Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:59:32.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sorption of benzene and water by a “Phenyl” montmorillonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. M. Barrer  and
J. S. S. Reay
R. M. Barrer
Affiliation:
Physical Chemical Laboratories, Imperial College, London
J. S. S. Reay
Affiliation:
Physical Chemical Laboratories, Imperial College, London
Get access

Extract

A sample of “phenyl” montmorillonite containing 10% by weight of carbon has been examined as a sorbent for nitrogen, benzene and water. The material shows only a small loss in weight on outgassing, and there is no interlamellar sorption of nitrogen and little of either benzene or water. In its behaviour as a sorbent it thus differs notably from the natural clay, from some alkyl ammonium forms of clay, and from certain “clay esters.” The small amount of interlamellar sorbed benzene is desorbed with difficulty and is sorbed only slowly. It is concluded that nearly all the interlamellar space is filled with organic material, but it is not possible to say whether this is chemically bonded or very strongly sorbed by a physical mechanism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals Bulletin , Volume 3 , Issue 19 , August 1958 , pp. 214 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrer, R. M. and MacLeod, D. M. 1955. Trans. Faraday Soc., 51, 1290 Google Scholar
Barrer, R. M. and MacLeod, D. M. 1954. Trans. Faraday Soc., 50, 980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrer, R. M. and Reay, J. S. S. Trans. Faraday Soc., 53, 1253.Google Scholar
Berger, G., 1941. Chem. Weekbl., 38, 42.Google Scholar
Brown, G., Greene-Kelly, R. and Norrish, K. 1952. Nature, Lond., 169, 756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuel, H. 1952. Ber. dtsch. keram. Ges., 31, 1.Google Scholar
Deuel, H. and Huber, G. 1951. Helv. chim. Acta, 34, 1697.Google Scholar
Deuel, H. and Huber, G. 1952. Helv. chim. Acta, 35, 1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, C. H. 1947. Verre et Silic. industr., 12, Suppl. 3.Google Scholar
Edelman, C. H. and Favajee, J. L. 1940. Z. Kristallogr., 102, 417.Google Scholar
Greenland, D. J. and Russell, F. W. 1955. Trans. Faraday Soc., 51, 1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E. 1953. Clay Mineralogy, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 62.Google Scholar
Hofmann, U., Endell, K. and Wilm, D. 1933. Z. Kristallogr., 86, 340.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. E. 1935. Z. Kristallogr., 91, 433 Google Scholar
Schwarz, R. and Hennicke, H. W. 1956. Z. anorg. Chem., 283, 346.Google Scholar
Slabaugh, W. H. 1952. J. phys. Chem., 56, 748.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. F. and Gieseking, J. E. 1952. J. phys. Chem., 56, 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivaldi, J. L. M. and Hendricks, S.B. 1952. An. Edafol. Fisiol. veg., 11, 601.Google Scholar