Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T20:27:16.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valeriana Tertia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

E. Courtney
E. Courtney
Affiliation:
King's College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1965 , pp. 151 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 151 note 1 P. B. Whitehead mentions Ovid's strictness in observing this rule; he states that when the caesura in the third foot is feminine, there must be masculine caesurae in the second and fourth feet (‘A New Method of Investigating the Caesura in Latin Hexa-meter and Pentameter’, A.J.P. li [1930], p. 362).

page 151 note 2 See also in The Academy 27 (no. 661, 1885), 11.

page 151 note 3 See Löfstedt, Eranos xlvii (1949), 148 ff.

page 152 note 1 Langen doubtless recalled with amusement that Madvig (Adv. Crit. ii. 32) had castigated Ladewig for this very mistake.

page 152 note 2 See, e.g., Schmalz, B.P.W.29 (1909), 27; van Wageningen, ibid. 36 (1917), 1127; A. J. Bell, The Latin Dual and Poetic Diction, 123; D. Daube, Forms of Roman Legislation, 65.