Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:29:27.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Passages of the Oedipus Tyrannus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Eric Laughton
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 210 note 1 The accent-change could have taken place at any time in the tradition before L. L hasthe paroxytone faintly marked; it may possibly have been inserted by the diorthotes without reference to the archetype. It is not impossible that in the earliest copies of the play the word was left unaccented to represent an ambiguity which may have been deliberate on the part of the poet. Such a double entendre would have; real tragic significance.

page 211 note 1 For instances in Sophocles of the aorist ϰανоν see O.C. 545, Ant. 1319, 1340. It is comparatively common in Euripides; for the participle see H.F. 865.