968) Changes in soil properties associated with the removal of iron and aluminium oxides. J. Soil Sci. 19, 108122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Rayah, H.M.E. & Rowell, D.L. (1973) The influence of iron and aluminium hydroxides on the swelling of Na-montmorillonite and the permeability of a Na-soil. J. Soil Sci. 24, 137144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Swaify, S.A. & Emerson, W.W. (1975) Changes in the physical properties of soil clays due to precipitated aluminium and iron hydroxides: I. Swelling and aggregate stability after drying. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 39, 10561063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, H. & Shainberg, I. (1980) The effect of hydroxy- Al and hydroxy-Fe polymers on montmorillonite particle size. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 626629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. & Glaubig, R.A. (1987) Effect of saturating cation, pH and aluminum and iron oxides on the flocculation of kaolinite and montmorillonite. Clays Clay Miner. 35, 220227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaky, J. (1944) Soil Mechanics. Egyetemi Nyomda, Budapest (in Hungarian). Cited in: Probabilistic solutions in geotechnics. Dev. Geotech. Eng. 46, 157.Google Scholar
Kemper, W.D. & Koch, E.J. (1966) Aggregate stability of soils from Western United States and Canada. Measurement procedure. Correlations with soil constituents. ARS, USDA Tech. Bull. No. 1355.Google Scholar
Krishna Murti, G.S.R. & Richards, S.J. (1974) Some effects of sesquioxides on soil structure. Ind. J. Agron. 19, 141147.Google Scholar
Krishna Murti, G.S.R., Gurcharan, S. & Rengasamy, P. (1977) The nature of soil clays and the stability of microaggregates. Aust. J. Soil Res. 15, 115–119.Google Scholar
Kroth, E.M. & Page, J.B. (1947) Aggregate formation in soils with special reference to cementing substances. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 11, 2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McItyre, D.S. (1956) The effect of free oxide on the structure of some Terra Rossa and Rendzina soils. J. Soil Sci. 7, 302306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfect, E. & Kay, B.D. (1991) Fractal theory applied to soil aggregation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 15521558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfect, E., Kay, B.D., Ferguson, J.A., Da Silva, A.P. & Denholm, K.A. (1993) Comparison of functions for characterizing the dry aggregate size distribution of tilled soil. Soil Tillage Res. 28, 123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosin, D. & Rammler, E. (1933) Laws governing the fineness of powdered coal. J. Inst. Fuel 7, 29–36.Google Scholar
Schaller, F.W. & Stockinger, K.R. (1953) A comparison of five methods for expressing aggregation data. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 17, 310313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turcotte, D.L. (1986) Fractals and fragmentation. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 19211926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar