Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:13:18.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adsorption of alkylammonium cations by montmorillonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

B. K. G. Theng
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia
D. J. Greenland
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Soil Science, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, University of Adelaide, South Australia
J. P. Quirk
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia

Abstract

The adsorption of various alkylammonium cations from aqueous solution by sodium and calcium montmorillonite has been studied. Adsorption occurred through an exchange reaction between the inorganic cations on the clay and the alkylammonium ions in solution. The affinity of the clay for these cations was linearly related to molecular weight, with the exception of the smaller methyl-ammonium and the larger quaternary ammonium ions. Comparison of primary, secondary and tertiary amines containing the same alkyl groups showed that the affinity of the clay was greatest for the primary amine and least for the tertiary. This behaviour has been interpreted in terms of the size and shape of the cations. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that no more than a single layer of adsorbed cations was present in the inter-lamellar space at maximum adsorption. Comparison between Δ-values and the thickness of the adsorbed ions showed that there was a contraction in the apparent contact distance of these cations. The amount of contraction could be accounted for by ‘keying’ of the adsorbed ions into the montmorillonite surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amphlett, C.B. (1964) Inorganic ion Exchangers,Chap. 2, p. 15, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Barrer, R.M. & Brummer, K. (1963) Trans. Faraday Soc.59, 959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrer, R.M. & Macleod, D.M. (1955) Trans Faraday Soc.51, 1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, R.J., Durrum, E.L & Zweig, G. (1958) Paper Chromatography & Paper Electrophoresis, 2nd edn., p. 164. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bradley, W.F. (1945) J. Am. chem. Soc.67, 975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berindley, G.W. & Hoffmann, R.W. (1962) Clays Clay Miner.9, 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaussidon, J. & Calvet, R. (1965) J. phys. Chem., Ithac.69, 2265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, K.E. (1947) Nature, Lond.160, 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, C.T. & White, D. (1958) Trans. Faraday Soc.54, 691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, S. & Kinter, E.B. (1963) Clays Clay Miner.10, 163.Google Scholar
Emmerson, W.W. (1960) Nature, Lond.186, 573.Google Scholar
Fripiat, J.J., Cloos, P. & Poncelet, A. (1965) Bull. Soc. chim. Ft.208.Google Scholar
Fripiat, J.J., Leonard, A. & Servais A., (1962) Bull. Soc. chim. Fr.625.Google Scholar
Gaines, G.L & Thomas, H.C. (1953) J. chem. Phys.21, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene-Kelly, R. (1955) Trans. Faraday Soc.51, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene-Kelly, R. (1956) Trans. Faraday Soc.52, 1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenland, D.J., Laby, R.H. & Quirk, J.P. (1962) Trans. Faraday Soc.58, 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenland, D.J., Laby, R.H. & Quirk, J.P. (1965) Trans. Faraday Soc.61, 2013.Google Scholar
Greenland, D.J. & Quirk, J.P. (1962) Clays Clay Miner.9, 484.Google Scholar
Greenland, D.J., Quirk, J.P. & Trieng, B.K.G. (1964) J. Colloid Sci.19, 837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfferich, F. (1962) Ion Exchange. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, R.W. & Brindley, G.W. (1960) Geochim. cosmochim. Act.20, 15.Google Scholar
Jordan, J.W. (1949a) Mineralog. Mag.28, 589.Google Scholar
Jordan, J.W. (1949b) J. phys. Chem., Ithac.53, 294.Google Scholar
Klotz, I. (1964) Chemical Thermodynamics,p. 148. Benjamin, New York.Google Scholar
Laby, R.H. & Taeng, B.K.G. (1964)Second AustralianClay Mineral Conference, Adelaide, 18.Google Scholar
Lederer, E. & Lederer, M. (1957) Chromatography,2nd edn., p. 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. (1948) Trans. Faraday Soc.44, 349.Google Scholar
Mikhalyuk, R.V. & Kurilenko, O.D. (1959) Khim. i khim. Tekhno.2, 336.Google Scholar
Pauling, L. (1960) The Nature o/the Chemical Bond,3rd edn., p. 260. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Robinson, R.A. & Stokes, R.H. (1955) Electrolyte Solutions,p. 481. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Sieskind, E. & Wee, R. (1958) C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 247.74.Google Scholar
Slabaugh, W.H. (1954) J. phys. Chem., Ithac.58, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabaugh, W.H. & Kupka, F. (1958) J. phys. Chem., Ithac.62, 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, R.H. (1963) Trans. Faraday Soc.59, 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talibudeen, O. (1955) Trans. Faraday Soc.51, 582.Google Scholar
Tensmeyer, L.G., Hoffmann, R.W. & Brindley, G.W. (1960) J. phys. Chem., Ithac.64, 1655.Google Scholar
Theng, B.K.G. (1964) Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. (1963) Angew. Chem.International Edition, 2, 134.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. & Micehel, E. (1958) Z. anorg, allg. Chem.296, 313.Google Scholar
Whitlow, E.P. & Felsing, W.A. (1944) J. Am. chem. Soc.66, 2028.Google Scholar
Wild, A. & Keay, J. (1964) J. Soil Sci.15, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar