Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:23:21.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two urban praetors in Valerius Maximus1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Robin Seager
Robin Seager
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 11
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Broughton writes that the prominence given Celer in Cic. Sull. 65 seems in favour of making him praetor urbanus. But in that passage there appears to be no way of knowing whether Celer was chosen as the recipient of P. Sulla's message because of his office or because of some private tie.

3 A further possibility, suggested by Broughton in his letter, is that Mummius was the peregrine rather than the urban praetor. This would leave the urban praetorship of 70 open for Piso.